chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Judit Polgar vs Vladimir Kramnik
Dos Hermanas (1997), Dos Hermanas ESP, rd 6, Apr-08
French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 5 times; par: 65 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 44 more Judit Polgar/Kramnik games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-30-04  lebohang: kramniks positional sense in this french is just supreme
Dec-04-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: You don't see Kramnik play the French very often. Polgars choice of the Exchange variation is also a departure.

The most striking move in the game is 9..Be6!?. Kramnik accepts a crippled e pawn in exchange for an open f file and increased control of d5. I suspect most grandmasters would not make make such a move. Club players would also avoid it as it breaks so many rules. Polgar gets a good position so perhaps it was a miscalculation. Kramnik says that after 19 Qd3 or 19 Rc1 Polgar would have a significant advantage. Psakhis says that after 19 Qd3..Qd5 black is OK but he must have overlooked 20 Rg5 which appears to win on the spot. 21 d5 is a speculative pawn sacrifice which turns out badly; not sure what Polgar missed. After the second speculative pawn sacrifice 26 c5 Kramnik wins in routine fashion.

Jun-25-07  openingspecialist: i think that its good to see white lose in exchange french. I hate it when people do cheap exchange tactics in the french and try to draw. Yesturday I had the great pleasure of having the same honour Kramnik did this day in 1997. Why play for a draw as white? It is stupid.
Jun-25-07  micartouse: <Why play for a draw as white? It is stupid.> I think there's an incorrect stereotype that White is playing for a draw if he plays the Exchange French. The reason most players use it is because they enjoy simple symmetrical open positions and because it usually annoys the opponent. It's like any other opening - the better player will usually win.
Jun-25-07  euripides: The exchange variation with c4 is not a drawing attempt. It gives Black the option to inflict the isolated d pawn on White, producing a sharp line like the Panov-Botvinnik attack in the Caro-Kann. For a more successful example which might have been in the players' minds see Kramnik vs Judit Polgar, 1996
Jun-25-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: What micarthouse said. Even Kasparov played the Exchange French a few times. Morphy never played anything else.

Besides, if Polgar wanted a draw here she wouldn't have tried 7. c4, as euripides pointed out.

Jun-07-11  theagenbiteofinwit: This is one of my favorite games. Kramnik clearly isn't playing for a draw with 9..Be61? He isolates a pawn, but he gets mad activity for doing so.

Even if white declines to move the bishop for the 3rd time in the opening by playing 10.B3, black can just continue with a lead in development with 10..Qd7 11.Nc3 Bb4 and white is stuck defending an IQP against some very well-placed pieces.

Black's lead in development makes it relatively easy to fend off white's kingside assault.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
with Nf3
from French Exchange - black by jeta
French Defence: Beating the Exchange Variation
by BntLarsen
French Def: Exchange 7.c4 dxc4 IQP (C01) 0-1 Stockfish notes
from Book Master Bob Long Helped Fredthebear BackWhen by fredthebear
Round Six, Game #28
from Dos Hermanas 1997 by suenteus po 147
French - Advance/Tarrasch/Exchange/etc
by gmann
French Def: Exchange 7.c4 dxc4 IQP (C01) 0-1 Stockfish notes
from Flashback to the Summer of 19XY by fredthebear
exchange variation
from French Defense by JoseTigranTalFischer
exchange variation
from French Defense by builttospill
French Defence: Beating the Exchange Variation
by KLN1973
Exchange Variation
from All Time Greats Play the French w/Black & Win by JoseTigranTalFischer


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC