Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Nimzo-Indian (E41)
1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 e6 3 Nc3 Bb4 4 e3 c5

Number of games in database: 1223
Years covered: 1931 to 2019
Overall record:
   White wins 30.5%
   Black wins 28.5%
   Draws 41.0%

Popularity graph, by decade

Explore this opening  |  Search for sacrifices in this opening.
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
Svetozar Gligoric  35 games
Jan Hein Donner  30 games
Artur Yusupov  20 games
Jan Timman  19 games
Ulf Andersson  16 games
John van der Wiel  15 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
Bronstein vs Keres, 1955
Kamsky vs Short, 1994
Gligoric vs Keres, 1958
Spassky vs Fischer, 1972
Bareev vs Akopian, 2000
Kamsky vs Karpov, 1996
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 49; games 1-25 of 1,223  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Bogoljubov vs L Hanssen  1-0431931Prague OlympiadE41 Nimzo-Indian
2. Rubinstein vs E Sapira  1-0371931AntwerpE41 Nimzo-Indian
3. Fine vs H Steiner 1-0371932MatchE41 Nimzo-Indian
4. Fine vs H Steiner  1-0431932Western ChampionshipE41 Nimzo-Indian
5. Alatortsev vs V A Vasiliev  1-0341938Trade UnionsE41 Nimzo-Indian
6. S B Gotthilf vs A Budo  ½-½35193811th USSR Championship SemifinalE41 Nimzo-Indian
7. B Tot vs D Avirovic  ½-½731945YUG-chE41 Nimzo-Indian
8. Lilienthal vs M Yudovich Sr.  ½-½211947USSR ChampionshipE41 Nimzo-Indian
9. V Castaldi vs K Plater  ½-½301947Hilversum ZonalE41 Nimzo-Indian
10. G Kramer vs O Ulvestad  1-061194748th US OpenE41 Nimzo-Indian
11. Keres vs C Kottnauer  1-0411947MoscowE41 Nimzo-Indian
12. C Vlagsma vs F Henneberke  0-1611948NED-ch14E41 Nimzo-Indian
13. Koblents vs A Strautmanis  0-1271948Latvian championshipE41 Nimzo-Indian
14. R H Steinmeyer vs O Ulvestad  0-126194849th US OpenE41 Nimzo-Indian
15. G Kramer vs A Mengarini  1-036194849th US OpenE41 Nimzo-Indian
16. Stoltz vs Ragozin  1-0571948Saltsj÷baden InterzonalE41 Nimzo-Indian
17. Kotov vs Furman  ½-½581948USSR ChampionshipE41 Nimzo-Indian
18. D Djaja vs B Simonovic  ½-½311948YUG-ch 4th 1948/49E41 Nimzo-Indian
19. Julio Bolbochan vs Najdorf  0-1611949ARG-ch MatchE41 Nimzo-Indian
20. Sajtar vs H Mueller  1-0391949CSR-AUTE41 Nimzo-Indian
21. M Katetov vs K Galia  1-0421949CSR-AUTE41 Nimzo-Indian
22. Pirc vs D Djaja  1-0371949YUG-ch 4th 1948/49E41 Nimzo-Indian
23. K S Ojanen vs O'Kelly ½-½541949Reti MemorialE41 Nimzo-Indian
24. Furman vs Sokolsky  ½-½251949USSR ChampionshipE41 Nimzo-Indian
25. G Goldberg vs Taimanov  0-1411949USSR ChampionshipE41 Nimzo-Indian
 page 1 of 49; games 1-25 of 1,223  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-27-03  Kenkaku: My favorite system against 4. e3, the Classical, and the Leningrad as black is to meet them with 4...c5. Are there any other proponents of this system on here? It's fairly universal in the Nimzo-Indian, and strong as well.
Oct-27-03  Benjamin Lau: Against 4. e3, ...c5 is very strong, perhaps the strongest move (I think ...b6 is another good candidate). Black can usually equalize with it. Against the classical 4. Qc2, 4... c5?! is considered a little suspect at top levels these days, but has not been refuted and likely never will be. At lower levels, I think that it might be classified as ...c5 rather than c5?!. The point is that it often leaves black with a very difficult to defend backward d pawn, worst of all, it's on an open file (as in the classical Pirc variation 4. Qc2 c5 5. dxc5). ...c5 is a very good move in the Leningrad. Statistics show that it at least equalizes, but more often brings black a slight advantage with best play from both sides.
Oct-27-03  Benjamin Lau: Romanishin, Portisch, Korchnoi, and some others practice the ...c5 classical, though not very frequently.

are some games with ...c5 against the Leningrad.

Oct-28-03  Open Defence: Andras Adorjan had some very interesting ideas against the Ne2 variation after Black plays c5
Jun-14-07  WTHarvey: Here are some traps n zaps in Nimzo-Indian 4.e3 c5 miniatures:
Premium Chessgames Member
  wordfunph: GM Lajos Portisch on Nimzo-Indain Hubner Variation..

<A lot of variations and novelties were actually mine. Take for instance this Nimzo-Indian variation which they call the Hubner variation. I'm always angry about that, because I already played that line in the fifties, from 1952 till the Bled tournament in 1960. But it was forgotten because it wasn't considered very good. Then suddenly a few years later Hubner started to play it and also Fischer and now they call it the Hubner variation. I have all respect for Mr Hubner, but they forgot that it was actually my idea. But I was not such a well-known player at that time.>

take from NIC magazine 1990/3

Nov-11-18  sakredkow: Seems like variations where black responds to 4. Nf3 or 4. e3 (Bronstein var) have fallen out of favor. That's a fairly recent development if I'm not mistaken.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC