chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Joost Berkvens vs Victor Mikhalevski
Hoogeveen Essent Open (2000), Hoogeveen NED, rd 5, Oct-17
Spanish Game: Berlin Defense (C65)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1,374 more games of Mikhalevski
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-21-10  RandomVisitor: White has nothing good...


click for larger view

Rybka 3:

<[-1.25] d=23 13.a4> Ba6 14.Ng4 Bd3 15.Nxf6+ Qxf6 16.Qb3 Qa6 17.e5 Rxe5 18.Rxe5 Bxe5 19.Nf3 Bc4 20.Qc2 Bg7 21.Be3 Bd5 22.Rd1 c6 23.Bd4 Re8

[-1.39] d=23 13.Ng4 Nxg4 14.Qxg4 Qd3 15.Qg3 Qxg3 16.hxg3 Bc6 17.g4 Rad8 18.f3 f5 19.gxf5 gxf5 20.a4 Bxb2 21.Bxb2 Rxd2 22.Bc1 Rc2 23.Be3 fxe4 24.Bxa7 Ra8 25.Bf2 exf3 26.gxf3 Kf7 27.Rec1 Rxa4

Jul-21-10  njchess: When I first looked at this puzzle, I thought it was Black to move since White's pieces are so poorly developed for an attack.

After making sure it was indeed White's move, Nxf7 seemed like the obvious choice, followed by Qb3+ winning the bishop. Then, I saw that Black could play Qd5, and, because White's king pawn is pinned by the threat of a backrank mate, Black's queen cannot be captured except by the White's queen. Therefore, White loses a knight for a pawn and his position is even worse.

13. Nef3 followed by (in no particular order) b3, e5, Bb2, Qc2 consolidates White's position. The problem is that Black has plenty of counterplay while this is going on. Black has the bishop pair and a more open position (i.e. tempo), but White has the central pawn and a half open c-file. Slight advantage to Black.

Seeing as it's a puzzle, I'll bet White plays the Nxf7 foray. If so, only two questions remain, 1) does Black find Qd5?, and if so, 2) when does White resign?

Time to check.

Jul-21-10  awfulhangover: Loooooooool! Good one!

Reminded me of http://www.facepalm.org/

Jul-21-10  vangogh228: I saw the trap, so I thought "play the Q first, and congratulated myself on being so clever. Just hung the Knight. As my granddaughter would say... "Duuurrrrrrr...."
Jul-21-10  C4gambit: Lesson 01: If it seems too easy for a Wednesday, it is a spoiler-day.

Lesson 02: Never look down on a defense, no matter how crazy it looks. (Like the queen being fed to a pawn!)

Jul-21-10  MaczynskiPratten: Nice spoiler, caught me completely. I wasn't very happy with Nxf7 anyway because even after Kxf7 Qb3+ Kf8 Qxb5, Black seemed to have compensation for the pawn with White's weak e pawn and Knight on d2 blocking things up. However I didn't like White's initial position anyway and this seemed to give him some compensation.

But of course I missed Qd5 - it looks so unnatural putting the Queen where a pawn can take it. Normally pattern recognition helps chessplayers, but here it has claimed numerous victims!

I'm sure <Once> should have some humorous story to tell about this debacle - the knight in shining armour falling off his horse?

Jul-21-10  zanshin: Well, I got the first three half-moves right ;-)
Jul-21-10  amaurobius: I'm with the 90%.

How are you supposed to spot 14...Qd5? Those of you who saw it - how and why did it occur to you?

Jul-21-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  benveniste: I dodged the trap (this time), but I still couldn't figure out how to avoid the loss of a pawn from this position.
Jul-21-10  CHESSTTCAMPS: In this early middlegame position, white appears to have taken excessive liberties in the opening. He has N+B for 2Bs and is two moves behind in development, both advantages to black in this very open position. Yet the loose Bb5 gives white a chance to grab a pawn and expose black's king, albeit with complications:

13.Nxf7 appears to be white's best chance. 13.Qb3? Rxe5 14.Nf3 Rh5 or Qe8 should win handily for black. Grabbing the knight does not appear to be the best option for black:

A) 13... Kxf7 14.Qb3+ Kf8 15.Qxb5 gives up the bishop pair and leaves the black king exposed.

For black, I prefer an active continuation that keeps the bishop pair:

B) 13... Qd3! (to draw the R from the undefended back rank) 14.Re3 Qd7 15.Qb3 Kf8 16.Nf3 (e5 Nd5 looks strong for black) Ba6 17.N7g5 h6 18.Nh3 Ng4 and black looks better.

Of one thing I'm confident - I'd lose either side of this position to Rybka. Let's see what happened and what the other pundits have to say. Did black walk into a Philidor's Legacy?

Jul-21-10  CHESSTTCAMPS: <agb2002: I need a coffee...>

Well, two cups wasn't enough for me! I missed the quick refutation of 13.Nxf7. A great spoiler to catch a number of us off guard!

Jul-21-10  Waitaka: This is very hard to spot, not only because of 13.Nxf7 Kxf7 14.Qb3+ Qd5 15.exd5 Rxe1+ is not mate yet!! 16.Nf1 Rxf1#

I discarded 13.Nxf7 Kxf7 14.Qb3+ not because I did find 14... Qd5, but just because It was only an exchange (B+P x N), that would not put white in advantage, so I gave up the puzzle.

So I can't take the credit for not falling on the trap.

Jul-21-10  Patriot: I fell right into this as well. 14...Qd5 looks like a useless interposition but not given the weak back rank (15.exd5 Rxe1+ 16.Nf1 Rxf1#).

The one thing that really bothers me about this is, "Would I fall for this OTB?" It is very possible! The problem is tricky, but what's trickier is how to avoid this in the future.

Whenever I miss a key move in a puzzle or actual game, the first thing I try to answer is, "Why did I miss it?" Answering questions like this is important feedback in improving one's thought process. Part of the problem may be that this is a puzzle and we expect a solution, but there may be a more serious side which suggests there is a flaw in our thought process or at the very least--a hole in our logic.

The problem is directly related to the mental process of candidate move selection. Qd5 did not even pop up on the radar screen for me, so it could be that I'm not considering every interposition. For some of you, it could be that d5 did not look safe so you dismissed Qd5 before you could even examine the follow-up. Or it could be that since it's a puzzle and a solution is expected to be there, you considered it "solved"-- after all, there couldn't be anything else so Nxf7 must be the solution!

There is another possible reason for missing this. The "solution" matched a given pattern we've seen too often before and without doing a "sanity check", we assume the pattern works. Puzzles seem to condition us into thinking the pattern always works, but it takes spoilers like this to wake us up occasionally.

Whatever the reason may be, if you want to improve, you must figure out why you missed the key move and become aware of the problem so it can be corrected. Otherwise you will be stuck repeating the same mistake.

To those that saw through the solution, congrats!

Jul-21-10  randomsac: I guess it was good that I failed to see any solution and gave up. As it turns out the spoiler didn't get me, but neither did I realize it until afterword.
Jul-21-10  FrogC: Spoilers are good because they counteract the basic artificiality of chess puzzles. In a real game you don't look at most positions with 100% certainty that you'll find a brilliant winning move if you just search hard enough. Most of the time that move isn't there, and sometimes when you think you've found something you're horribly wrong. Spoilers help train us for that possibility. CG always did state upfront that some (very few) of their puzzles work in this way - I say "did" because I can no longer find where it says this, or indeed anything about the daily puzzle. Have the instructions disappeared from the site, or have I just forgotten where to look? Anyway, I missed this, like most people, despite the advantage, which I wouldn't get in a real game, of a sneaking feeling that Nxf7 was too easy for a Wednesday
Jul-21-10  turbo231: i knew something was wrong Nxf7 only wins a pawn but i fell for it anyway couldn't see anything else didn't notice the back breaker i needed some coffee plus i have a headache excellent puzzle
Jul-21-10  patzer2: A future International Master and a good portion of our regulars, including myself, fell into GM Victor Mikalevski's trap after 12...Re8! with 13. Nxf7? Kxf7 14. Qb3+ Qd5! when the e5 pawn is pinned due to the weakened back rank and mate threat 15. Qxd5 Nxd5 16. exd5 Rxe1#.
Jul-21-10  gropek: <Patriot> Hi!

That's a nice way to improve, and I always ask myself why did I miss, too!

In this case, I came to the conclusion that Qd5 could be spotted in two ways. Just to mention, I did spot Qd5, but it passed through my sanity check, because I was rushing up a little bit, and it was late at night(good excuse :D)

The two ways are:

1 - When giving a fork with a check, can a piece block the check and defend the other piece at the same time? If you think like this, Qd5 kind of moves will always appear into your mind. And after seeing that the queen is hanging, you would ask, what happens after that?

2 - And when you ask this, You'd probably notice that there is a back-rank problem, and the pawn that would get his queen is pinned! So you will conclude that the move is not possible, and you would forget about it.

I did spot this two things, but I couldn't match them together very well. Sometimes I was looking at back rank problems after I take the bishop, and sometimes I was thinking at interpositions that could defend the bishop.

Well... 2/3 for me :P

Jul-21-10  CHESSTTCAMPS: <amaurobius: I'm with the 90%.

How are you supposed to spot 14...Qd5? Those of you who saw it - how and why did it occur to you?>

This is a good question - a number of good tacticians who regularly kibitz in this forum (and have correctly solved more complex problems than this) missed this one. Part of the answer is that black is well ahead in development and should have the advantage in any tactics. Therefore a strong player will recognize positional advantage, then will look for (and *should* find) tactics that take advantage of white's back rank weakness that results from the delayed development. The other part of the answer is simply pattern recognition. The best way to get this is to keep working problems that follow a theme, such as back rank mates, in increasing complexity.

Jul-21-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  chrisowen: Choose chump this Nxf7 knight is falling comerade. Damn a spoiler isnt it? Escort queen b3 but black read the lines pop i.e. Qd5 to boot white's folly. Sierra backdrop first rank is weak affording see have locked down abasic rook e1. Black had the foresight of arming that efile knight takes is a present.
Jul-21-10  DarthStapler: I didn't get it
Jul-21-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: I looked at this for about 10 minutes ... way too much time for a Wednesday puzzle!

After discovering the cute trap, 13.NxP/f7?, KxN/f7; 14.Qb3+, Qd5!; I decided that ... A.) I could find nothing really good for White.
B.) This was a Sunday Puzzle, accidentally given today. C.) That I was losing my chess abilities, surely there was some basic tactic that I was missing.

I then looked at the problem, spent a few minutes scratching my head. I guess this is a "spoiler," and how CG gets to have a (little) practical joke on me.

Jul-21-10  Patriot: <gropek>

That is excellent advice, and is both practical and simple. It's a nice way to help reduce this mistake from happening in the future.

Jul-21-10  beenthere240: 12.f4 looks shaky to me, but I don't see any immediate tactical refutation. 12...Qd4+ followed by R(a) d8 seems to strengthen black's grip on the center.
Jul-21-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: Got it right away--and said to myself, "Naw, that can't be right: pick up a pawn, what's the big deal?" Even more mysterious is why Black resigns after that...
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC