< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 37 OF 52 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Jan-04-06 | | trumbull0042: <chesswonders: What is the position number in Fischer Random where the pieces arrange in the regular classical chess position?> #54. Now I understand <Tarigov>'s comment above: <Tariqov: The most deeply analyzed position in FischerRandom is number 54!i always play that position with my friends:)> |
|
Jan-04-06 | | alhemyare: hi
|
|
Jan-05-06 | | Gene M: [1]
Does anyone here own ChessMaster 10000 (that came out new in 2005)? Is it enabled for chess960?[2]
There are several differing systems for assigning numeric id values to each chess960 setup. Fritz9 assigns 359 to the traditional setup, I call it F#359. However, in my judgment (having studied the formulas), the Fritz9 system seems less advantageous than other available systems, and nobody else uses the F# system. Other software assigns 518, or S#518. Chessgames.com assigns it 54. The system I feel is the best assigns it M#362. Computers do not need any id system, all they need is the FEN string like RNBQKBRN. The *purpose* of the id numbers is for easier human conversation. It is easy to answer briefly with "M#813" when your pal asks "What chess960 setup did you play last weekend?" There is much more detail in my soon-to-be-release book "Play Stronger Chess by Examining Chess960: Usable Strategies of Fischer Random Chess Discovered" (see web site below). I had expected the book to be released by early Jan 2006, but there was a delay of another month. Thanks.
Gene Milener
http://www.CastleLong.com/
|
|
Jan-05-06 | | blingice: <Gene M> Before I even saw your comment, I came here to generate a position to manually put in and play on Chessmaster 10th Edition. I haven't seen anything to automatically do it, and after I set up the position, CM became kinda confused, i.e. I had to TELL it to make moves, because it didn't understand what was happening, and also it attempted to play the Sicilian on me, so I'm guessing that Ubisoft hasn't really tried to program it for FischerRandom yet. |
|
Jan-05-06 | | Gene M: BlingIce, That confirms my suspicions. UBI was not saying anything about chess960 one way or the other, which seemed to mean CM10 lacks this ability. Given the long release cycles, CM may become one of the few remaining chess960-ignorant engines before CM11 is ever released. |
|
Jan-06-06 | | chull: In reference to wanting a bigger board and more pieces, check out http://www.gothicchess.com/. Looks a lot like what that reader is suggesting. (They need to redesign that "chancellor" piece though. A piece should be easily identifiable by its head not its base.) |
|
Jan-07-06 | | blingice: CM still beat me with me telling it to move. Ha. |
|
Jan-10-06 | | Endgame: I just visited that gothichess site that <chull> kibitzed just above. It actually seems kind of a good variation of chess. Although personally I would probably never play it, as I still have so much to learn about normal chess. Same thing with FRC... I would probably never take it up as a hobby, because I will never be able to get bored with normal chess. |
|
Jan-10-06 | | terrifictb: Besides this websites "Little Chess Partner," is there anyway to play a match? Or am I missing something? |
|
Jan-10-06
 | | WannaBe: <terrifictb> we really don't play chess on this site. We tend to study games and discuss them more than 'play'. =) |
|
Jan-10-06
 | | WannaBe: <terrictb> You might want to think of this place as a 'gym' instead of the 'boxing ring'. |
|
Jan-11-06 | | terrifictb: Thanks |
|
Jan-12-06 | | trumbull0042: I will voice my opinion on Fischerandom. Fischerandom is for zombies. Orthodox chess is already complicated enough as it is, and I really don't understand the people, especially those who are in no position--none!--to do so, who criticize orthodox chess for being too "mechanical" or too "studied". Those people usually know barely 5%--if that much--of opening theory, and have yet to grasp the complexities of chess. Orthodox chess will die when somebody proves the starting position is won for White, won for Black, or is a theoretical draw, but given the circumstances (the limits of current computing power coupled with the sheer enormousness of chess's game tree), that seems highly unlikely. Very few humans, if any, have the brain power to memorize all the opening variations that exist for orthodox chess, so the argument that says that it has become too predictable, too repetitive, is not very strong. Orthodox chess rewards effort and hard work; Fischerandom rewards zombies. |
|
Jan-13-06 | | supermanprime: Fischerandom is awesome. It rewards those who are tactically gifted and have a mind for strategy just like the real game. It does take out the element of opening book which is one of the main weapons of cheaters at all levels, whether it be online or otb. |
|
Jan-13-06 | | supermanprime: By cheaters I mean especially computer cheaters. |
|
Jan-15-06 | | morphyvsfischer: Best game ever. This blows orthodox chess out of the water. |
|
Jan-16-06 | | morpstau: Very few humans, if any, have the brain power to memorize all the opening variations that exist for orthodox chess, so the argument that says that it has become too predictable, too repetitive, is not very strong. Orthodox chess rewards effort and hard work; Fischerandom rewards zombies.
This is unappropriete. |
|
Jan-17-06 | | Dudley: I think Fischer Random and other chess variants are a lot of fun. Just because players can't memorize all of chess opening theory doesn't mean they don't get bored with regular chess. I guess that makes me a tactically gifted Zombie! (lol) |
|
Jan-17-06 | | Gene M: Chess960 is not more "complicated" than traditional chess1. Chess960 is just more "varied". The opening moves in the Mainz ChessTigers.de chess960 games have some complications, but nothing mind boggling. Is anyone saying chess1 middle games are simpler than chess960 openings? Is anyone saying chess1 openings are simple, even though a million chess1 opening books have been sold that go into extreme details about moves into the early middle game? Chess960 positions arise from logical play, not from chaotic spasms of movement. The resulting chess960 positions are plenty logical, they are just less repetitious and less familiar than chess1 positions. |
|
Jan-17-06 | | LoFarkas: Someone said you can play Fischer Random on gameknot.com... Is that correct? I haven't found this option on the site. Do you have to be a subscriber? |
|
Jan-17-06 | | terrifictb: LoFarkus, I didn't see anything on gameknot.com. However, if you go to the home page on this site, click on Little Chess Partner. It is slightly above Fisherandom. Once in Little Chess Partner, click on Chess Jester. It takes you to ludochess.com. Once in Chess Jester, change game type to "throne of chaos." You do need Java to play this. It is a strong opponent, but it is fun. If you choose "Lethal Amazons, you each get 4 queens. There are about 8 different set ups, and you get to choose the computers level. |
|
Jan-17-06 | | johnnyboy: <terrifictb: LoFarkus, I didn't see anything on gameknot.com. However, if you go to the home page on this site, click on Little Chess Partner. It is slightly above Fisherandom. Once in Little Chess Partner, click on Chess Jester. It takes you to ludochess.com. Once in Chess Jester, change game type to "throne of chaos." You do need Java to play this. It is a strong opponent, but it is fun. If you choose "Lethal Amazons, you each get 4 queens. There are about 8 different set ups, and you get to choose the computers level.> just played a game....it's pretty good |
|
Jan-19-06 | | DeepBlade: starting postition #265 is really cool |
|
Jan-19-06 | | Endgame: #54 is the coolest |
|
Jan-25-06 | | Lucky1: #265 is interesting. Bishops and rooks start in their normal positions and each knight can move to its normal first move position. King's Indian? On the wrong side? |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 37 OF 52 ·
Later Kibitzing> |