chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Emanuel Lasker vs David Janowski
Lasker - Janowski World Championship Match (1910), Berlin GER, rd 3, Nov-12
Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense. Botvinnik Variation (D60)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 36 more Lasker/Janowski games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have annotation. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-06-07  Petrosianic: Definitely an unusual game. David I-Hate-The-Endgame Janowski plays very well, to hold a very long, very difficult ending. And in a match where he got stomped in almost every other game. A good study for learning about Q+P endings.
Sep-06-07  paul1959: Where do those opening names come from? This variation was played way before Botvinnik was born. I tought that Botvinnik's variation was in the semi-slav or Meran .
Sep-06-07  syracrophy: <paul1959: Where do those opening names come from? This variation was played way before Botvinnik was born. I tought that Botvinnik's variation was in the semi-slav or Meran .>

The openings take the name of the player that employs them on his games. Obviously, this opening was played before Botvinnik was born, but years later, he used it and maked it popular. Maybe it was used before by Lasker (as in this game's the case), but maybe Botvinnik played it more and worked strong on it

Sep-06-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: I don't see what's wrong with 63...Qxg2+. What am I missing?
Sep-07-07  paul1959: <beatgiant> Right. 63 Kg4 is probably a typo where Kf4 was meant. Then of course , 63...Qxg2 is met by 64 Qxf7+.
Mar-02-08  Knight13: It was already a dead draw on move 40. The rest is not so interesting.
Feb-09-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: What a long game.
Mar-20-14  Petrosianic: One thing I've never gotten here is why Janowski avoids the Queen exchange on Move 47, then goes for the Rook exchange on Move 50. The Rook and Pawn ending would have been easier to draw than the Queen and Pawn one.
Mar-20-14  Olavi: Good observation. Maybe that choice tells us something about the level of endgame knowledge at the time, unless of course it's just Janowski's personal thing.
Mar-20-14  Petrosianic: Janowski disliked endgame study. It was his opinion that a well played game should be decided before the ending. The problem is that when a game is well played on <both> sides, they often do go into endings.
Apr-18-14  Karpova: This game was adjourned after <31.Rxd5>, the <52nd> move,[1], <62.Qc7> [2] and <93.Qa3+>.[3]

[1] Dr. Emanuel Lasker, 'Pester Lloyd', 1910.11.14, p. 4

[2] Dr. Emanuel Lasker, 'Pester Lloyd', 1910.11.16, p. 6

[3] Dr. Emanuel Lasker, 'Pester Lloyd', 1910.11.19, p. 7

Feb-05-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Did the second session really last only ten moves?
Apr-15-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: The only game in the match that Lasker with white did not win; he was +5,-0,=1 with white.
Jun-07-17  RookFile: If you told somebody this was a Magnus Carlsen ending, he might believe you. Janovsky did well to hold this.
Jun-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Straclonoor: After 77th white move Lomonosov TB7 gives - draw.
Feb-26-18  Serpentin: Lasker gagne un pion un pion dans un gambit dame avec le fou en b7. mais ce pion constitue du 4:3 sur l'aile roi ce qui fait que techniquement avec D+T de chaque coté la finale sera a la fois longue, ardue et ttres difficile a gagner si cela était possible!
Nov-02-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: Lasker appears to have a win after Janowski's <90...Qe4+>, 90..Qd5 would have been better.

After 91.Kg5 Qd4


click for larger view

Lasker could have played:

<92. f6!> Kh7 (avoiding the discovered check) 93. Qh3+ Kg8 94. Qg4 Qc5+ (exchanging Queens loses mechanically in the pawn ending) 95. Kh6+ Kf8 96. Qg7+ Ke8


click for larger view

97. Qg8+ Kd7 98. Qxf7+ Kd8 99. Qe7+ Qxe7 100. fxe7+ Kxe7 101. g4 and wins as Black cannot stop the pawn from queening.

Playing <90. f6> would have also been strong, but it is an idea that neither player favoured at the board.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Queen vs Queen
from Endgames World champions - part one by Alenrama
7th longest. Who ever said Janowski couldn't put up a fight?
from Marathon WC games by rcs784
WCC: Lasker-Janowski 1910
by WCC Editing Project
Match Lasker!
by amadeus
Match Lasker!
by docjan
Game 3, Lasker leads 1-0 (2-1)
from 1910 World Chess Championship (second one) by Penguincw
January, p. 3 [Game 3 / 1039]
from American Chess Bulletin 1911 by Phony Benoni
Endgames
by AuDo
Queen vs Queen
from Endgames World champions - part one by brucemubayiwa
Lasker vs Janowski the challenger's only true good game
from marathon games by kevin86

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC