chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Napoleon Bonaparte vs The Turk (Automaton)
"Napoleon Torn Apart" (game of the day Feb-09-2008)
Schoenbrunn Palace Exhibition (1809)
King Pawn Game: Napoleon Attack (C20)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [21907 more games annotated by Stockfish]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 8 more games of The Turk
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-19-10  Lil Swine: its a relief he didnt try to conquer turkey as revenge
Aug-19-10  Lokaz: What an embarassing defeat for the once fierce millitary strategist.
Nov-25-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Wow. Napoleon was slowly being torn apart.
Nov-25-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: A better pun might have been "Blown apart".
Apr-25-12  ScottWeatherill: 11... Nf3+ looks like a quick finish here
Apr-25-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  andrewjsacks: It certainly is, Scott, and the game goes to show that chess aptitude and savvy military skills are not necessarily both possessed by the same person.
Apr-25-12  Mudphudder: Dude...Napoleon sucks at chess! LOL
Jun-05-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: I have video annotated this game here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRpP...

Nov-22-12  bengalcat47: After getting trounced by the Turk Napoleon must have decided that it would be a bad idea to try and invade the Turkish Ottoman Empire.
Nov-22-12  wildrookie: Napoleon was a great general and a great patzer!
Aug-05-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: what di you call a Frenchman who dives unto a granade?

Napeleon Blownaparte.

Aug-06-13  GumboGambit: <During this game, the Turk was operated by Johann Allgaier>

What ??????

Next thing youll say is that theres no Santa Claus!

Aug-09-13  Nina Myers: "Du sublime au ridicule il n'y a qu'un pas."

Napoleon

Nov-28-13  Eduardo Bermudez: Napoleon's chess style was not polished
Jul-10-14  Ke2: Lol so the classic "Scholars Attack" is actually Napoleon's? His strength in the other 2 games on CG seems higher than this terrible game (and refusal to resign). And this game is much more likely to be real than those 2.
Mar-31-15  siegbert: playing on after losing ones queen is still seen a lot today especially with internet chess!
May-29-15  siegbert: Yes 11 Nf3 does terminate the game there and then. If white takes queen comes out check and mate. If not the queen is gone for a knight.
Apr-09-20  belmanoir: I've read that there isn't really any contemporary evidence for this game; the Automaton definitely met Napoleon and objected to his cheating in their first game, but the second game appears in the tale much later and may have been fabricated. If anyone's interested I can dig up my source...
Apr-29-20  jnpope: The earliest source for this game appears to be the Illustrated London News, 1844.11.30, p352. Staunton acknowledges receiving the game from W. S. Kenny (author of Practical Chess Grammar, 1817) the week prior. As Kenny was a contemporary of Johann Allgaier perhaps he acquired the game directly from "The Turk"?

Also, the game in the ILN ends at 19.Ke2 and indicates Black gave mate in four moves, so it probably ended: 19...Qg2+ 20.Kd1 Nf2+ 21.Ke1 Qxh1+ 22.K-either Qd1#. The position after 19.Ke2 is a mate in 6, assuming best play by White, which is what appears to be tacked on here.
Apr-29-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Staunton didn't take over at the <ILN> until February 1845. Neither Harding or Townsend are able to positively identify his predecessor - described in November 1844 as a 'distinguised member of the London Chess Club,' but Harding cites Whyld as speculating it might have been George Walker. The handover doesn't seem to have been amicable.
Apr-29-20  jnpope: Good catch. Looks like I was off by four months on attributing the column to Staunton. That's what I get for starring at the British Miscellany and CPC for far too long... :-P
Apr-30-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: It's easy to become confused in the mists of early chess history. In his <British Chess Literature to 1914>, p.198, Harding notes a two month break in the publication of the <CPC> at the end of 1842, claiming that Staunton was busy in Paris with his match against Saint-Amant. But, of course, the match took place at the end of 1843.

Harding's chapter on Staunton in his earlier <Eminent Victorian Chess Players> made no such blunder.

May-06-20  jnpope: <MissScarlett: ... but Harding cites Whyld as speculating it might have been George Walker. The handover doesn't seem to have been amicable.>

Walker seems like a longshot as he appears to be critical of that column being in need of improvement in an answer to a correspondent asking if he knew "who does the Chess in the Illustrated London News" (Bell's Life in London, 1843.10.15, p2).

I just happened to stumble across that tonight.
May-07-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Harding, again from <BCL> on the <ILN>: <The first anonymous columns ran in volumes 1-3 from 25 June 1842 to 30 December 1843 but with missing weeks and a two-month break before 15 October 1842. There were only occasional articles in 1844 until a new column began on 16 November, but Staunton's editorship commenced on 22 February 1845....>

It's conceivable then that whoever ran the column until the end of 1843 wasn't responsible when it kicked off again in November. But I agree it would be curious if Walker was running both important columns simultaneously. Perhaps it was just a throwaway suggestion by Whyld based on little more than the acrimony between Walker and Staunton.

Sep-16-20  TheBish: Ironically, Napoleon was "blown apart" in a miniature.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 6)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
1.P-K4 Napoleon Attack (C20) 0-1 Don't try for Scholar's Mate
from Yo' F'eddabaer's Fust Ches Opinens 1-2-3 by fredthebear
1.P-K4 Napoleon Attack (C20) 0-1 Don't try for Scholar's Mate
from yFredthebear's Knights Add Spice III by fredthebear
Napoleon versuses the Turk
from Vagrantlike's fun games collection by vagrantlike
sectiklerim..
by ahmetsahan
Part 3 of BEST GAMES EVER
by dull2vivid
007chess' favorite games
by 007chess
1.P-K4 Napoleon Attack (C20) 0-1 Don't try for Scholar's Mate
from Pins Ins and Outs, ECO C 20s, 40s, 50s, 60s-90s by rbaglini
Keeping the focus on the enemy king works for Black. Develop!
from Games for My Chess Kids by nasmichael
Random
by halfblue
Trapped
from dac314's favorite games by dac314
nightgaunts Komps
by nightgaunts
napoleon´ trouble
from ninja007's favorite games by ninja007
Chessman1's favorite games 1
by Chessman1
Celebrities games
by Vischer
The TURK
from lemgelo's favorite games by lemgelo
greatdane's favorite games
by greatdane
11...Nxh3+!
from Knight Forks by patzer2
The Turk
from Chess has something magic .... by arielbekarov

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC