chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Igor Bondarevsky vs Mikhail Botvinnik
USSR Absolute Championship (1941), Leningrad-Moscow URS, rd 9, Apr-20
French Defense: Advance Variation. Nimzowitsch System (C02)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 35 times; par: 43 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 9 more Bondarevsky/Botvinnik games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-30-04  Jesuitic Calvinist: I am surprised not to see any kibitzing on this gem played in the 1941 Supreme Soviet Championship.

The manouvre ...Qg8/Qh7 is classic Nimzovichian restraint (or even a bit Reti-like). GM Ray Keene, where are you when we need you?

Jul-30-04  Calli: And Bondarevsky failed to follow Nimzo's strategy of overprotecting e5 in the French. Botvinnik's Qg8! is excellent. He gets the Q in better position before demolishing the center.
May-24-06  schaduw2: White surrendered because after Rxc1 black plays Rxh4!! (with mate after gxh4? and Bf4+)
Jun-09-06  Halfpricemidge: So what if black captures NxQ instead??
Jun-09-06  pawn to QB4: I suppose just 30...Bxd2 e.g. 31.Rxf5 Bxc1 or 31. Nb3 Bg5 32.Rxf5 Bxh4 and in either case Black's a rook up.
Jun-09-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: Qd8-g8-h7 manoeuvre can be seen also in A Sokolov vs Yusupov, 1986
Sep-05-06  Zorts: Was 22.Kh2 forced? What if 22.Kf1?
Feb-15-08  Benzol: Because Botvinnik was ill this game was postponed until April 20th.
Nov-03-23  rmdalodado: This is given as Game # 67 in Chernev's book The Golden Dozen with the following notes:

"This elegant little game deserves to be better known.

Played in a tournament where Botvinnik was at the top of his form, its merits have been overshadowed by a half dozen other masterpieces that he produced in the course of the competition.

The clever way in which Botvinnik gains control of the center is by itself a delight, two amusing queen moves being reminiscent of a similar subtle strategy employed by Nimzowitsch in his famous encounter with Johner at Dresden in 1926.

Those two moves alone are worth the price of admission."

May-01-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  louispaulsen88888888: The much praised 14…Qg8 is actually a lemon. White should have responded 15 a4!
May-01-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <louispaulsen88888888> Could you explain? What has White got after 15. a4 a6, for example?
May-05-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  louispaulsen88888888: After 15 a4 a6 :

1) -0.28 (49 ply) 16.Nbxd4 Nxd4 17.Nxd4 g5 18.hxg5 fxg5 19.Qf3+ Ke8 20.c3 Qh7 21.Bxg5 Rc8 22.Bh4 Qh5 23.Qxh5+ Rxh5 24.f4 Rc4 25.Red1 Bxa4 26.Rd2 Bd7 27.Kg2 Rh8 28.Bg5 Kf7 29.Rad1 a5 30.g4 a4 31.f5 Bxd4 32.Rxd4 Rhc8 33.f6 gxf6 34.Bxf6 a3 35.bxa3 Rxc3 36.R1d3 Bb5 37.Rxc3 Rxc3 38.a4 Bc6 39.Kf2 Ra3 40.a5 Rxa5 41.Bh4 Ra4 42.Rxa4 Bxa4 43.Ke2 Bd7 44.Kf3 b5

May-05-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <louispaulsen88888888> Is that engine analysis? Before I go carefully study that 30-move long line, I should point out that the eval at the end shows Black is slightly better.

So even if we completely accept this line, how does it show 14...Qg8 is a lemon? You think Black could have got a bigger advantage with a different move? If so, which move?

May-05-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  louispaulsen88888888: Apologies for calling it a lemon, but it has been given an exclamation mark in 2 books I have. It actually is just not the best move. And yes, that’s Stockfish. I decided to have the thing look at it because the queen move just didn’t look natural or correct to me.
May-05-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  louispaulsen88888888: Well, after having Stockfish go to 45 ply, I think it’s fair to say Qg8 might deserve a question mark after all. I retract my apology. It’s a lemon!

1) -2.12 (45 ply) 14...Bc7 15.Nbxd4 Nxe5 16.Rxe5 Bxe5 17.Nxe5+ fxe5 18.Nf3 Qf6 19.Qe2 e4 20.Ng5+ Kg8 21.c4 d4 22.Nxe4 Qf5 23.Bd2 Bc6 24.Re1 e5 25.Ng5 Re8 26.b4 a6 27.a4 Bxa4 28.b5 axb5 29.cxb5 Bb3 30.Qf3 Qxf3 31.Nxf3 Rh5 32.Nxd4 Bd5 33.f4 Kf7 34.fxe5 Rhxe5 35.Rxe5 Rxe5 36.Kf2 Be6 37.b6 Rc5 38.Kf3 Rc4 39.Ke4 Ra4 40.Ke5 Bg4 41.Be3

2) -1.88 (45 ply) 14...Rc8 15.Bf4 Qe8 16.Rad1 Kg8 17.Kg2 Qf7 18.Qe2 Rf8 19.Nc1 Bd8 20.Rh1 Rh5 21.Nd3 g5 22.g4 gxf4 23.gxh5 Qxh5 24.Rdg1 Rf7 25.Kf1 fxe5 26.Nfxe5 f3 27.Qe1 Nxe5 28.Qxe5 Qxe5 29.Nxe5 Bb5+ 30.Ke1 Rf5 31.Nd3 Bf6 32.h5 Kh7 33.Rh3 Bd7 34.Rgg3 e5 35.Rxf3 e4 36.Nc5 Rxf3 37.Rxf3 exf3 38.Nxd7 Kh6 39.Nxf6 gxf6 40.Kd2 Kxh5 41.Kd3 Kg4 42.Kxd4 Kh3 43.Ke3 Kg2 44.c3 f5 45.b3 f4+ 46.Kxf4

May-05-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: If it is not the best move, can you suggest a better one? I'm not seeing more than a slight Black advantage in the position in any case.

<the queen move just didn't look natural or correct> In the game, after a couple of indifferent moves by White, Black is able to play ...g5 with threats on the h-file and achieve a queen trade into a better endgame, which is probably why your books praise the move.

To avoid this, White should have started active play in the center similar to the line your engine found. But we have to consider the possible exchange sac, for example 15. Nbxd4 Bxd4 16. Nxd4 Nxe5 <17. Rxe5> fxe5 18. Nf3, which is unclear.

The same thing could happen in your engine line, because the 15. a4 a6 don't seem to change the situation in the center much. 15. a4 a6 16. Nbxd4 <Bxd4> (instead of your engine's ...Nxd4) 17. Nxd4 Nxe5. White still has the exchange sac with 18. Rxe5 and it's still unclear.

Of course, an engine can see farther than us and maybe it gives stronger than unclear eval to the exchange sac or finds some other resource for White here, and maybe throwing in 15. a4 a6 first makes it stronger somehow.

Is this what you believe? Because all that wasn't clear by reading <...Qg8 is a lemon, White should have responded 15. a4>.

May-05-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <louispaulsen88888888> Oh sorry, you posted your reply while I was still composing mine. It may take me some time now to respond to <Stockfish at 45 ply>, but White does have some other options in the lines you posted.
May-05-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  louispaulsen88888888: That’s true. It is complicated. And Botvinnik didn’t get to say “ hold on while I use this supercomputer from 80 years in the future”. And I likely wouldn’t find a decent plan if that were me!
May-06-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: Analysis of 14...Rc8 highlights one of the flaws of 14...Qg8.

On 14...Rc8, White's exchange sac idea doesn't work so well, because after 14...Rc8 15. Nbxd4 Bxd4 16. Nxd4 Nxe5 17. Rxe5 fxe5 18. Nf3 e4 19. Ne5+, here with Black's queen guarding the bishop and the g8 square open, Black can step out of the attack with <19...Kg8>.

May-07-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  louispaulsen88888888: Excellent point
Jun-07-25  Stolzenberg: <29. ... c1=Q>: deflection by pawn promotion just three days after 60. ... d1=Q at Smyslov vs Botvinnik, 1941

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC