chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Nigel Short vs Garry Kasparov
Belfort World Cup (1988), Belfort FRA, rd 13, Jun-30
Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation. English Attack (B80)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 25 times; par: 54 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 91 more Short/Kasparov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you missed a Game of the Day, you can review the last year of games at our Game of the Day Archive.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-04-06  BlackNightmare: a true najdorf supergrand master
Nov-10-06  aazqua: I like the way Short chases Kaspy's pieces to better squares at the end of the game. Kaspy just makes it look too easy.
Mar-22-08  sallom89: i should study some more games like that!
Aug-26-08  sicilianhugefun: Bobby Fischer made the najdorf variation colorful and everything was sensationalizede by garry kasparov himself
Oct-25-11  DrMAL: Kasparov adopted his Scheveningen with Najdorf move order against Short who did not hesitate to go 9.g4 and castle long. 11...Nde5 instead of 11...Nxd4 invited 12.Nxc6 bxc6 with open b-file instead of c-file for counterattack. Short paid no attention to prophylaxis such as 14.Kb1 and went straight for g5. But then Short's inconsistent "finesse" 15.Ba7 merely lost a tempo, letting black equalize. Here is computer line for reference.

Houdini_20_x64: 32/80 12:13:17 461,289,041,783
0.00 15. ... Rb7 16.Bd4 Nd7 17.exd5 cxd5 18.f4 Qa5

Play followed line exactly, 19.Qe3 evaluates second to 19.h5 but difference is meaningless. But purpose of 19.Qe3 Nb8 is to go 20.Qe5 forcing 20...f6 (21.gxf6 Bxf6 22.Qd6) to trade Bs and Qs for draw. Instead, Short played aggressively with 20.f5 but this favored black. 20.Qe5 threatens mate so that black cannot go 20...Nc6 (20...f6 was forced). Here, 20...Nc6 threatens B which cannot move, forcing 21.f6 which is artificial threat because after 21...Nxd4 black has check on e2 so that 21.fxe7 Nxe2+ 23.Qxe2 Re8 loses white pawn. It is interesting that computer evaluates this pawn sac as OK anyway because of 22...Bc5!

Houdini_20_x64: 28/68 39:28 24,651,543,579
-0.49 22.fxe7 Nxe2+ 23.Qxe2 Re8 24.Rd3 Qb4 25.b3
-0.52 22.Qxd4 Bc5 23.Qe5 g6 24.Kb1 Qb4 25.b3

However, Short took B with R instead of Q, 22.Rxd4?! where 22...Bc5! is even stronger, pinning R to Q. Both played out line afterwards accurately until Short again played inconsistent move 24.Rhd1?! instead of 24.h5 or 24.Qf4 to continue attack. Kasparov played 24...Qb4! again best move, threatening b2 then with beautiful 25...e5! decided game 26.Qxe5 was best but loses.

Rest of game is interesting but not as instructive, Kasparov had B for two connected passed pawns but power of his pieces in endgame was already decisive. Game was sophisticated both players being genius attackers in sharp doubled-edged battle. But Kasparov was simply both more accuarate and perfectly consistent, either quality was probably enough for eventual victory but game here demonstrated superiority of his technique in both areas. In such a game it is critical to be 100% focused.

Oct-25-11  anandrulez: Nice analysis DrMal , would 15 f4 be better ? What are the good alternatives ? Black already is gathering steam on the White and looks like Kasparov is better ?
Oct-25-11  SimonWebbsTiger: 15. f4 was awarded a question mark by Kasparov in Informator (ref. 45/266). He gave <15.f4? Nd7 16. f5 Qa5 with the idea Ba3>. Instead, GK thought <15.Na4! Nd7 16. c4! with the idea Qc2> was better and unclear.

I think Short must have overlooked 15. Ba7 Rb7 16. Bd4 Nd7 17. exd5 cxd5 18. Bxa6 Rxb2!

Oct-25-11  DrMAL: Thanx <anandrulez> yes, very astute! 15.f4! was even in my notes from 1988, it is better way to attack but I did not mention (then be compelled to go into) because I wanted to focus on instruction from Kasparov technique. In any case, black's Najdorf Scheveningen should have held draw in absence of clear mistakes. Short played some inaccuracies (e.g., obvious 22.Rxd4?!) but was also not fully consistent (15.Ba7 and, worse, 24.Rhd1?!). Kasparov played mistake before with this defense in his important Karpov vs Kasparov, 1985 (see analysis there on how) but game was too high pressure for Karpov this and his fallback (due to style) on 23.Be3? blew chance of win.
Oct-25-11  DrMAL: Sorry I meant 14.f4! not 15.f4 after 15.f4 Nd7 then 16.f5 or 16.h5 and position is equal. 16.f5 Qa5 17.f6 and if 17.Ba3 as <SWT> posted then crazy looking 17...Nb5 is only move but gives equality. This was not considered (computer showed me too). Best was 15.h5 Qa5 16.Kb1 or simply 15.Kb1 for very slight edge. 15.Ba7 was just inconsistent, it tried to discoordinate black pieces with 15...Rb7 blocking B (15...Rb4 was almost as good anyway) but failed to do anything other than lose a tempo.
Oct-25-11  ismet: english variation is chosen a few times for players . It is too dangareous for black if white plays well and too dangerous for white if black plays well and most enjoyable match and there are too risks for white and black so they do not choose that
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Early 0-0 with Nd7
from Sicilian Najdorf by anjyplayer
Play The Najdorf Sicilian
by jakaiden
Game 39
from Part 2: 1985-1993 (Kasparov) by Qindarka
Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen. English Attack (B80) 0-1
from Sicheveningen Invited Fredthebear by fredthebear
Kasparov Najdorf games
by vedimitrov
SCHEVENINGEN GTM
by gambitfan
Sicilian Najdorf
by Cannon Fodder
13
from TRENDS Sicilian Najdorf (Gallagher) by Chessdreamer
The Sicilian Defense
by Timothy Glenn Forney
Play The Najdorf Sicilian
by SantGG
Round Thirteen, Game #99
from Belfort World Cup 1988 by suenteus po 147
Play The Najdorf Sicilian
by ttavenner
039
from Garry KASPAROV on Garry KASPAROV II 1985-1993 by beta
Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation. English Attack
from MKD's Sicilian Defense Black by MKD
Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation. English Attack
from KASPAROV GAMES GTM by gambitfan
Najdorf - 6. Be3
by pcmvtal
The Sicilian Defense
by ramessolo
Sharp Sicilians
by OneBadDog
Sicillian Defense
by Zhbugnoimt
Kasparov The Killer!!
by Zhbugnoimt
plus 14 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC