< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 4 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Oct-07-06 | | syracrophy: <Aspirador> I'm not convinced. I think that after 1.Qf5 fxg6 2.Qd7+ Kb8 3.b4 Black's winning or drawing. Ideas or opinions? Anyone? |
|
Oct-08-06 | | Aspirador: <syracrophy> You are very sceptical. 1.Qf5 fxg6 2.Qd7+ Kb8 3.b4 is an easy win for white, Re5 and Nd2 are both in trouble. Did you download the engines I told you about? Check it out, it's a great help for checking studies, syracrophy. |
|
Oct-08-06 | | syracrophy: <Aspirador> I'll maybe download it later |
|
May-06-07 | | blackburne: Genrikh Kasparian
article in spanish:
http://www.ajedrezdeataque.com/03%2... Compositions in:
http://www.ajedrezdeataque.com/03%2... ---
|
|
May-07-07
 | | tpstar: Another neat Kasparian composition:
 click for larger viewWhite to Play and Win |
|
Feb-16-08 | | arsen387: His son is also a chess player (though far from being that succesful) and a was a co-presenter of a popular chess program on one of armenian TV channels 2-3 years ago. |
|
Feb-27-08 | | pawnofdoom: <tpstar> If you ever come by this page again do you mind giving me the solution? I can't find the winning move. |
|
Feb-27-08 | | whiteshark: player of the day
<acirce> His great collection <Domination in 2545 Endgame Studies> is one of my favourite (endgame) books! This worldwide anthology of endgame studies is divided into thematic sections in which white wins by trapping pieces. The studies were selected with a view to presenting a clear picture of the rise and development of different ideas and enabling the reader to appraise the past and present of endgame composition in the sphere of piece-trapping. |
|
Feb-27-08
 | | Phony Benoni: <pawnofdoom> For the solution, check here: Phony Benoni chessforum |
|
Feb-28-08
 | | tpstar: "The diagram is a setting for an endgame composed by G.M. Kasparyan. White is to play and win. This one could very well have come up in actual play." click for larger view"Though White is two pieces ahead, Black threatens 1 ... fxg2# as well as 1 ... e1=Q. It appears that Black's threats are more potent than White's plus in material. On an open board, however, a Bishop may prove to be more powerful than a Queen. Here is how it is done: <1. Bh2+ Kh4> Not 1 ... Kf2 2. gxf3, and Black is helpless since his Pawn at e2, being pinned, cannot move. <2. Rxe2 fxe2 3. Bc7!> Paradoxical; it forces Black to Queen with check. <3 ... e1=Q+> If 3 .. g4 4. Bxa5 wins. <4. Kh2> White has another threat: 5. g3+. Black makes the only move. <5 .. Qf2> Now White's Pawn at g2 is immobilized. <5. Bd6!> Black is in Zugzwang - compelled to move against his will. Otherwise, he might survive. <5 ... Qf4+ 6. g3+ Qxg3+ 7. Bxg3#> The final setting is an elegant example of the triumph of the spiritual over the material, illustrating that a Bishop on the right track is superior to a Queen that is derailed." I.A. Horowitz, "All About Chess" |
|
Mar-06-08 | | arsen387: <tpstar> A fascinating composition!!! Thanks for posting it and it's solution. |
|
Apr-09-08 | | Benzol: Still trying to find <Sneaky>'s elusive puzzle. This might be it. It's an end-game study by Kasparian from 1935 and published in the magazine '64'.  click for larger viewWhite to play and draw
Solution :
1.Qc8+ Ka7
2.Qc7+ Ka6
3.Qxe7 Qg6+
4.Kxh4 Qh6+
5.Kg3 f1=Q
6.Qe2+ Qxe2 stalemate! |
|
May-28-08
 | | Sneaky: <Benzol> That is a beautiful composition, but not it. Let me try to recollect more about the position in my memory. In the one that I saw (published in Chess Life sometime in the 1990's) it starts off with the White king "frozen" and without move. So White, who was obviously losing and desperate for a draw, offering the white Queen and the Black king kept running away from her since any capture would lead to stalemate. But then, the tables turned, and Black was finally able to get out of check by offering the Black queen. Not merely "blocking with the Queen" but offering it, free for the taking. But White couldn't take it--because then White would take the offering with one last check and go on to lose the game. (I forget the details of exactly why and how, but that was the concept). So the unforgettable nature of the position, is that the motif switched from White with the "Crazy Queen" to one where Black had the "Crazy Queen". The only position I've ever seen like that in my life. I actually forget the final outcome with best play. It suppose, based on my description, it must have been "White to play and draw." I have boxes of old Chess Lifes, and sometimes I flip through them looking for the position, but never with any luck. I am almost sure it was Pal Benko's "Endgame Laboratory" column. |
|
May-28-08 | | zooter: Somebody presented me "Domination in 2545 Endgame Studies" -- I'm just an amateur player improving (everyday)...Is this book any good and useful to me? I go to a chess club headed by a reputed international player and when I mentioned this book to him, he said that even after I become a good player, i'll not understand this book :) Is it true? |
|
May-28-08 | | Benzol: <Sneaky> <<Benzol> That is a beautiful composition, but not it.> OK <Sneaky> I'll keep looking. I feel sure one of us will nail it eventually. :) |
|
May-28-08 | | whiteshark: <zooter> I neither know your nor the <reputed international player>, but maybe you like to know something Mark Dvoretzky wrote concerning this matter: " By solving or playing studies, we train our imagination and our ability to decipher the opponent's ideas, as well as the calculation of variations and the rapid taking of decisions by the method of elimination. Some studies expand our understanding of the endgame. ...
In studies there is an absence of positional evaluation. Hence the conclusion: you can and should, by solving studies, train your imagination and calculation. But to develop your positional understanding in this way is not possible. Moreover, even for improvement in tactical, calculating play your should not restrict yourself to studies alone. It is also useful to test your powers in finding 'inexact combinations', with an interlacing of calculation and evaluation, in which chess is so rich." I hope it helps you further! :D |
|
Jun-03-08 | | zooter: <whiteshark>
Thanks! I'll definitely give this book a try after I finish the other chess books in my queue (don't seem to find the time to go through them :) ) |
|
Jun-11-08 | | DarthStapler: Wasn't Kasparov's mother's name originalyl Kasparian? I wonder if they're related |
|
Jul-28-08 | | ravel5184: Since we're talking about puzzles here, see one of my compositions (warning: very easy) <  click for larger view
Black to play and draw (original study - all rights reserved) 1 ... Ra8+
2. Kb3 Ra3+
3. Kxa3 Qa8+
4. Kb3 Qa3+
5. Kxa3 Ra8+
6. Kb3 Ra3+
7. Kxa3 stalemate!!> |
|
Jan-24-11 | | kevins55555: <DarthStapler>
It is not a misprint. A NSWJCL magazine said not a misprint. The game was in 1937 and it said Kasparov wasn't known and also wasn't born! |
|
Jan-25-11 | | arsen387: <CG> He was Armenian, why is it written Georgia under his name? I think the country where he was born is not that much important to write near his name with the dates of his birth and death, but rather the country where he is from, where he also lived, worked and died. |
|
Feb-27-11 | | Benzol: Good to see him as POTD. Still haven't found <Sneaky>'s elusive puzzle as yet. |
|
Feb-27-11
 | | Penguincw: This player's name looks a lot like Kasparov. |
|
Feb-27-11 | | Caissanist: Kasparian was Kasparov's mother's maiden name. When his father died his name was changed to the Russified version of that name. |
|
Feb-27-11
 | | Penguincw: < Caissanist: Kasparian was Kasparov's mother's maiden name. When his father died his name was changed to the Russified version of that name. > Thanks for the info. |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 4 ·
Later Kibitzing> |