chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Siegbert Tarrasch vs Harry Pillsbury
Monte Carlo (1903), Monte Carlo MNC, rd 5, Feb-16
Scandinavian Defense: Ilundain Variation (B01)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35434 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 12 more Tarrasch/Pillsbury games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-12-09  birthtimes: Lasker writes, "Black has not played the opening to the best advantage, and his last move [8...Bd6] is weak. White threatened to cut off the retreat of the g4 bishop by Ng3; hence, Bh5 was here the reply."

10...Bxg3 "should lose. The lesser evil was 10...Bh5."

After 11. hxg4, "The rook file being open, g5-g6 is threatening."

After 16...g6 "Black, in his three pawns plus, has a material equivalent for the White bishop, but White has an enormous start in development.

Therefore, White had to attack. Where? On the queenside, where White is clearly superior; by no means on the kingside, where the Black pawns have it all their own way.

The target for the attack...is c6. After 17. b4 White threatened immediately b5. If 17...a6 18. a4 whereupon b5 cannot be prevented, the Black queenside pawns are sure to be weakened and the supremacy of the White pieces decides the fight long before the Black pawns can get into action.

White adopted this plan only after losing much valuable time; he lost his superiority in development, and the game was eventually drawn."

Lasker's Manual of Chess, 1960, pp. 284-285.

Aug-25-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  dernier loup de T: Pyschology in chess? Maybe Tarrasch was upset after the unsound but violent attack of Pillsbury from the 10th move, and decided to pay his agressor with his own money by 17.Rh6 instead of the strategically more methodic 17.b4.... Let's notice that the play of Pillsbury is again too risky at move 40: 40...Ra2 was more prudent, and after the played move 40...g5?!, Tarrasch had chances to win the endgame by 41. Ra8!?, but it was difficult to calculate all following variations...

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC