jessicafischerqueen:
I published this game I found today, but I think there is something wrong with the year/site as listed. I believe we can probably find out the truth of it though.
<Vlastimil Fiala> published it in his <Quarterly for Chess History (Winter 8/2002), p. 496.>
===============
<Doctor Fiala writes>:
"178. UNKNOWN GAME OF H. N. PILLSBURY
We are happy to print the following J. Hilbert's letter with new unknown game of Pillsbury. But we are not sure, if Pillsbury was able to visit Hastings in 1905, this game could be played probably sometime early..."
==================
<Now an excerpt from J. Hilbert's letter follows>:
"Dear Vlastik,
...I don't know if you can use this now, but here is a 'new' Pillsbury game I located. At least, I could not find it in Pope's book on Pillsbury. Please feel free to use it if you need a little something extra to fill out a page. Of course, do not use it if you are aware of it from another source."
================
<Now Doctor Fiala continues>:
"One of sixteen games played by H. N. Pillsbury blindfold against picked members of the Hastings, England Chess Club, being one of only two games lost by Pillsbury."
===============
<Now Doctor Fiala supplies the pgn for the game>:
[Event "Blindfold simul, 16b"]
[Site "Hastings, ENG"]
[Date "1905.??.??"]
[EventDate "?"]
[Round "?"]
[Result "0-1"]
[White "Harry Nelson Pillsbury"]
[Black "William A Hall"]
[Source "St. John Globe, Nov. 17 1905"]
[ECO "B01"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]
[PlyCount "44"]
1. e4 d5 2. exd5 c6 3. dxc6 Nxc6 4. Nf3 e5 5. Bb5 Bd6
6. Qe2 Nge7 7. Nxe5 Bxe5 8. Qxe5 O-O 9. Qh5 Qa5 10. Be2 Nf5
11. O-O g6 12. Qh3 Nfd4 13. Bg4 Bxg4 14. Qxg4 Nxc2 15. b4
Qe5 16. d4 Qxd4 17. Qxd4 N6xd4 18. Bb2 Ne2+ 19. Kh1 Nxa1
20. Bxa1 Rac8 21. Nc3 Nxc3 22. Bxc3 Rxc3 0-1
Pillsbury vs W A Hall, 1905
============
<Doctor Fiala continues>:
"Mr. William Hall, the winner of the foregoing game, is a former resident of Montreal and was a member of the Montreal Chess Club. Some years ago, in a letter to the editor of this column, Mr. Hall, in referring to Mr. Pillsbury, said 'I am glad to hear that he has now recovered his health, and hope for the future he will let blindfold chess alone. It spoils a man for match play, to say nothing of serious risks to his well being otherwise.'"