KEG: An exciting game filled with sins of omission by both players and by the very poor commentary in the Tournament Book by Hoffer. The Tournament Book's take on this game is that Blackburne played a poor opening that gave him a lost game, and that he tried a desperate and brilliant attack to try to extricate himself from the results of his poor opening that was only foiled by the excellent defensive play by Janowski. This is simply wrong. A much better overview of the game is that provided here by yueesystem. With regard to the opening, the Tournament Book states that the variation adopted by Blackburne required him to weaken his King's side with 9...f6. This claim is nonsense. Blackburne played the King's Fianchetto variation of the Modern Steinitz Defense to the Ruy Lopez. This line may not be everyone's cup of tea, but it is certainly playable. The flaw in the Tournament Book's claim can be seen by examining the position after Janowski's 9. Bg5:  click for larger viewAccording to the Tournament Book, Black is compelled to play the weakening 9...f6 here. But in fact 9...Nf6 is fine here (and is Fritz' choice). Indeed, even 9...Bf6 is better than the weakening 9...f6. Simply put the claim that this line of the Modern Steinitz Defense leads to fatal weaknesses is flat out wrong. I can see no reason for 9...Bf6, which did indeed compromise Blackburne's position. Even after Blackburne's 9...f6, he still had ample chances given Janowski's strange follow-up. After 10. Be3 Qe7 Janowski messed up his Queen's side with 11. b4 (instead of the much better 11. c4). The position was then:  click for larger viewAt this point, Blackburne had at least two reasonable lines of play. He could have castled on the Queen's side (11...0-0-0) or tried for counterplay on the King's side with 11...f5. Instead he played 11...Rd8, effectively suffocating his position. Janowski should have then played 12. Bb3 immediately (he is praised to the heavens by the Tournament Book for finally getting around to this two moves later). After Janbowski's weak 12. Nbd2, Blackburne further locked in his position with 12...Qf7 (12...Bh6 was a better try). Thanks to his poor play--and not because of the opening or anything Janowski had done--Blackburne found himself in a precarious situation after Janowski's 16. Nb3:  click for larger viewJanowski was threatening 17. Nc5 and (as the Tournament Book correctly notes) efforts to defend the b pawn with Rb8 or Qc8 would have been futile. Instead, Blackburne came up with a wonderful plan that leads to all of the following excitement. He played 16...b6, keeping the White Knight from posting on c5, allowing White to win the pawn at a6, but planning to castle King's side and then storm the White King. What a fine idea! Much better than being strangled to death. After 16...b6 17. Qxa6 0-0, Blackburne was poised to undertake his attack. But Janowski, unaccountably, played 18. Rad1 instead of 18. Rfd1. Now, Blackburne had an open file and a target:  click for larger viewThe indicated move here is 18...Ra8, after which--though still a pawn down after the likely 19. Qe2 Blackburne would have had a very playable game. Instead, he ignored this possibility, began his pawn march on the King's side with 18...h6, and allows Janowski to trade off a pair of Rooks. After a few more weak moves, Blackburne's position was in critical condition, and Janowksi had the opportunity to begin Queen-side operations with a4:  click for larger viewBut instead of trying to get something going on the Queen's side, Janowski began a retreat with 25. Nc1 followed by 26. Nf1. (more to follow in next post) |