chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Wilhelm Steinitz vs Lang
"Auld Lang Resign" (game of the day Jan-01-2006)
Casual game (1860), Vienna, Feb-05
King's Gambit: Accepted. Blachly Gambit (C37)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 140 times; par: 25 [what's this?]

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35434 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more Steinitz/Lang games
sac: 6.c3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can suggest a game for Guess-the-Move with the Guess-the-Move Suggestion Queue.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  cu8sfan: Lol! The puns, the puns! I assume this is just the beginning of another year with great puns.
Jan-01-06  Caro.K.4.me: Wow!

that kid Lange must've hae tak'n too many pint-stowps. <hic!>

11.Rxf8 is so punny!

Beware the Spooky Steinitz Storm!Ooooo!

Jan-01-06  weisyschwarz: <Chessgames>, is black Lang or is it Max Lange? I am getting crossed signals.
Jan-01-06  kevin86: I've heard this game referred to as the WILD MUZIO,because white sacs the bishop at f7 as well as the knight at f3. Mr. Lang was either a rank duffer or the most courageous man on earth--accepting the Muzio vs Steinitz! I believe the former,unfortunately.
Jan-01-06  Caro.K.4.me: I misspelled. sorry <weisy> :)

I think he was a duffer only they must've played at a pub in those days, all day long in pubs meant drinking lots, it wasn't like organized weekend tournaments nowadays.

Jan-02-06  weisyschwarz: <Caro.K.4.me> it isn't just you, unless you submitted this game, I guess. Even on the board (misty beach--java viewer) it lists black as M. Lange.
Jan-09-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: I used to play over "The Game of the Day" ... every single day. Then - about two months ago - I got out of the habit. (I guess the hectic holiday season? Or maybe any excuse will do.)

I just noticed the title of this game. ("Auld Lang Resign.") Bravo! (I laughed out loud!!!)

Jan-09-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: Of course the game itself was a massacre. (Great play by Steinitz!)
Mar-31-06  McCool: For a minute there I thought Steinitz didn't know what he was doing.
Mar-18-08  InspiredByMorphy: If your going to play 7. ...fxg2 don't play 8. ...Kxf7
Mar-18-08  RookFile: The whole game was basically a book line known to Steinitz, before he even pushed the first pawn.
Mar-18-08  brankat: <RookFile> So? If anything, this proves Bobby was right when he called Steinitz "the first modern player."

The game also shows young Steinitz was more than capable of playing "open games".

Mar-18-08  blackburne: The black not is Lang. Is Max Lange. Steinitz play a match with Max Lange in Vienna in 1860.
Mar-13-09  outplayer: 11.Rxf8+! was hard to find cause I wanted to win the queen with 11.Rf7+?. I forgot that in those days the masters didn't play for material.
Mar-13-09  apoka: 14...♔c5 is quite an ugly move. Black is under a heavy attach and its Knight is threatened. It would be wise to move it, instead of pushing the king over the board. 14...♘e5 also prevents 15. ♘c4.

Overall, that's an interesting game. It appears to be quite random, but most of the moves seem to make sense. :-) Many amateurs may be tempted to play similar moves as Black did here.

Jun-20-09  WhiteRook48: pretty finish
Aug-14-09  nd792001: best pun ever
May-28-10  DCLawyer: After playing this game, I checked the moves with Fritz 8. A number of bad errors on both sides. But most disturbing is that points are actually deducted for choosing moves that are at least as good as Steinitz's (e.g., 5.0-0 vs. 5.d4) or that clearly are better (11.Rf2 or 11.Rf3 as opposed to 11.Rxf8?). What's up with that?
Oct-14-10  Spasskyfan22: Stenitz is my kinda dude..
Oct-14-10  ughaibu: Guess the move score: 40
Jul-23-11  Owerbart: Anyone saw any alternative to 14 ... Kc5?
Jan-19-13  RandomVisitor: Black has to consider options like 7...Qe7, 7...d5, 7...Qh4, 7...Bh6, 7...d6, 7...Nf6, 7...Qf6 which reduce white's counterplay and likely preserve an advantage.
Jan-19-13  RandomVisitor: Black could give a piece back with possible drawing chances, after sequences like 14...Ne5 15.Bxh6 Qf6; 14...Ng4 15.Qxg4 Ne5; 14...Na5 15.Bxh6 Qf6
Apr-26-21  Dhirajk2021: The assault begins from the 8th move!!
May-07-24
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: <RandomVisitor> Incredible that at the time of your post, you didn't mention Ne5 seems to refute White's play. Engines have come a very long way to show refutations of gambits - which is another argument away from the Romantic era of chess and towards slow and steady accumulation of advantages.

9: Wilhelm Steinitz - Lang 1-0 0.0, Casual game Vienna AUH 1860


click for larger view

Analysis by Stockfish 16 - one thread version:

1. -+ (-2.52): 8.dxe5 Bc5+ 9.Kh1 fxg2+ 10.Kxg2 Nh6 11.Qh5 Rg8+ 12.Kh1 d5 13.Bb5+ c6 14.Qxh6 cxb5 15.Bxf4 Qd7 16.Bg3 Qh3 17.Qxh3 Bxh3 18.Rf6 h5 19.Nd2 h4 20.Nb3 Be3 21.Bf2 Black has a decisive advantage

(Gavriel, 07.05.2024)

It is the act of human research itself to find resources which meant the end of the Romantic era - but for online blitz chess such gambtits are fine :) Steinitz had a good point with his equilibrium theory of chess.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC