chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Ian Nepomniachtchi vs Yangyi Yu
Capablanca Memorial (Elite) (2015), Havana CUB, rd 5, Jun-19
Sicilian Defense: Lasker-Pelikan. Sveshnikov Variation Chelyabinsk Variation (B33)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 15 more Nepomniachtchi/Y Yu games
sac: 30...Nxb3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-19-15  Mating Net: What a barn burner of a game. White had some decent compensation for the Queen, but couldn't force the e pawn through. Well done by Black to hunt down the enemy King.
Jun-20-15  thomastonk: Nepomniachtchi twittered: <That awkward moment, when you lose a +10 position in the spirit of helpmate.>

Well, what did he mean? Possibly 37.e7?. Instead 37.♗xh5 looks completely winning: without Black's h-pawn White can push the e-pawn, and there is no threat of ♕xc4+/♔f5/♕c8+/♔g5/♕g4 mate.

Jun-20-15  fisayo123: Very original idea from Nepo. Normally, you don't castle queenside in the Sveshnikov, but he did anyway and had a substantially winning position until 37.e7??

What's sad is that as is usually the case with Nepo, he had a lot of time on the clock in a complex position, but didn't use it.

Jun-20-15  AzingaBonzer: The position was only really definitively winning for White if he was a computer. It's easy for a human, any human, to blunder in such a complex position.
Jun-20-15  dumbgai: Was Yangyi short on time? Maybe Nepo tried to move fast to exploit his opponent's time trouble but ended up blundering himself. It certainly looks like the type of position that would warrant spending a lot of time thinking.
Jun-20-15  AzingaBonzer: <dumbgai>

Yu's time was lower than Nepomniachtchi's, but it wasn't super low (like, less than 10 minutes). Nepomniachtchi probably just got overconfident in his victory.

Not that I'm complaining, mind you. Yu's 4.5/5 is much cooler to look at than a 3.5/5.

Jun-20-15  AzingaBonzer: Honestly, though, I was kind of surprised at how bad of a situation Yu managed to get himself into before Nepomniachtchi blundered. Everyone's talking about 37. e7??, but what bad moves did Yu make before then? Was it Qa5?

A bit unexpected, given his solid performance in the first four rounds.

Jun-29-15  ex0duz: <AzingaBonzer: Honestly, though, I was kind of surprised at how bad of a situation Yu managed to get himself into before Nepomniachtchi blundered. Everyone's talking about 37. e7??, but what bad moves did Yu make before then? Was it Qa5?

A bit unexpected, given his solid performance in the first four rounds.>

Yeah, 24. Qa5 is the 'bad move' that stands out and most likely where Yu really started to go wrong. But from what i remember, i think 25.Rf7 is also a bad move. So two bad moves in a row.. which lead to basically a losing position(but only if you're a computer.. :P)

30. Nxb3 was also a 'bad' move.

But like i was saying, in these kinds of complex/open positions, i guess it can be forgiven since it turns it into a crazy middle game which forces Nepo to have to decide what to do with his Queen and be very accurate in how he 'wins the won game'(which as we all know is hard to do), and in the end, he picked the wrong continuation and got burnt since he couldn't follow through all the way(with his queen sac) and miscalculated something along the way(for him to play e7).

I guess there was simply just too many 'good moves' from him to choose from that he ended up getting cocky/overconfident and then chose a bad move(e7) which turned a completely winning position into a completely lost one.

So yeah. While 24.Qa5, 25.Rf7 and 30.Nxb3 were 'bad' moves from Yu, in the proper context of the position, i think he was playing wild to force Nepo to go wrong along the way, and go wrong along the way Nepo did with 37.e7 and thus being the last one to blunder, he lost. IMO, moves like Nxb3 was what kept his chances alive and forced Nepo to blunder after. IF he played it safe, he woulda just been grounded down slowly. This way he at least has counterchances, and he took his chances and won.

This is the type of game i like to see. A nice HUMAN game, with both players trying to play aggressive and force the other to miscalculate and blunder.. As opposed to an opponent making one small positional mistake which is then exploited slowly and without letting the other have any counterplay whatsoever. While i can enjoy a game like that too, i much prefer these wild/emotional high stake positions(where one move can = instant loss), and you must keep your calm and calculate, rather than playing on instinct and losing.. like what Nepo did in this game with e7, since he had like 30 mins left still when he played that IIRC. That's just being too cocky/overconfident, he deserved to lose.

Jul-18-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Breunor: According to Soltis' column, 30 e7 wins for white. 24 Qa5 is black's mistake.

He also said black should play 30 Rxb3 31 a x b3 a2 ch 32 Ka1 e4 which wins for black.

Finally, 36 Rd5 37 Kf5, or 37 Bh5 would win for white, but Soltis says like everyone here, these can be hard to find on the board.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC