chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Moritz Lewitt vs Horatio Caro
Berlin Championship Match (1905), Berlin GER, rd 4, May-16
Russian Game: Classical Attack (C42)  ·  1/2-1/2

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
1
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
White to move.
ANALYSIS [x]
1/2-1/2

rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 12 more M Lewitt/H Caro games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you register a free account you will be able to create game collections and add games and notes to them. For more information on game collections, see our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-03-14  Karpova: This game was annotated by Tarrasch in the 'Berliner Lokalanceiger'. I won't reproduce all of his comments.

Instead of 7.0-0, Tarrasch suggests <7.h3> and awards 7...Bg4 an <!>. He criticizes 8.b3, because it was most urgent to remove the pin, so that all pieces can move freely. Two possible ways were: 1) Develop the ♗c1 to e3, f4 or g5. Then Nbd2, followed by c3 or c4 and Qc2 or Qc3. 2) 1.Re1 2.Nbd2-f1-g3, followed by 3.h3.

12.a3 looks like an inaccuracy, but Tarrasch just notes that White had already a worse position, which will deteriorate further and further. <12.Be2> looks fine, although Tarrasch notes that it is met with the uncomfortable <12...Bf5>, but then White has 13.Ne3.

15.c3 is not annotated, but looks like a mistake. Now was the time to develop the ♗c1 with 15.Bg5. But Black misses the chance 15.c3 Bf5 16.Qd2 and White has problems developing and a weak queenside ♙-structure. The move was not annoated by Tarrasch, though.

16...Bf5 looks fine, Tarrasch also suggests <16...Qf5> and considers <16...Re7> to be best.

Instead of 18...Rae8, Black had the interesting tactical resource 18...Bh3, which is worth a look.

Black plays 20...Bg4 to provoke 21.f3, weakening the e3-square (Tarrasch).

24...Bg5 is a fine move, but Tarrasch suggests Black to cash in on his advantage immediately by <24...Bxb2 25.Qxb2 Bxd3 26.Nxd3 Nxc4>.

It seems that Black gave away his advantage with 27...Qe4 (not annotated), when perhaps 27...Ne5 was in order. This time it was more urgent to remove the pin, so either 28.Qc3 or 28.Qb2. After the text move, Black retains his advantage.

Although he praises White's defense, Tarrasch notes that Black has a winning endgame after 32.Nxb7. In order to realise his advantage, Black should now set his kingside ♙s in motion. He seems to go astray with 39...e3 (not annotated), when 39...Bd2 looks stronger.

43...Kf7 is a grave mistake. Tarrasch suggests <43...f4> to enable <...Bd7>, but White can make use of it by 44.d6. What about 43...h3 instead (e. g. 44.gxh3 Bxh3+ 45.Ke1 Bg2)?

White gives away his advantage with the premature 46.d7 (not annotated). Since the ♗g4 is vital, he should have been removed: 46.Rxg4 fxg5 47.d7 and Black has to give his ♖ for the d-♙.

Tarrasch says that <56.Kg2> could be ignored, because if Kxh2 then ...f3 and Black wins. I'm not sure that this is really the case, e. g. 56.Kg2 Kc7 (56...Kc6 57.Kxh2 f3 58.Nd4+) 57.Kxh2 f3 58.Nd4 and ♔ and ♘ seem to have the situation under control.

Source: 'Wiener Schachzeitung', January-February 1906, pp. 16-18

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC