chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Wilhelm Steinitz vs Emanuel Lasker
Lasker - Steinitz World Championship Rematch (1896), Moscow RUE, rd 5, Nov-21
Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation (D50)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 45 more Steinitz/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you missed a Game of the Day, you can review the last year of games at our Game of the Day Archive.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
May-07-05  aw1988: A dangerous game. See how many people would stumble here.
May-07-05  aw1988: Hmm. Yes he could have.
May-07-05  aw1988: Why did you delete your post? White does indeed mate by the line you gave.
May-07-05  gladiator367: Steinitz missed 40. Qf6+ Kg8 41. Re1-e8#!!! how could he miss that and call it a draw?
May-07-05  azaris: Of course Lasker played 35...Qxd4 and not 35...Rxd4??. The score as given is "not even wrong".
May-07-05  gladiator367: Sorry i reposted it in this post above,it is actually a quicker kill for white..
Jan-05-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: This is another of the 1896 match's hand-to-hand fighting games, where once again the veteran ex-champion instigates complications.

<17.g4> is very sharp, but unfortunately for Steinitz has a tactical flaw. The rather surprising <17.Ne4> is quite playable, and if 17...Qxc2, then 18.Nxf6+ Nxf6 =

Instead of 17...Nxc3, <17...Bxd4> would have given Lasker a significant advantage, e.g. 18.Nxd5 Qxc2 19.Bxc2 Bxb2

Steinitz could have held his own with <27.Nxf5+!>. This takes advantage of the discovered attack on <f5> by his bishop, 27...Kf8 (the reason being if 27...Qxf5?? 28.Qb4+ wins the Queen outright) 28.Qb4+ Kf7 29.Nd6+ Bxd6 30.Qxd6 Re8 31.Ba4=

Steinitz is frustratingly close, but never quite close enough to a win, e.g. <28.Qxe6+!?> Kf8 29.Nxf5 Rh7 30.Rd7 Bc8 31.Ne7 Qxe7 (or 31...Bxd7 32.Ng6+ Kg7 33.Qxd7+) 32.Rxe7 Bxe6 33.Rxh7 Bd6 with a Bishop for two pawns and all the prospects.

<40. Qf6+> would simply lose the Queen.

Mar-01-08  Knight13: <gladiator367: Steinitz missed 40. Qf6+ Kg8 41. Re1-e8#!!! how could he miss that and call it a draw?> 40. Qf6+ Qxf6 and Steinitz might as well flip over the table.
Sep-16-10  soothsayer8: What an exciting game, you don't see these sorts of draws very often, both players clearly going for the win.
Jun-14-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <Chessical> <Steinitz is frustratingly close, but never quite close enough to a win>

Actually, Nunn gives two missed wins for Steinitz in <John Nunn's Chess Course>


click for larger view

Here 27.Nxf5 is stronger than 27.Rxb7+, and it wins. After 27...Kf6 (best defense) Nunn writes <now the most convincing win is by the attractive 28.Rd5!> Quite a difficult move to see before playing 27.Nxf5, and also after.

Against 27.Rxb7+, Lasker should have most definitely played 27...Kf6 instead of taking the rook. Why let white attack with a recapture with check, when getting the king out of the way now can gain black a tempo? Nunn writes: <The key point here is that by refusing the sacrificed rook Black gains a tempo for his own counterplay and makes it harder for White to break down the pawn-chain defending the black king.> Of course, Nunn gives the lines in the book.

After 28...Kf6:


click for larger view

29.Nxe6, Steinitz move, is strong, but with 29.Nxf5 <white could have won more simply> (This is really not a missed win, as White is still winning.) Nunn gives <29...Rae8 (after 29...exf5 30.Qc6+ Kf7 31.Bb3+ Kf8 32.Rd7 White mates quickly) 30.Rd7 Rhf8 31.Nd4 with overwhelming threats; one line is 31...Qh5 32.Rh7 Rf7 33.Rxh5 Rxb7 34.Rxh2 winning material.

The other missed win is in the next move. After 29...Qg8:


click for larger view

30.Nd4. Nunn writes <With this move, White finally throws the win away. It looks wrong to block the d-file, and concrete analysis shows that White could have won by 30.Nf4! Bxf4 (30...Qc4+ 31.Bd3 Qf7 32.Qa6+ Kg5 33.Bc4 and White wins easily) 31.Bb3 Rh1+ 32.Ke2 (32. Qxh1 Qxb3 33.Qc6+! also wins but it is more complicated) and Black must surrender his queen.>

About that <White wins easily> in the line in parenthesis, I was a bit puzzled, and had to ask the computer what happens if 33...Qe8:

[Analysis diagram]


click for larger view

Can you see it?

Well... what happens is 34.Rd7!

Overall, an insanely tactical middle game. And of course, Nunn analyzed with the benefit of a computer. Too bad that Steinitz missed the win. This was the fifth game of that match and he had lost the first four. It would have been nice for his morale.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 5, Lasker leads 4-0 (4 1/2-1/2)
from 1896-1897 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
Match Steinitz!
by docjan
Game #79
from John Nunn's Chess Course by Incremental
Steinitz manages to draw---just barely
from World Champions A-Z part 2 Lasker by kevin86
(19) Battles Royal of the Chessboard by R.N. Coles
from Battles Royal of the Chessboard by R.N. Coles by Sally Simpson
BATTLES OF THE CHESSBOARD
by zaman216
18
from Epic Battles of the Chessboard by R.N. Coles by trh6upsz
Game #79
from Lasker JNCC by chestofgold
18
from Epic Battles of the Chessboard by R.N. Coles by keypusher
Game #79
from John Nunn's Chess Course copy by ChessMessKnight
Match Lasker!
by amadeus
Fightingest games
by ughaibu
instructive draws
by lonchaney
Match Lasker!
by docjan
18) Epic Battles of the Chessboard by R.N. Coles
from Epic Battles of the CB by R.N. Coles - keypusher by trh6upsz
Game #79
from John Nunn's Chess Course by vantheanh
Game #79
from JNCC Games by pqmatagi
Match Steinitz!
by amadeus
instructive draws by Ionchaney
by Octavia

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC