|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Dec-09-04 | | ergin1984: what an amazing game |
|
| Jun-09-05 | | 12929011: where |
|
| Jun-09-05 | | hintza: <ergin1984> Welcome to chessgames.com! :-) <12929011> It's a good point! |
|
Jun-09-05
 | | WannaBe: It is black's sixth move... been thinking about what to do. I must say, I am captivated by this game too. |
|
| Jun-09-05 | | bomb the bishop: Hi everyone, I wonder if any of you can help me. I am in a dilema of what I should play against the sicilian defense, I don't know wether its recomendable to play the main variation and learn all the different lines such as dragon, najdorf, taimanov, etc,, or wether its more simple to learn for example the alapin. I still know that I will have to learn them all, sooner or later, but at the moment I do not have the time, so what should I do? |
|
| Jun-09-05 | | InitiativeCheck: <bombthebishop> Look up the Smith-Morra Gambit if you are not afraid of giving some material away for the initiative. Yes, against strong players you may find yourself getting squeezed but there are plenty of chances to mix things up a bit with this great attack. e4 c5 d4 cxd4 c3!? dxc3 Nxc3 |
|
| Jun-09-05 | | hintza: It really depends on what kind of position you are comfortable with. The Closed Sicilian is a decent option too. |
|
| Jun-09-05 | | bomb the bishop: <hintza> thankyou for responding.. to answer your question:
I like more open positions with the iniciative wether it be with material disadvantage but with compensation, or not.. that is why I do not like the closed sicilian its a little too defensive for my taste, and it gives black an equal game to quickly however, there is a possibility that I am looking at it from a very negative perspective, If I am, then someone correct me, please |
|
| Jun-09-05 | | hintza: The Closed Sicilian usually leads to a slower, more postional game so it probably isn't suited to your style. 2.c3 or the Smith-Morra Gambit are probably your best options. You could also look into the Bb5 systems, for example 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 (Rossolimo Variation) or 2...d6 3.Bb5+ (Canal-Sokolsky Attack / Moscow Variation). |
|
| Jun-09-05 | | bomb the bishop: very well, I will look into both of them, I have used the Canal-Sokolosky Attack in a national tournament and it did make me win the game I played it, so it is a possibility, thanks again |
|
| Jun-09-05 | | hintza: You're most welcome. There is also the Wing Gambit, 2.b4. I've never been sure what to make of that one though. |
|
| Jun-09-05 | | bomb the bishop: <hintza> Keres used it, succesfully against Eliskases in 1937 in a GM tournament however it is quite risky, Keres himself said that his oponent had a better position during most of the game, but he was lucky to find a brilliant combination that terminated the match and gave him a helpful win, it is too much a risk for me though, thanks |
|
| Jul-22-05 | | Robin01: I have always like e5 for black's sixth move here. |
|
| Jul-22-05 | | e4Newman: I've used ...e5 a fair bit myself in this and other similar positions. Sadly, it doesn't always work well for me :( |
|
| Jul-22-05 | | OneBadDog: In Emms Starting Out: The Sicilian, this line only has a 48% success rate for White. |
|
| Jul-22-05 | | hintza: <I have always like e5 for black's sixth move here.> Well 6...e6 transposes into the Scheveningen. |
|
| Jul-22-05 | | jamesmaskell: The Smith-Morra is covered in a fantastic book. Will track it down for you Monday from my local library, from its incredible 4 books! Its easy to learn in its main line but it has a number of variations. Give up a couple of pawns but be ahead in development is the idea behind it. I havent even learnt how to play the Sicilian properly but I know the Smith-Morra. Another alternative is using the Maroczy Bind, but I know nadda about that. |
|
| Jul-22-05 | | hintza: <Maroczy Bind> You can only play that in certain positions though. |
|
| Jul-22-05 | | jamesmaskell: Its an option instead of the Smith Morra. |
|
| Jul-22-05 | | hintza: In what way is the Maroczy Bind system an option instead of 2.d4? |
|
| Aug-02-05 | | waddayaplay: I am convinced this is the most sound respons to the Najdorf. I think some day when the fuzz about the velimirovich attack has gone out, peaople will come back to this opening. The Opocensky variant promises white a solid and safe game without any great risks. I base this on the records of Geller and Karpov, who have never lost a game with it according to this databse. |
|
| Aug-04-05 | | jamesmaskell: This variation has been having a fair amount of play this year. |
|
| Aug-02-06 | | gambitfan: What do you call the Velimirovic attack ?
Is it 6 Be3 ?? |
|
| Aug-02-06 | | MaxxLange: The Velimirovic attack is a system against the classical Sicilian, where Black plays an early ....Nc6. White's setup is Bc4, Be3, Qe2, 0-0-0, and g4, possibly prepared by Rhg1. It's possible for White to play for the same kind of attack against the Najdorf Sicilian, but it's not quite the same thing. 6. Be3 is usually called the English Attack, I think. |
|
| Aug-09-06 | | gambitfan: What do you call the <classical> Sicilian ? |
|
 |
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Kibitzing
