Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Wilfried Schiller vs Peter Leisebein
SchGambit II/60 (1988)
Italian Game: Two Knights Defense. Traxler Counterattack Knight sac line (C57)  ·  0-1



Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 84 more games of P Leisebein
sac: 5...Bxf2+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-02-05  trogdor: What should black play after 10.Qe1!!! ?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: <troqdor> 10...Qd4+, I suppose. I have no recollection of this game, not sure that I am the one playing White. The opening was not in my repertoire since I left elementary school, certainly not in the 80s!
Mar-14-05  sneaky pete: White is Wilfried Schiller, a German correspondence player. This game stems from the gambit theme tournaments organized by Leisebein and Schneider in the 1980ies.
Mar-14-05  azaris: I wonder why they were forced to play 6. ♔xf2?!. Was it arranged by Andras Adorjan to prove that BLACK is OK?
Mar-14-05  aw1988: The debate of accepting the bishop sacrifice (after the rook sacrifice!) has stretched ages, and I believe it still escapes a definite conclusion.
Mar-17-05  Jaymthegenius: What is the point of 4.Ng5, It neglect's development and whites pawns are still at home, not taking away any support points for the opposing knight, maybe better here for white would be 4.b3,d6 5.Bb2 or 4.d3,d6 5.Be3, or 4.a3,d6 5.b4 but as I said I'm no expert on open games so my analysis might be meaingless.
Mar-17-05  rochade18: <Jaymthegenius> your lines would surprise everyone in a game, but most people prefer 4.d3 or 4.0-0 when avoiding 4.Ng5. Still 4.Ng5 is very playable when you know the best continouations as white.
Mar-18-05  Jaymthegenius: 4.0-0 and white has lost a developing tempo, black will either play ...Bc5 (NOT 4...d5?!5.exd5,Nxd5 6.Bxd5,Qxd5 7.Nc3 and white gains a tempo and aim's to close the position),4...a6 (to prepare to gain space while taking c4 away from the white bishop)

This is just my opinion, though, and 4.0-0 is very playable, but I usually like to wait to castle.

Mar-18-05  InspiredByMorphy: 6.Kf1 and white has the better game.
Mar-22-05  misguidedaggression: <IBM> not really, but he has a better game than he does here. His chance of winning after 6.Kf1 is, according to this database, only 14.9%. A better try against the Traxler is 5.Bxf7+ Though black still has the better game. The 5.Nxf7 lines are more or less suicidal. Notice here how white has only moved 2 pieces in the first 9 moves in an extreemly open game. This opening was designed to take advantage of the white knight needing 4 tempii to go from g1 to h8. Even though White can hang on a little longer by declining the second sacrifice, his position is very underdeveloped and unpleasent.
Apr-23-06  midknightblue: <misguided> Yes 5. Bxf7+ is preferred, but very few people believe that this leaves Black with the better game. Most feel White has won a pawn with no significant compensation. I have read up on this quite a bit - but it was over a year ago. I recenlty lost with 5. Bxf7+ online not too long ago, in a blitz game. At tournament or slow control games, the traxler is not a popular choice as black because you must play very very well to deal with the Bxf7 lines and get any good play. Having said all that, you may or may not be correct about how black stands after Bxf7+. I am just saying that your view is contrary to most of what I have read (online mostly, but also in a book i have by jan pinski).
Apr-16-07  BadTemper: dont believe everything you read
Premium Chessgames Member
  fm avari viraf: All said & done, it seems the whole variation looks drawish but White must avoid the temptations in grabbing the dead pieces.
Sep-17-07  gambitfan: A superb Traxler Counter Attack...
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <12.Bf7+?> is the decisive mistake here. Much better <is 12.Qe4!>

click for larger view

attacking Qh4 and threating Qxe5+.
<12...Qg5+> (12...Nxc2 13.Nf7 white has enough material and gives Ra1 back for development) <13.Qg2 Qf6 14.Qf2>

click for larger view

and it's quite ∞. At least not a quick loss for White

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
6.Kxf2 Nxe4+ 7.Kg1 Qh4 8.g3 Nxg3 this is the common continuatio
from Wandering Tour through the Traxler Counterattack by tak traxler
Another Traxler Counterattack Knight sac line
from Favorite games by KFitzgerald
6.Kxf2 Nxe4+ 7.Kg1 Qh4 8.g3 Nxg3 this is the common continuatio
from Wandering Tour through the Traxler Counterattack by Cannon Fodder
Black - Two knights: King takes, Kg1
by gaborn
5. Nxf7
from two knights for black by rollerblader
from 98_C57_Traxler Counter Gambit by whiteshark
5. Nxf7
from two knights for black by rollerblader1324
2 Kights def/ f.7 attacked/ Schiller mated
from BoondockSaint's favorite games by BoondockSaint
5. Nxf7
from two knights for black by sayatosken
Wilkes Barre Gambit
from evertoexcel's favorite games by evertoexcel
fm avari viraf's favorite games
by fm avari viraf
king takes Bishop, .....Ng6+, King retreat to Kg8
from takchess italian's Traxler Counter Attack after by takchess italian
Opi's Two knights =Fegatello, Lolli, Traxler, P
by Nephrons1
6.Kxf2 Nxe4+ 7.Kg1 Qh4 8.g3 Nxg3 this is the common continuatio
from Wandering Tour through the Traxler Counterattack by takchess
two knights
by zentovic
12.Bf7+? is the decisive mistake here. Much better is 12.Qe4!
from More Nkights Two Cea by fredthebear
6.Kxf2 Nxe4+ 7.Kg1 Qh4 8.g3 Nxg3 this is the common continuatio
from Wandering Tour through the Traxler Counterattack by Southernrun
6.Kxf2 Nxe4+ 7.Kg1 Qh4 8.g3 Nxg3 this is the common continuatio
from Wandering Tour through the Traxler Counterattack by Retarf
5. Nxf7
from two knights for black Compiled by rollerblader13 by fredthebear
plus 0 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC