chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Jonathan D Sarfati vs Ryan Stevens
"Sarfati's Safari" (game of the day May-19-2008)
Logan City Chess Club champs (2008), Logan City Chess Club, Australia, rd 6, May-09
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Huebner Variation (E41)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Jonathan D Sarfati.      [5 more games annotated by J Sarfati]

explore this opening
find similar games 284 more games of J Sarfati
sac: 23.Nxg7 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
May-15-08  Pianoplayer: After Rg7+!! no matter what black does it's h8=R# or h8 =Q#.
May-19-08  crptone: Not quite, 37.. Kf8 38. h8=R+ Kxg7
May-19-08  Bobsterman3000: I don't see any real defence against 23. Nxg7, aside from better development BEFORE that move.

17... Qa4 ?? removed the last viable KS defender against the obvious pawn storm that was building. Black showed no sense of danger here, despite a totally undeveloped QS rook and light-squared bishop.

Even the very ugly and inelegant 17...g6 probably would have been better.

May-19-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Morten: 17.-, g6. 18. Bxh6 looks pretty terrible for black.
May-19-08  Samagonka: White deserves a big pat on the back for his pawn strategy.
May-19-08  xrt999: 23.Nxg7 is "not exactly calculated" trading the knight for 2 passed pawns. Well put.

In this puzzle from last month, I posted that this was adequate compensation, and that white should continue to play. In the following game white has the same exact material trade, a knight for 2 passed pawns, but resigns.

R Pert vs C Ward, 2005

May-19-08  cyruslaihy: <xrt999>in the game u mentioned, white's passed pawn is not as far advanced, the main point is that black will have a hard time stopping pawns at 6th rank WITH ONLY 2 RANKS TO WORK WITH
May-19-08  sallom89: very nice attack and sac.
May-19-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jimfromprovidence: I think 22g6 would have worked extremely well for black defensively.


click for larger view

It looks like white has no choice but to retreat the knight.

May-19-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: The passed pawns were far too much for black,as the annotator said,to guard with only two ranks open for his defenders.

IMHO,an underpromotion done unnecessarily,is an ego trip. After 37...♔e8 38 h8=♕# is the proper thing to do.} (Of course,37...♔f8 38 h8=♖?? ♔xg7 the underpromotion is just plain stoopid-lol)

May-19-08  xrt999: < cyruslaihy <xrt999>in the game u mentioned, white's passed pawn is not as far advanced>

very perceptive of you; usually when you resign at move 16 you have not had a chance to move your pawns very far.

If Pert had played on for another 20 or 30 moves as Sarfati did maybe he would have been able to advance the pawns a few ranks.

My main point, not to go off on a tangent, is even at move 23, Sarfati calls his own move "not exactly calculated". That's why I was shocked to see everyone calling for Pert's head on a stick, when I thought his position was absolutely playable.

May-19-08  mjk: <Jimfromprovidence> If he wants to be thematic, White could then sac for two different pawns: 22...g6 23.♘xf6 ♘xf6 24.♗xh6 but it looks like slow going after that.
May-19-08  newzild: <Jimfromprovidence>: White can still sac a piece with 23. Bxh6 gh 24. g5, which looks a little stronger than mjk's suggestion.

I don't mean any disrespect to Jonathan, (who once kicked my butt over-the-board in Wellington), but I think this is a fairly straightforward game. The piece-for-two-pawns sac is quite obviously strong, and I'm not sure if this is worthy of GOTD status.

Having said that, it's good to see another Kiwi! (last one was Murray Chandler, a few months ago, I think.)

May-19-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jimfromprovidence: <mjk> <newzild> I played out both of your continuations but I still don't get anywhere as white.

Black has a nice threat here; he wants to play Qa3, threatening Qxc3, seeing Qxa1.

White has to be aware of that vulnerability.

May-31-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: The decision to go in for the true demolition piece sacrifice 23. Nxg7!? = is interesting in that the computers rate 23. Ng3 higher.

However, the complications of the text move are such that it is much easier for White to find attacking moves than it is for a human opponent as Black to carefully defend against the first player's plan of simply pushing the connected passed pawns. Sure enough Black folds under the pressure, missing equalizing opportunities with 25...fxg5 26. hxg5 Kd8 27. Rb1 Kc8 28. g6 = and 26...fxg5 27. hxg5 Kd8 28. Qb2 =.

Black's desperate 30...Bxh6?! is tantamount to resignation, but other Black moves still appears to lose -- just more slowly but no less surely.

Jun-05-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jonathan Sarfati: Maybe 23. ♘g3 was better, but my previous moves were angling for the possibility of the ♘ sac. It seems even from this analysis that it kept a draw in hand at worst.

22... g6 looks wrong, because that is helping White open lines in the area in which he's attacking.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Nxg7 positional sac for 2 passed pawns.
from To Sacrifice in Chess by mmmsplay10
amazing game/nimzo indian
from benjobench's favorite games by benjobench
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Huebner Variation
from GAMES OF THE DAY by gambitfan
Nimzo-Indian Def. Huebner Var (E41) 1-0 Nxg7 leads to g-file +
from yFredthebear's Pawn Trimmers and Mowers by fredthebear
P-Q4 Attax
by fredthebear
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Huebner Variation
from ANNOTATED+ GAMES by Patca63
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 c5 5.Bd3 Nc6 6.Ne2
from Nimzo-Indian, Rubinstein Variation by KingG
23. Nxg7!?= is not a computer favorite but works well here
from Demolition of Pawn Structure: Sac on g7 (g2) by patzer2
Nimzo-Indian
from Queen's pawn games by freeman8201
Extremely Beautiful...(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 7 by kishchess
Rg7+!! won the game
by Pianoplayer
Extremely Beautiful...(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 7 by xajik
f4-f5 against Nimzo-Indian
from Attacking Themes by trh6upsz


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC