Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Garry Kasparov vs Anatoly Karpov
Karpov - Kasparov World Championship Match (1984/85), Moscow URS, rd 2, Sep-12
Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation. Polugayevsky Gambit (E17)  ·  1/2-1/2



explore this opening
find similar games 192 more Kasparov/Karpov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-12-04  Benjamin Lau: A very tense draw.
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: "Ten exclamation marks for Karpov, none for me; and still I make a draw! Amazing!"
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: 40...♘xf6! wins more or less immediately.

Analysis by Fritz 6:

1. (-5.22): 41.♘d4 ♘e4 42.♕h6 ♖5f7 43.♘c2 ♕b2 44.♗g2 ♘xf2 45.♘e1 ♕xa2

2. (-5.78): 41.♕e1 ♕xe1 42.♗xe1 hxg6 43.♗g2 ♘d5 44.♗d2 ♔g7 45.a4 ♘f4

3. (-6.19): 41.♕h6 ♘g8 42.♕h4 ♖xf2 43.♕xf2 ♖xf2 44.♖xg8+ ♔xg8 45.♔xf2 ♕xa2+

4. (-6.34): 41.♖g5 ♖xg5+ 42.♕xg5 ♖g8 43.♕xg8+ ♔xg8 44.♘e7+ ♔f7 45.♘f5 ♘e4

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: [Event "K-K I. World Chess Ch, Moscow 1984-5"]
[Site "Moscow, Hall of Columns"]
[Date "1984.09.12"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Kasparov, Garry"]
[Black "Karpov, Anatoly"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "E17"]
[WhiteElo "2715"]
[BlackElo "2705"]
[PlyCount "93"]
[EventDate “1984.09.09”]
Jun-25-05  waddayaplay: offramp -- it may have been time trouble. Unusual for Karpov, sure, but after such a game?
Nov-28-05  KingG: Does anyone here play this gambit against the Queen's Indian? Any opinions?
Nov-28-05  RookFile: I think Kasparov was fighting for a
draw here. This shows how tough it
was to become world champion. The
whole system was a refinement on
a system that Petrosian actually used
to use, and Kasparov won a number of
games with it. Needless to say, Karpov was ready for this when they met in 1984 for the championship match.
Nov-18-06  Fast Gun: If my memory serves me correctly here,
this was the 2nd game of the match: At this time Kasparov was still playing in his usual flamboyant style, this approach prior to this match served him well and was able to mow down many top grandmasters, but against Karpov this tactic was never going to succeed: The fact that he was 0-4 down after only nine games convinced him of this: From hereon Kasparov changed his tactics to a more solid position style like that of Karpov and was able to
put the brakes on and lost only one more game in the next 39!! Quite an achievement against the World champion who was used to winning regularly: I can only conjecture how long it would have taken for either player to score the required six wins for the title if the match had not been aborted and if Kasparov had played like he did from the beginning, it may well have taken 80 to 100 games before there could have been a result: This would prove just how far these two were ahead of the other top grandmasters and just how difficult it was for these two to defeat each other !!
Apr-11-08  Knight13: <KingG: Does anyone here play this gambit against the Queen's Indian? Any opinions?> I don't play this, but like most other gambits, White's trying to grab the initiative with it and leaving black with some passive pieces. Looking at this game, it's playable.
Jul-03-09  Knight13: 11...Nd6 and White gets to trade off one of his knights with a bishop, which is better in this open position. Also, after ...Bxd6 Qxd6 Black is temporarily restricted.
Aug-28-10  echever7: In a book by Karpov (!!)et al I had while living in Moscow there's a com about the position after 40.Rxg6 that says that Rxf2 wins. That's ridiculous. After 41.Qf2-hxg6 42.Qh4 Kg8 43.Qc4 the knight is lost. Black must struggle for a draw. Curiously in a Colombian newspaper (El Espectador) at that time the move they showed for black, before the adjourning, was that Rxf2. My little brother (12 at that time) found the not so difficult combination I posted above. "So my little brother refuted Karpov!" :O. I just cannot believe it. Next day the newspaper brought the right move, the correction, and a little analysis by Colombian chessplayers confirming why Rxf2 was an error. Four years later I arrived in Moscow bought that book read the com: "Rxf2 gives an easy win, because Kxf2 (Qxf2-hxg6) Nxf6 etc." I believe Karpov didn´t write that book.It was written with a colaborator (I don't remember who -Gik?-) But he didn't analyse this position for that book.
Dec-03-10  lopezexchange: Actually, 40...Rxf2 wins also (40...Nxf6 wins much faster though. For example 41.Qxf2,hxg6; 42.Qh4+,Kg8; 43. Qc4,Qxf6; 44.Qxd5+,Kh7; and black does not struggle for a draw at all. In fact it has a simple technical win here. For example 45.Qd7+,Rf7; 46.Qh3+,Kg7; 47.Qg2,Rf8; 49.Qe2,c4; now all that is left for black to do is to march the c pawn and force a queen exchange. 50.Qe5,Qxe5; 51.Nxe5,c3; 52.Nd3,Rd8; 53.Ne1,Rd1; and it is useless to continue. Black won.
Dec-04-10  technical draw: Hey, <lopezexchange> nice name you have there. Uh, you didn't steal it, uh, from someone say, like me? It's OK if you did but give me the credit.
Dec-04-10  lopezexchange: Hey, technical draw, i like your lopez exchange game collection. it is one of my most fearsome weapons too. 5...Qd6 is a pain to crack.

Back to the current game: horrible quality. Karpov had multiple wins in his hand, 4-5 at least. This low level quality is suspicious. It was also early in the match and fatigue cannot be used as an explanation.

Feb-16-12  Chesslover30: 40...R5xf6?? ... my God, such an error. I know it is clear to spot Nxf6 after an obvious and quite easy analyse with your mind clear, but at this level, when you are the world chess champion, I find it inadmissible, even with your flag hanging. No offense, but I wonder how many world chess champions would have done this move in such a situation. Kasparov may had many innacuracies in the games from 1984 WCM but he faught vigurously, he exploited the last drop from every game. Karpov had to put more pressure on Kasparov, especially after game 27 (come on, at 5-0!! you can afford a little risk and complications on the chessboard just to deliver once the final blow, not to wait for more childish mistakes that did not come anymore; it is crystal clear that this was not a good approach). And when you you think this game could might lead to an eventual 6-0. :). But despite these "little" mistakes we probably haven’t witnessed five awesome championship matches till 1990. Kasparov managed extremelly well the entire championship gaining experience with every game. Needless to to bring into discussion the tensions before the match and its "improper" outcome. Thank you.
Feb-18-12  Chesslover30: Ok, I think I was too harsh on my assesment (R5xf6??) after such a consumpting struggle in such a tense position, particularly in time trouble. Only after the game you realize the importance of one move in the economy of the match. In the first 9 games the amount of mistakes for a world championship was very high. After 4-0, I don't know who thought that Garry had a chance to turn the odds.
Dec-21-12  Shibin: g4 again! (in the first game it was in the 6th move). A move that lower-rated players wouldn't even consider for fear of weakening the kingside, GMs play with ease...

26.Rf3!an exchange sacrifice seemingly for nothing!now i know why Garry Kasparov is called the greatest player by many.

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: This brilliant game has an equally good avatar. Alekhine vs Capablanca, 1927 is so similar as to tempt one to suspect the machinations of the occult.

Black won the 1927 version, though.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
1984, Game 2
from Kasparov-Karpov by Penguincw
1984, Game 2
from Karpov World Championship Games by Penguincw
Complex games
by JoseTigranTalFischer
1984 Match Game 2
from AdrianP's Bookmarked Games by AdrianP
WCC Index [Karpov-Kasparov 1984/5]
by Resignation Trap
"Chess Genius Karpov" - Victor Baturinsky
by Karpova
dynamic middle game fizzles to a draw
from Karpov-Kasparov:the Titanic match by kevin86
by olpa
Game 6
from Modern Chess 2 (Kasparov) by Qindarka
"Chess Genius Karpov" - Victor Baturinsky
by SpaceRunner
by takba
QID Classical. Polugayevsky Gambit (E17) 1/2-1/2
from Karpov-Kasparov & Kasparov-Karpov by fredthebear
WCC 1984/5 [Karpov-Kasparov]
by foxmt
Essential Kasparov
by vonKrolock
Polugayevsky Gambit
from closed games by Camus
Book of Samurai's favorite games 8
by Book of Samurai
World Championship I Game #2
from Road to the Championship - Garry Kasparov (I) by Fischer of Men

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC