chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Everett Perry vs Stasch Mlotkowski
Los Angeles Tournament (1918), Los Angeles, CA USA
Queen's Gambit Accepted: General Line (D23)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more E R Perry/S Mlotkowski games
sac: 12.Qa4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you missed a Game of the Day, you can review the last year of games at our Game of the Day Archive.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
May-09-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  NewspaperChessArchiv: This game submission comes from The Philadelphia Inquirer, Chess, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Sunday, February 23, 1919

In the latter part of 1918 Stasch Mlotkowski, a strong Philadelphia player, now residing at Los Angeles, played in two interesting events. In the Los Angeles Tournament he tied with E. R. Perry for first place and in the play-off defeated Perry with a score of two wins, one loss and three drawn games. The following game is one of the contest.

7B--(a) Black could have played B-Q2 Q-N3 or Q-R4ch, but played the text under, the impression that he would get sufficient attack by his next move in reply to PxP to compensate for the break up of the position on the Queen's side.

9W--(b) Well played, in fact, the saving move, as B-N5ch was threatened.

12W--(c) White again chooses the best move. 12. P-K4 BxP; 13. Q-Q2 NxR; 14. Q-K3 looked tempting, but would be answered by NxP with advantage to Black.

15W--(d) White might have played 15. P-B7 QxP; (if Q-R5; R-R2 and, the Knight is still imprisoned); 16. N-N6 Q-Q1; (best) 17. NxR KxB; 18. BxP and now P-N4 could be replied to with Q-N4ch, K-N1; B-Q6.

16B--(e) White threatened Q-N7. The text is to prevent this and give Black's Knight a chance to develop at R3 if White does not continue as in the actual game. P-N4 would have been answered by NxP, PxB; N-R6 dis ch, K-R1: NxB, RxN; Q-N7.

23W--(f) White could have safely continued with P-Q5, as Black could not play R-N7ch, K-N3 and take Pawn either Rook or Bishop. However, the move made is also a good one, as if the Pawn is not taken it will hold Black from making full use of his forces, and if it is White gets a winning end game.

27B--(g) R-K1 should have been played, holding back the King's Pawn. After the text move, Black's game is lost. This seems to indicate White should have played 26. P-K4.

30B--(h) Not a good move on general principles.

32W--(i) P-Q5ch would have won more quickly.

34W--(j) If now P-Q5ch, Black would play BxP and draw.

42W--(k) K-Q6 was somewhat quicker.

42B--(l) B-R6; K-N6; K-B1 would have made it more difficult. White could then win by P-B7, B-Q2; K-B5, B-R5, P-K6; P-K7, B-B2: K-B6, B-K1ch; K-Q5 and bringing the King over to KB8.

https://best-in-chess.blogspot.com/...

Sep-06-25  Stolzenberg: 5. ... Bg4 = H Rossetto vs S Johannessen, 1962

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC