chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Alexander Kotov vs Samuel Reshevsky
Zurich Candidates (1953), Zurich SUI, rd 23, Oct-11
Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 7 times; par: 112 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Kotov/Reshevsky game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-30-06  SnoopDogg: Clever Endgame by Kotov.
Apr-03-10  tonsillolith: What did Kasparov have to say about this game in My Great Predecessors? I'm guessing the section was about Reshevsky and not about Kotov. Was he remarking on a certain weakness of Reshevsky's?
Apr-03-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <tonsillolith> His main point was that Reshevsky shot himself in the foot at the tournament with this game and Reshevsky vs Geller, 1953. If you have Bronstein's book of the tournament, his notes on this game are wonderful.
Apr-04-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  wordfunph: Kotov-Reshevsky


click for larger view

engine suggested 55...Kc7 ( 1.12) but Sammy decided on 55...Nb1 ( 1.45)

the game was even-steven until white took a slight advantage with 54.Nxg4

Apr-04-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <wordfunph>

<the game was even-steven until white took a slight advantage with 54.Nxg4>

That doesn't make sense. White can't "take" an advantage out of thin air; Black has to make a mistake. The engine may not have perceived White's advantage until 54.Nxg4 was played, but that is not the same thing.

Feb-25-16  ZonszeinP: Exactly! Before that, the engine didn't have a clue...:)
Aug-04-17  cwcarlson: 52.♔e3 ♘c3 53.♔d3 ♘b1 54.♔c2 ♘a3+ 55.♔b2+- Bronstein; 54.c5+ bc 55.bc+ ♔c5 56.fg+- Houdini 5.
Sep-16-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: A couple of rounds earlier Petrosian had played 11 Rad1 against Najdorf and the game was drawn after a few moves; 11 e4 was new and was an improvement. Starting with 29 Qg4 White was outmaneuvered allowing Black to obtain promising play. 35 f4? was very weakening and could have cost White the game. White probably overlooked that had he played 36 h3 Black could have responded with the powerful 36..e5!. With 37..Rd8? Reshevsky missed the opportunity to get a powerful attack with 37..f5! 38 Qf3..e5 39 h3..e4 40 Qe2..Nf6 41 Nf1..h4. With 50..a4?! Reshevsky was playing for a win but subsequent events showed that he misjudged the position. Reshevsky must have missed Kotov's pretty 52 Ke3!. Still, Reshevsky would have had good drawing chances after 54..Nxg3 55 Nf2..Nf1+ 56 Kd3..e5 57 fxe+..Kxe5 58 Nd1..f4 59 Nc3..f3 60 Nxa4..f2 61 Ke2..Nd2 62 Nxf2..Nxc4; instead he continued his ill-advised plan of going after the a-pawn with 54..Nc3?!. After 57 b5! the knight was trapped (57 Kc3..b5 would have led to a draw). 57..Kc5 58 Nd7+..Kb4 59 Nxb6..Nb1 60 Nxa4..Kxa4 61 b6 would also have been winning for White.

Played in the 23rd (out of 30) round; entering the round Reshevsky was neck and neck with Smyslov. This game plus missing a win against Geller followed by losing to Smyslov in round 25 ended his hopes.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Round Twenty-Three, Game 156
from WCC Index [Zurich 1953] by Atsa
Game 15
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (4) by AdrianP
Game 15
from On My Great Predecessors 4 (Kasparov) by isfsam
Game 15
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (4) by nakul1964
Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14) 1-0 Ns ending
from EG Minors Excavating the Elements by fredthebear
Game 15
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (4) by demirchess
Round Twenty-Three, Game 156
from WCC Index [Zurich 1953] by TigerTiger
Game 156
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by Qindarka
Instructive chess endgames I
by wwall
Game 15
from On My Great Predecessors 4 (Kasparov) by Qindarka
Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14) 1-0 Ns ending
from f6 again? by fredthebear
Round Twenty-Three, Game 156
from WCC Index [Zurich 1953] by JoseTigranTalFischer
Game 156
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by MSteen
Round Twenty-Three, Game 156
from WCC Index [Zurich 1953] by suenteus po 147
Game 156
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by isfsam
good endgame
from Games to review by Gambit86
Game 156
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by Baby Hawk
Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14) 1-0 Ns ending
from French: Instructive Games Compilation by Patca63


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC