chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Carl Schlechter vs Emanuel Lasker
"Helter Schlechter" (game of the day Jan-07-2022)
Lasker - Schlechter World Championship Match (1910), Vienna AUH, rd 5, Jan-22
Spanish Game: Berlin Defense. Closed Bernstein Variation (C66)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 29 times; par: 92 [what's this?]

Annotations by Jose Raul Capablanca.      [26 more games annotated by Capablanca]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 18 more Schlechter/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-28-11  Llawdogg: Carl "Hannibal" Schlechter showed that he had the skills and the killer instincts to defeat Lasker and become the World Chess Champion. Go Hannibal Schlechter!
Jan-29-11  AnalyzeThis: He starved to death. I remember reading one book that said "poor, half-famished Schlechter - what a great fighter he was!"
Jan-29-11  BobCrisp: Ilmar Raud is also said to have died alone, cold, hungry, scared, forgotten....
Dec-10-11  TheMacMan: black had great position until time blunder
Mar-19-13  jszigeti: Referring to the above:
"This is Schlechter’s first and only win in this match and the second and last time he ever defeated Lasker. But Lasker didn’t equalize until the final game (game 10), thereby retaining the world title, probably to his surprise if his public comments the day before are any guide."

The part about "thereby retaining the world title," is missing some critical detail. (Reference: Evans on Chess 1974 pg. 42) Lasker had match conditions that specified that he would retain the title unless Schlechter won by two points until a return match. (Compare that to Botvinnik, and Fischer conditions later on !) Thus Schlechter uncharacteristically went all out to get the extra point but lost instead. Lasker would have retained the title with a draw as well albeit with a slight string attached, a return match that most likely never would have happened between Lasker's artful avoidance of the most dangerous challenges (e.g. Akiba Rubenstein at his peak, and Capablanca for as long as possible by means of diffcult match conditions) and the interference of WWI when Schlechter would die before it ended.

Nov-25-15  offramp: <thebribri8: I hate Capablanca's annotations.>

Some players aren't designed for annotations. They look at a position and they think, "It's pretty obvious what's going on here... There's no need to mention the alternatives here, it's obvious..." and they end up writing very little. I think that was Capablanca's problem. Things were so clear to him, he thought they were obvious to everyone and that there was no need to explain anything.

But he did do at least one very good set of notes, see F Alexander vs G A Thomas, 1919.

Mar-06-16  amaurobius: <AnalyzeThis> Reference your post of Jan-29-11, the book you are thinking of is Hans Kmoch's Rubinstein's Chess Masterpieces (Game 46).
Apr-13-17  Howard: Is anyone here aware that the ending to this remarkable game is very thoroughly analyzed in Nunn's book on Lasker's games?

You might want to take a look at it---personally, I've not had much time to do so, but I intend to!

Apr-13-17  morfishine: <Howard> The road to pure Nirvana and happy Karma is paved with solid bricks of well thought-out intentions

*****

Apr-03-18  offramp: The earlier posts of <visayanbraindoctor> seem incomprehensible nowadays owing to the absence of + and - signs, e.g.

<<44. Qb4> ( 1.68)

<First three engine preferences>: <44. Qc3> ( 0.78); <44. Rb2> ( 0.79); <44. Rc1> ( 0.89) White’s move crosses the 1.40 threshold into a lost game for White and is therefore classified as a blunder.>

Many of these evaluations should be preceded by a minus sign.

Without them the computer analysis becomes garbage.

Feb-16-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  manselton: Some of Stockfish-8 assessments are revised by Stockfish-10. Position after 47.Ra4


click for larger view

SF10 still gives 47...Kd7 as best move but 47...c4 is still just about winning! Black remains winning until the blunder on move 54...Qc5?? Position after 54.Kg2 (! Shereshevsky side-stepping the check on e5 so renewing the threat of 55.Qa6.)


click for larger view

But SF10 now says 54...c3! introducing the resource of ...Qe4+ is still winning e.g. 55.Qa7+ Rb7 56.Qe3 Rb6 57.Ra7+? Kb8


click for larger view

or 55.Re8 Kb6 56.Qa8 Kc5


click for larger view

Feb-16-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  manselton: After 47.Ra4 Kd7 (Instead of 47...c4 as played by Lasker)


click for larger view

SF10 also gives an interesting line. 48.Qa1 Rxe4 49.Ra8 (If 49.Ra7+ Ke6 50.Rxg7 Rf4 Black looks safe and winning to me.) 49...Re2 50.Qa4+ Kc7 51.Ra7+ Kb6 Unbelievable! The King escapes to d5 by running toward the White heavy pieces. 52.Qa5+ Kc6 53.Rxg7 Kd5


click for larger view

Oct-21-20  saintdufus: <PizzatheHut: Could someone help here? The note after move 49 reads "Drawish position".>

I was about to say "there's no note after move 49," but then I read the comments and realized there must have been some weird bogus annotation thing going on, which Chessgames.com eventually corrected over the years.

Dec-22-20  ColdSong: The main thing in this game is Lasker's choice to expose his king Imo.Interesting Idea...for strong computers.A mere human,even Lasker,risks instant disaster endlessly playing this way.And that's actually what happened.
Jan-07-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: 57. Qxf6+ wins equally well: 57...Kc8 58. Qe6+ Kd8 59. Qd7# or 57...Ke8 58. Qf7+ Kd8 59. Qd7#.
Jan-07-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Beatles themed puns? Hmm...I think we've seen <Day Tripper> here. Perhaps a Ringo themed pun is called for?
Jan-07-22  RookFile: <A mere human,even Lasker,risks instant disaster>

As Kirk said in Star Trek, risk is part of the game if you want to sit in the captain's chair. Computer says that with 54.....c3 Lasker is clearly better and it's white fighting to stay alive.

Jan-07-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: This has always constituted one of the hardest games for me to understand. Of course, today we have the silicon monsters to do all of the work for us, but in the pre-computer era it amazed me that White, with only Q & R, could penetrate a defense that included Q, R, 2 pawns, and the King itself.
Jan-07-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  igiene: As far I know, " Day Tripper" is a song written by Paul & John, not by Ringo. Maybe " Whit a little help by my pieces".
Jan-07-22  goodevans: <An Englishman: [...] Of course, today we have the silicon monsters to do all of the work for us...>

A lot of the work but not all. Computers are always seeking the objectively best moves rather than the ones that give the best practical chances.

In this game Lasker, having cocked up on move 54 and finding himself in a sorry predicament, had the chance of making a bit of a fist of it next move with <55...c3>.


click for larger view

This allows White the opportunity to win Black's Q with <56.Rc8+> but after <56...Kd7 57.Rxc5 Rxc5> the R supporting the P's advance gives excellent drawing chances.

Of course Schlechter would probably have realised that and continued <56.Ra7+> as in the game but even then having the c-pawn one square nearer promotion would have given him a bit more to think about.

It's the fact that computers don't pick up on these practical considerations that makes it worth us humans continuing to exercise our own intellects.

Jan-07-22  nevetsjy: Whoever comes up with these 'puns', doesn't know what a pun is.
Jan-07-22  nevetsjy: Capablanca is a near pointless annotator.
Jan-07-22  Petrosianic: They know what a pun is, they just don't know what a rhyme is.
Jan-07-22  nevetsjy: Haha, you couldn't be more wrong. At least 'Helter' and 'Schlechter' rhyme, 'Schlecht' sounds nothing like 'Skelt' on the other hand.
Jan-08-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  Willber G: <al wazir: 57. Qxf6+ wins equally well>

57...gxQ

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Schlechter, Carl (1874-1918)
from 1st Class Masters by PMKnight
Game 57
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by AdrianP
Get back to bed, Barbara.
from Ground is shaking. Everything is burning. by offramp
Game 57
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by nakul1964
getting a feel for the openings (C)
by fourier
54...Qc5?
from Emanuel Lasker blunders by azaris
65.The Queen and Play with the Heavy Pieces
from Modern Chess Strategy I by Ludek Pachman by Retarf
4-Ruy Lopez
by classicalwin2
Annotated Games
by Morphischer
The Greatest Ever Chess Endgames
by K9Empress
Pachman's Modern Chess Strategy
by maoam
Carl Schlechter !!!!
from One has to have at least two plans .... by arielbekarov
Game #93
from John Nunn's Chess Course copy by ChessMessKnight
The Queen: Play, with the heavy pieces
from Modern Chess Strategy by BlueMooner
blunders2
by painho
Game 57
from Garry Kasparov on My Great Predecessors Part 1 by MetalPlastic
memorable moments from the world chess champs.
by kibitzwc
TOP-WORLD-CHAMPION-SHIP-MATCHES
by saveyougod
54...Qc5
from World Championships Blunders by amadeus
schlechter
by MandersSonOfCranders
plus 112 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC