chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Samuel Reshevsky vs Reuben Fine
Nottingham (1936), Nottingham ENG, rd 4, Aug-13
Queen's Gambit Declined: Vienna Variation (D39)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 22 more Reshevsky/Fine games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can see a list of all games that they have seen recently at their Game History Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-14-04  kostich in time: Acording to the Tournament book, the tournament director was deeply concerned that Fines sarcasms about Reshevskys efforts to win in a drawn position would lead to "a breach of the peace" However, the next day Euwe"playing the part of the good uncle", was able to put"the two Americans on good terms". from what ive heared about the Fine-Reshevsky realationship, tthat must have been one of the shortest armistices in history.
Nov-23-04  Airlock: Why shouldn't Reshevsky have tried to win the endgame, he was a pawn up. Even if it was a theoretical draw.
Nov-24-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: In the tournament book, Alekhine claimed a win for White with 38. ♕e5+!
Nov-24-04  drukenknight: yeah, well. it seems Reshevsky simply made a very tactical decision having to do with time, etc. That maybe he coud get a little something out of the position at move 38, or simply take a break, return to the board fresh and maybe outplay Reuben.

In the event, it seems justified since later on, move 53 he seems to have gained a couple of pawns, what more could be expected to get out of the position? PErhaps then Reuben simply hung on.

Nov-24-04  fizixgeek: Did White miss a win with 31.Qa4 followed by 32.Nc6 ? Or am I the one missing something?
Nov-24-04  fizixgeek: Oops! Never mind. 31.Qa4 is answered by 31...Qxe2 and the bishop is small consolation for the havoc black's queen will reek on white pawns.
Nov-24-04  fizixgeek: Maybe 32.Qa4!? when 32...Qb5 loses to 33. Qxb5 Rxb5 34. Nc6 Rh5 35.Rxb4 g6 36.h4 and anything else loses the bishop immediately.
Nov-24-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <fizixgeek: Maybe 32.Qa4!?>

What if then 32...♕xa5 and if 33. ♕e8+ ♗f8 34. ♖c1 ♕f5 seems to win for Black?

Jun-28-12  Howard: A couple of comments about this game....

First, if you look at the eye-opening website www.truechess.com, you'll see that contrary to Alekhine's notes, Fine's 50...Kd6 was a significant mistake. (Alekhine awards it an exclamation mark.) Fine's position was now lost, but--as the website indicates--Reshevsky missed the win later.

Second, Andy Soltis's fine book on the history of the U.S. Championship (which just came out in its third edition!) mentions that Fine and Reshevsky almost got "into a fistfight" during this game because Fine was making sarcastic remarks while it was in progress.

Feb-08-14  jerseybob: Howard: I wasn't able to find Reshevsky-Fine on your link, but let me guess: 53.Qf4+ was better than 53.Qh7? and seems to win, while back on move 50, Qc7 is better than 50..Kd6
Oct-26-15  jerseybob: Howard: I finally located the Reshevsky-Fine analysis on your truechess link, and I got one out of two: I correctly picked 53.Qf4+ for Reshevsky, but missed the recommended 50..Qa2+ for Fine.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Round 4
from Nottingham 1936 - Alekhine by vantheanh
Round 4
from Nottingham 1936 by Hesam7
Round 4
from Nottingham 1936 by JoseTigranTalFischer


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC