chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Frank Marshall vs David Gladstone
Manhattan CC v Marshall CC (1932), New York, NY USA
Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense. Main Line (D63)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Frank Marshall.      [9 more games annotated by Marshall]

explore this opening
find similar games 1,383 more games of Marshall
sac: 21.Qxg7 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-16-03  Shadow 812: Another one of those Marshall wins with a rip-roaring attack against the enemy King: But where did Gladstone go wrong? Well on move 17 it would have been better to recapture on f6 with the Knight instead of the Bishop: But In my
opinion he went wrong on move 18 with
Rd8?? This looks like a natural move to
deal with the threat of mate, but was shown by Marshall to be found wanting. The correct way would have been
18.Bb1 Re8!!(A difficult move to find)
19.Qh7+ Kf8 (Forced)
20.Qh8+ Ke7 (Forced)
21.Qxg7 Bxh4
22.Qxf7+ Kd8 (Safe)
Also
22.Rxf7+ Kd8 (Holds)
Another possibility for White on move 21 instead of Qxg7 was Bxf6: For example
21.Bxf6+ Nxf6
22.Qxg7 Qxe3+
23.Rf2 Qg5
24.Qxg5 hxg (With Queens off the board
Black is safe from all danger)
and finally
21.Bxf6+ gxf
22.Qxh6 Bb7=
Admittedly 18.Re8 was a hard move to find and difference between having the Rook on e8 instead of d8 was subtle, but crucial in the final analysis.
Feb-28-06  Fast Gun: Having played through this game and the comments from Marshall, he is mistaken when he says that 17.Nxf6 is a satisfactory defence, Fritz gave on move 18 Re8 as the best move, as suggested by Shadow, hindsight with a computer more than 60 years later is useful analytical tool:
Feb-28-06  blingice: <Shadow 812> After your first combination:


click for larger view

Is this a draw?

Your second line, just with the deviation of rook taking rather than queen, was black's line a draw or only a preventative move?

The third line ends so:


click for larger view

Is this better for black or for white? White still has the tempo and initiative, although he is a piece down. I'd like to see this game finish.

Your fourth line ends so:


click for larger view

This doesn't yet look like a draw. Any computer analysis on this position?

Oct-09-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: <The last five moves give a good idea of the queen's power> Indeed.

21. Qxg7! is very nice.

Dec-27-17  Albion 1959: A colourful little game, with another one of those attacks that Marshall was able to conjour up and pull off against the lesser players. Had the opponent been Lasker or Capablanca, I am sure that they would have stepped carefully through the tactics and they would have won. Especially when you consider Marshall's record against them only four "official" wins in something like fifty odd games? As for this game, Nxf6 on move 17 was better than Bxf6. However, it was on move 18 where Gladstone faltered with Rd8? That allowed the attack to breakthrough. I looked at another possibility here
18.Bb1 g6 (Instead of Rd8)
19.Bxf6 Qxe3+
20.Kh1 Nxf6
21.Rxf6 Qe5
22.Rf2 The rook must retreat since
22.Rxg6+? Fails to
22. fxg
23.Qxg6+ Qg7
Black has two pawns for the knight and the attack is over. Though the material advantage should eventually prevail. The second and more difficult defence for Black is 18.Bb1 Re8
19.Qh7+ Kf8
20.Qh8+ Ke7
21.Qxg7 Leads to the Shadow 812 analysis, which appears to hold up, but is not an easy line. Can Black do better here?
Nov-27-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Retireborn: Does Marshall's book (My 50 years) give any info about the date this game was played?
Nov-27-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: ***

Just says it was the Metropolitan Chess League, 1932.

The Soltis book does not have it.

270 games in the Soltis book and 'My 50' has 140 games.

I make it 82 games are in both books.

Soltis notes with the same charm as Marshall and has more background. I have a few of Soltis books and even though it includes more than a few Marshall losses, this one is a labour of love. You can clearly see he enjoyed writing it. I'm lapping up every game.)

***

Nov-27-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Retireborn: Thanks, Geoff. Glad you're enjoying it!

Dunno if it's in either book, but this game is one of my favourites:-

Nimzowitsch vs Marshall, 1927

Good old Nimzo hoist with his own Indian :)

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
87
from Veliki majstori saha 14 MARSHALL (Petrovic) by Chessdreamer
temp
by musicalhair
Frank James Robbed Banks and Kings
by fredthebear
127.
from MARSHALL'S BEST GAMES OF CHESS/hitsujyun by fredthebear
Annotated Games
by Morphischer
lopium's favorite games
by lopium
queen's gambit declined/orthodox defense
from benjobench's game collection by benjobench
Marshall Martials
by chocobonbon
127.
from MARSHALL'S BEST GAMES OF CHESS by hitsujyun
zakir's favorite games marshall annotate
by zakir
Game 127
from My Fifty Years of Chess (Marshall) by Qindarka
Amusing Games
by Jaredfchess
Cacería del rey
from TVCHESS3JAQUES's favorite games by TVCHESS3JAQUES
Annotated Games
by balasana128
Checkmate 1930-1939
by Chessdreamer
Game 127
from My Fifty Years of Chess (Marshall) by fphaase
Amusing Games
by sleepyirv
Les Prix de Beauté aux Echecs (II)
by Sleeping kitten

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC