Joseph Blackburne vs Wilhelm Steinitz (1899)

Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players ·

Kibitzing

Joseph Blackburne vs Wilhelm Steinitz
London (1899), London ENG, rd 23, Jun-30
Formation: Queen Pawn Game: London System (D02) · 0-1

White to move.

ANALYSIS [x]

0-1

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1

FEN COPIED

explore this opening	find similar games	37 more Blackburne/Steinitz games
	PGN: download \| view \| print	Help: general \| java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE. [CLICK HERE]

Sep-18-06		percyblakeney: Steinitz last tournament was the only one where he didn’t finish among the prize winners. He won against Blackburne who had quite a good tournament, beating Lasker. Here he could have resigned at least 10-15 moves earlier though…

Jan-07-13		RayDelColle: What may be my best reply to? Thank You! Be Well! 1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Bf4 c5 4. Ne5

Mar-21-17		KEG: As percyblakeney notes, Blackburne had a fine tournament in London 1899. He scored the only win against Lasker and beat Pillsbury twice. This game, however, was one of his worst performances in this event, and one of Steinitz' best games in the tournament. Blackburne made so many awful moves that a complete catalog of them would be pointless. Blackburne should have seized the initiative with 14. e4. Instead, his 14. 0-0 allowed Steinitz to strike first with 14...e5. Also weak was Blackburne's 16. h3 (he should have played 16. h4) to which Steinitz should have replied 16...h4. After Steinitz' actual 16...g5, Blackburne cleverly played 17. e4, after which 17...dxe4 would have lost to 18. Nc4 and if 18...Qd8 19. Rd1. Steinitz didn't fall for that one, but after his 17...Be6 (best) Blackburne had approximate equality. Blackburne's plan beginning with 21. a5 was faulty, and Steinitz' position was winning after that (Blackburne should have played 21. Qd1). Beginning with move 23, Blackburne simply fell apart. 23. Nc4 was vastly inferior to 23. Rad1, and he definitely should have played 24. Bh2 before Steinitz got in 24. f4. Blackburne's 26. g3 effectively smothered his own position (he was lost anyway, but this was suicide). The Tournament Book says that Steinitz should have buried Blackburne's bishop with 26...f3, but Steinitz' 26...0-0 was even more crushing. Blackburne's 27. gxf4 was hopeless, as was his 28. Bf1. The remainder of the game does not warrant discussion, except for the bizarre finale in which Blackburne--presumably as a joke--decided he wanted to Queen a pawn before resigning. He got his wish with 45. a8(Q), but Steinitz now had mate in four beginning with 45...RxR+. Hard to believe this was the same Blackburne who had brilliantly defeated Lasker in round 4 and who bested Pillsbury twice.

Mar-27-20		joddon: a very dangerous middle game game in 1800s....the queen s silence of nuetralisation is well depicted in this war....feud between these big enemies.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
Nothing in violation of United States law.
No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
No trolling.
The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.