chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Darius Zagorskis vs Matthew Sadler
"Blazing Sadler" (game of the day Aug-30-2016)
Elista Olympiad (1998), Elista RUS, rd 7, Oct-05
English Opening: General (A10)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 24 times; par: 54 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 743 more games of Sadler
sac: 15...Nxf2 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Olga is our default viewer, but we offer other choices as well. You can use a different viewer by selecting it from the pulldown menu below and pressing the "Set" button.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-24-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: 15...Nxf2!? is just the beginning of a deep, brilliant and quite accurately conducted attack against White's weakly protected king. However, in a game like this there are just too many possibilities available and White might have been able to find a better defense somewhere. In particular, I wonder if Black has a win against the silicon suggestion of 25.Rc3:


click for larger view

The brilliant winning method used in the game won't work then, and indeed I can't see anything better than perpetual for Black (25...Qxh3+ 26.Kg1 Bf4 is adequately defended by 27.Qxe3! Bh2+ and White escapes with a perpetual again). I'm not mad enough to try and analyse the position after 25...Qxh3+ 26.Kg1 Rxf3?! 27.Bxf3 Qxd2 28.Rxd2 with 2R+B vs. Q+4 passed pawns on kingside:


click for larger view

This, naturally, let me to wonder if Black couldn't have improved earlier, and my first idea was another bishop move, namely 24...Bxd4!.


click for larger view

Now 25.Rc3 is not available (25...Qh1+ 26.Kf2 Rxf3 is a picturesque mate) but the sacrifice can perhaps be accepted: 25.Qxd4 Qxe2+ 26.Kg1 Rxf3 27.Qh4


click for larger view

I felt Black could still win here, but I failed to find it myself. Crafty, however, is a much better analyst than me and its suggestion of 27...f4! seems to be the solution. After 28.Re1 Qd3 Black is winning, as Black threatens ...Rxh3+ and 29.Kh2 Qd2+ 30.Kh1 Rf2 forces White to give up his queen to stop disaster on his second rank. I'm too lazy to put enough human effort in to reach a full conclusion of all the variations present, but it seems to me that 24...Bh6 was the one inaccuracy in Sadler's attack and 24...Bxd4! was required to win. Someone with more energy and better software will probably prove me wrong...

Unless I'm very much mistaken, this crazy game won a brilliancy prize in the Elista Olympiad.

Sep-24-07  Shams: great stuff switch, thanks
Nov-11-08  notyetagm: OH MY GOD! What a *brilliant* attack this is by GM Sadler.

GM Franco in his GAMBIT book "Art of Attacking Chess", page 74:

<In the opinion of the author, this is one of the most beautiful attacking games in chess history, despite the error on move 24. Once we get over the feeling of euphoria inspired by like 21 ... Rxf3+!!, 23 ... Qh2!!, 28 ... Re4!, etc. ...>

May-05-09  whatthefat: Very nice analysis <SwitchingQuylthulg>, thanks!
Jan-18-10  rune ohlsson: Now - 15. h3 is a blunder. With 15. Nd5 White would avoid all problems.

Anyway, 17. g3 Qxh3 18. Nf3 Bh6 19. d5 White can save the game in an unbelievable way

Jun-20-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: This is a really nice attack. The piece sacrifice 15..Nxf2 was probably not that hard to find, probably 21..Rxf3+ also but 28..Re4 is really pretty and my favorite move was 23..Qh2 which was far from obvious.
Nov-12-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Very surprising attack. It seems to come right out of the blue.
Nov-12-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Superb example of the speculative sacrifice. Looking at 25.Rc3,Rxf3+; 26.Rxf3,Bxd2; 27.Rxd2 leaves White with 2R & B vs. Q, and maybe Black has to take the perpetual, if it exists.
Nov-12-13  Moszkowski012273: Sound attack, yet black did blunder into what should of been a draw with 24...Bh6. 24...f4 with the idea of swinging the bishop over to h4 is absolutely crushing.
Nov-12-13  Ponte Garibaldi: "rune ohlsson: Now - 15. h3 is a blunder. With 15. Nd5 White would avoid all problems. Anyway, 17. g3 Qxh3 18. Nf3 Bh6 19. d5 White can save the game in an unbelievable way"

I do not see how this is good for white, maybe you could explain. After 19d5 that Bh6 you propose takes on e3 with + covered by the rook and then Qh1+ , black B takes that Rc1 and either a bishop or a knight with the Q leaving a completely exposed king. What you set up seems to me completely lost for white, please explain.

Nov-12-13  hedgeh0g: <should of>

should have = should've

Nov-12-13  Ratt Boy: <rune ohlsson: 17. g3 Qxh3 18. Nf3 Bh6 19. d5 White can save the game in an unbelievable way>

Yeah, that is unbelievable: 19...♗xe3 20.♔e1, ♕xg3 mates.

Nov-12-13  hellopolgar: 15 ... Nxf2 is not a sound sacrifice per se, but against someone 150 points lower, it is.
Nov-12-13  TheTamale: Super fun game. For a while I didn't think Sadler was going to pull it off.
Nov-12-13  kevin86: It looks like a game Bobby Boucher would play-or some reckless hockey player.
Nov-12-13  Balmo: This reminds of me of Tal's classic game against I think Gurgenidze, although I can't remember what year. It came from a Benoni defence.
Nov-12-13  Balmo: If I'd been White I'd have tried 24. Ke1. However there seems to be an interesting line (which is probably deeply flawed) that goes... 24. Ke1 Bh6! 25. Rd3 (trying to create an escape square) Qg1+ 26. Kd2 Rxe2+! 27. Kxe2 Qg2+ 28. Kd1 Qf1 mate.
Aug-04-16  tigreton: There's a very nice variation. After 24 Rd3, trying to exchange the monster Rook on e3, Black could play 24 ... Bf6! and if 25 Rxe3 Qh1+ 26 Kf2 Bh4#. Great attack by Sadler, I think most of the moves are very difficult to find.
Aug-30-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: A tribute to the late Gene Wilder, who passed away yesterday.
Aug-30-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Pun on "Blazing Saddles." Very nice way to remember the late Gene Wilder.
Aug-30-16  AlicesKnight: Agreed <PB> and <Englishman>. 14....Ng4 produces a dangerous attack almost out of thin air and white fails to prevent the entry of the black R (17.g3: Qxh3; 18.Nf3 threat Rh1 looks a possibility); 28.... Re4 is beautifully calm but deadly.
Aug-30-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Blazing Saddles included a very good chess scene.
Aug-30-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: here's the board, the Waco Kid has been checkmated. I don't think there's a mate on the board. Another warped Hollywood chess scene *sigh*.

<https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.co...>

here's video of the chess scene:

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tr9...>

There's another reference to chess in the movie--a well known line. Anyone know what it is?

Aug-30-16  weary willy: I can't work out the position, but isn't there a bishop on a6 controlling f1, a rook on the second rank and a rook shooting down the e-file?
Aug-30-16  LivBlockade: Olympiad week continues with a tribute to Gene Wilder.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC