R Hale vs Andrew Burns (1868)

Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players ·

Kibitzing

R Hale vs Andrew Burns
Adelaide CC v Melbourne CC Telegraph Match (1868), ?, Sep-24
English Opening: Anglo-Dutch Defense (A10) · 0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening	find similar games	31 more games of A Burns
	PGN: download \| view \| print	Help: general \| java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Aug-08-13		optimal play: Telegraph Match 1868 Adelaide Chess Club v Melbourne Chess Club <<The Chess Match between the Adelaide and Melbourne Clubs will be commenced at 8 o'clock this evening. The game will be played by telegraph, wires having been set apart for the purpose, and every facility offered by the authorities in each colony. The Adelaide men have been allowed the Exchange to play in, and the Melbourne men have a room in the telegraph office made over to them. Duplicate boards will be placed in the Exchange for the benefit of members of the Club and the public, on which the moves made at the boards of the seven players will be repeated. The Melbourne Club will be represented by Messrs. A. Burns, W. Tullidge, L. Ellis, S. W. Sedgefield, P. D. Phillips, A. G. McCombe, and L. Goldsmith; the Adelaide Club by Messrs. R. B. Hale, W. J. Fullarton, J. Mann, W. D. Scott, R. M. Steele, H. T. Thwaites, and H. Charlick. The members of the Club and the public are invited to be present.> - The South Australian Advertiser (Adelaide, SA) issue Monday 21 September 1868> Board 6 – Hale (Adelaide) vs Burns (Melbourne) 0-1 Novelty – 4.♘f3 Next played - Mackenzie vs Chigorin, 1882 <<A match at chess, between the leading players of the Adelaide and Melbourne chess clubs, has been played by telegraph, and extended over three long nights. It resulted in victory for the Melbourne men in five games, for the Adelaide players in one, and one drawn battle.> - The Argus (Melbourne, Vic.) issue Monday 12 October 1868> Board 1 Goldsmith (Melbourne) vs Steele (Adelaide) 0-1 Board 2 Mann (Adelaide) vs Sedgefield (Melbourne) 0-1 Board 3 Tullidge (Melbourne) vs Scott (Adelaide) 1-0 Board 4 Charlick (Adelaide) vs Ellis (Melbourne) 0-1 Board 5 Phillips (Melbourne) vs Fullarton (Adelaide) 1/2-1/2 Board 6 Hale (Adelaide) vs Burns (Melbourne) 0-1 Board 7 McCombe (Melbourne) vs Thwaites (Adelaide) 1-0 Match Result:- Melbourne - 5 ½ Adelaide - 1 ½

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
Nothing in violation of United States law.
No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
No trolling.
The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.