chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Alexander Kotov vs Ratmir Kholmov
"Kotov Arms" (game of the day May-16-2013)
Moscow Team Championship (1971), Moscow URS, Dec-??
Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 10 times; par: 47 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 5 more Kotov/Kholmov games
sac: 26.Rxc5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-16-13  kevin86: Black could fight on,but his pieces are uncoorinated and the pawns are weak-so why bother?
May-16-13  Abdel Irada: <greystar69: <Marco65> Are you saying that you found this puzzle as easy as Pi(e)?>

Yes, but only to the 14th decimal place.

The real test is not pi but /i/. Only those who can solve the puzzle in less than √-1 seconds are admitted to the innermost circle.

(And if you can manage to solve it in both ∏ *and* √-1 seconds, you may fairly call yourself pi-/i/ed.)

May-16-13  howlwolf: I don't know about math humor.
May-16-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Not many people understand math humor. That figures.
May-17-13  whiteshark:

If you understand math humor you probably don't have friends. http://tetrahedral.blogspot.de/2012... ;)

May-17-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Q: What did the absolute value integer say to his detractors?

A: I'm always positive!

May-17-13  Abdel Irada: <HeMateMe: Q: What did the absolute value integer say to his detractors?

A: I'm always positive!>

This is true until the detractors become subtractors and reduce his value to zero.

May-17-13  diceman: <Phony Benoni: Not many people understand math humor.>

Its easy as Pi.

May-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: <Benoni> I liked your link to math/engineering jokes. Especially the "not my job" road striper photo.
May-18-13  Abdel Irada: I rather liked the cartoon depicting a discussion between /i/ and pi.

</i/: "Be rational."

pi: "Get real.">

Aug-04-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: OK, we've got a bishop pinning a bishop here. That usually works out better if the bishop is pinning a rook, so look at 26.Rxc5 Rxc5 27.Rc2 Rfc8. Now we can only reinforce with the queen, and can only do that by the ridiculous 28.Qb5. Wait a second: that's a cross pin situation.

So: <26.Rxc5 Rxc5 27.Rc2 Rfc8 28.Qb5 Rxc5 29.Rxc8+ Kf7 30.Bxa7>, and that looks like an extra piece.

Aug-04-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: < Phony Benoni: Not many people understand math humor. >

Same goes for fractions; 3 out of 2 people don't understand them.

---

Entering this puzzle, I was 3/2 on the week and month. As a result, I spent some extra time trying to solve this puzzle. Normally, me trying to solve a mid or late week puzzle is like a circle: pointless. (damn, all these math puns, that ain't good: math puns are the first sine of madness)

I did not get it though. I should've gotten it, as it looks pretty easy. I did come up with moves such as 26.Bxg7 and 26.Bxc5.

3/4 this week and month.

Aug-04-16  thegoodanarchist: There is only one math joke that is actually funny. If you want, I will tell it
Aug-04-16  nalinw: %^^&*&**(

I got up to the reload with Rc2 but just didn't see Qb5. Instead I was looking for ways to swing over to a king side attack.

Aug-04-16  YouRang: Meh - I missed it. Didn't see 28.Qb5! as the winning continuation, but indeed, whichever way it goes, white comes out a piece to the good.
Aug-04-16  knutinge: Ich finde fast immer die Lösung bei Schachproblemen, weil ich weiß, dass etwas geht! In einer Turnierpartie hätte ich es NIE gefunden!
Warum bloß?
Aug-04-16  nasher: Ok <thegoodanarchist>, what is the joke ?
Aug-04-16  gofer: Looked at this one for a while. I realised eventually that move order is key because there is no point trying to exploit the pin until it exists, so moves like <26 a3> fail to <26 ... Bxd4>. So this means that it is necessary to play Rxc5 immediately to set up the pin first. After that we have to work if we can exploit the pin we have made, can we either bring more forces to attack the pinned piece or exploit the position of our opponents supporting pieces. This pin is the latter. Only Rf8 can come to support the pinned Rc5 and that is only from c8 where it can be taken without losing tempo due to the check. So we get the simple combination...

<26 Rxc5 Rxc5>
<27 Rc2 Rc8>

Now we just need to exploit the pinned piece one more time and the pin will work...

<28 Qb5! ...>

The rest is history, the best black can hope for is being in a Q+B v 2R end game, which is not going to be easy to survive...

Aug-04-16  gofer: knutinge: <Pattern Recognition>

Sie müssen diese einfachen Muster lernen können sie in Ihre Spiele zu nutzen...

oder

Sie müssen lernen zu gehen, bevor Sie ausführen können lernen!

Aug-04-16  agb2002: The material is identical.

Black threatens Bxd4 and Rxa2.

White can exploit the position of the black queen with 26.Rxc5 Rxc5 27.Rc2 Rc8 28.Qb5:

A) 28... Rxc2 29.Bxa7 Rxa2 30.Bc5 (due to 30... Rc8# and 30... Rxa7)

A.1) 30... Rac2 31.Bd4 + - [Q+B vs 2R+P] (threatens Qd7 and Qxb4; 31... Raa2 32.Qe8#).

A.2) 30... Ra1+ 31.Kf2 doesn't seem to change anything.

B) 28... Rxb5 29.Rxc8+ Kf7 30.Bxa7 Ra5 31.Bc5 Rxa2 32.Bxb4 followed by Rc3 + - [B].

C) 28... R8c7 29.Qe8#.

D) 28... Kf7 29.Bxc5 Qc7 30.Qxb4 + - [B+P].

Aug-04-16  morfishine: <26.Rxc5>
Aug-04-16  zb2cr: Found this one quickly. Takes real confidence to play this kind of combination.
Aug-04-16  LlanelliCC: Gofer. Exactly. You start early and learn thousands of patterns, like the one in today's puzzle, and then they become automatic when you play in a real game.
Aug-04-16  Once: This is one of those "I want to, I can't, I can" sort of puzzles.

From the opening position, the move that we really want to play is 26. Rxc5. This would replace the black bishop on c5 (which can't be pinned diagonally) with a black rook (which can). So that leads us to 26. Rxc5 Rxc5:


click for larger view

Now that the black Rc5 is pinned we follow the usual prescription of adding more pressure to the pin. That leads us to 27. Rc2 Rfc8


click for larger view

White attacks c5 for a second time. Black defends it for a second time. Now white wants to be able to attack c5 for a third time.

You see, there is a basic unfairness in chess. All other things being equal, the attacking side can sometimes attack a pinned piece with more pieces than can defend it. This is because the pinned piece can't defend itself. So if material is level, the attacker can find that he has an extra piece.

This doesn't always work - opposite coloured bishops can mess it up - but it often applies.

But white has a problem. He would like to add his queen into the attack, but there's no obvious way to do this. For example, he would like to warp his queen to d6 or capture on b4. Unfortunately these all take time to arrange - time that white doesn't have because black can easily unpin himself with a move like Qa5.

That's when your eye falls on the move 28. Qb5.


click for larger view

If it works it will add an extra attacker to the pinned Rc5. That's the "I want" part of the puzzle. I want to be able to play 28. Qb5.

We might be tempted to reject 28. Qb5 out of hand because it puts two pieces en prise - the white queen and the white rook. That's the "I can't" phase.

If we look a little deeper, we see that white wins material whichever way black captures. If 28...Rxc5 white doesn't play the disastrous 29. Bxa7 Rxc2. Instead he plays the zwischenzug 29. Rxc8+ Kf7 and only then 30. Bxa7

Or the game continuation when black finds himself with 2R vs Q+B, where the white queen and bishop pair will hoover up all the weak black pawns.

So our Qb5 is an "I can" after all.

Aug-04-16  patzer2: Black's 25...Qa7? meets with disaster in the form of a pinning combination starting with 26. Rxc5!, which also solves today's Thursday puzzle.

The follow-up move 28. Qb5! is available to put pressure on the pinned piece because of the in-between move (a.k.a. zwischenzug or intermezzo) threat 28...Rxb5 29. Rxc8+ Kf7 30. Bxa7 which leaves White a piece up (i.e. extra Bishop).

Instead of 25...Qa7?, allowing 26. Rxc5! , Black should have played 25...Rfa8 = (0.17 @ 22 depth, Deep Fritz 15).

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC