chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

Big Pawn
Member since Dec-10-05
no bio
>> Click here to see Big Pawn's game collections.

   Big Pawn has kibitzed 26866 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Aug-05-22 Chessgames - Politics (replies)
 
Big Pawn: < saffuna: <The post did not break one of the 7 Commandments...> You've been breaking the seventh guideline (The use of "sock puppet" accounts to ...create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited) for weeks. But <susan> had ...
 
   Aug-05-22 Susan Freeman chessforum (replies)
 
Big Pawn: This is your FREE SPEECH ZONE? Deleted for not breaking one of the Seven Commandments, but simply because an "admin" didn't like the comment? lols This is ridiculous. How are you going to allow such tyrannical censorship? <George Wallace: <Willber G: <petemcd85: Hello ...
 
   Jul-03-22 Big Pawn chessforum
 
Big Pawn: Back to the Bat Cave...
 
   Jul-02-22 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
Big Pawn: <Get rid of this guy> That's impossible. I'm the diversity this site needs. Life is fair. Life is good.
 
   Apr-21-21 gezafan chessforum (replies)
 
Big Pawn: <Optimal Play>, anytime you want to discuss exactly why Catholicism is heresy, just meet me in the Free Speech Zone, but be prepared to have a high-level debate worthy of an Elite Poster. If you think you can handle it, emotionally.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Free Speech Zone (Non PC)

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 104 OF 237 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-25-18  thegoodanarchist: <tpstar: Beware agenda-driven research of any kind.>

But of course.

Feb-25-18  Big Pawn: Philosophical Thought of the Week:

What is truth?

Pontius Pilate

Feb-26-18  diceman: <Big Pawn:

Philosophical Thought of the Week:

What is truth?>

The thing that happens before politics!

Feb-26-18  diceman: <Big Pawn:

What is truth?>

saffuna's bete noire

Feb-27-18  Big Pawn: <diceman: saffuna's bete noire>

To the <tuna>, the truth is like being in a house of mirrors at the carnival. The lies and truth look exactly the same and he's hopelessly confused. Lost.

Feb-27-18  Big Pawn: CPAC and the Death of Conservatism.

https://youtu.be/lxV8FBuhUnw

One of the most thought provoking short videos I’ve seen lately.

Feb-27-18  thegoodanarchist: <Here's the deal. You don't understand the implications of what you say, so you think I'm misrepresenting your arguments. I'm not. And further, I've gone easy on your with kid gloves with this whole thing because I don't really want to kick you down the stairs like the <tuna>, because I actually think that once you cogitate on what I've said to you, you will come around to changing your mind.

You're hopelessly confused about basic philosophical reasoning and logic, and I can see that 100% clear as day. It's not a matter of disagreeing. Still, even with all this, I have resisted the urge to hammer away at you because, again, I think it's unnecessary.

The way I see it is if you take your pride and get it the hell out of the way, then you'll understand what I'm saying. If you don't, then it's a waste of my time anyway.

Now dont't ell me I'm misrepresenting your arguments, or I'll have to come out guns blazing and push you backwards into the campfire, and I don't want to have to do that.

Don't start with the straw man accusations and such, because I will be forced to jam this stuff down your throat, and you won't like it, and I'm right, I know it, I'm comfortable here and you're in over your head, frankly.

"Mr. McGee, you won't like me when I'm angry...">

I just now read this for the first time.

Holy Cow, you're delusional.

Feb-27-18  thegoodanarchist: <What <jls> is doing is ... a flimsy attempt to arbitrarily change the essences of the words.>

You ought to have retained this in your mind, as a corrective to yourself, when you wrote a response to this:

Big Pawn chessforum (kibitz #2695)

Feb-27-18  Big Pawn: <tga>, the point of all your posts on that topic were to say this: I can't say that it's impossible for a man to "fall away" from God once he is born of God. The justification you give for saying that is that "I am not you, so I can't say what's true if it concerns you" and that's simply false.

Then you say that I can't know "that you can't fall away from God" because I would have to have a *definitive understanding* (why?) of God Things to know that, and that's not true, clear, coherent or justified.

Paul gave advice to married people, but he wasn't married, he wasn't those people, but none the less what he said was right and true. So you don't have to be somebody else to comment rightly and truthfully on something that they are living and you are not.

All things are things of God but that doesn't stop you from thinking you know some truths about the world. Morality, the Good, is a thing of God, and yet you *know* that at least *some* things are good or evil, right or wrong. T

That's the long and short of it.

You can try to drag the conversation off into different directions, but this is at the heart of it and what I said is true.

Feb-27-18  zborris8: <BP: ...yet you *know* that at least *some* things are good or evil, right or wrong> This book should be on your reading list:

https://www.amazon.com/Lord-Flies-P...

Feb-27-18  Big Pawn: <zborris8: <BP: ...yet you *know* that at least *some* things are good or evil, right or wrong> This book should be on your reading list:

https://www.amazon.com/Lord-Flies-P...

I read that in school, about the 6th or 8th grade. It is a great book.

Feb-27-18  zborris8: Have you also read The Sea-Wolf? I think you would like it as well. It pits the moral value systems of Nietzsche vs Schopenhauer - Goodness as a form of selfishness vs Goodness as a form of altruism.

https://www.amazon.com/Lord-Flies-P...

Feb-27-18  Big Pawn: Thank you for that recommendation. It seems to be an interesting book and I will put it on my reading list for this year. Nietzsche and Shopenhauer are two of my favorite philosophers.
Feb-27-18  zborris8: <Big Pawn: Nietzsche and Shopenhauer are two of my favorite philosophers.> Then I think you will really enjoy it, cheers!
Feb-28-18  optimal play: <Big Pawn> Do you believe that under the second amendment any person in the USA, including anyone with a serious psychiatric disorder or violent criminal conviction, should be allowed to purchase as many guns as they like, up to and including an arsenal of military assault rifles, and all the ammunition they can store?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

Feb-28-18  Travis Bickle: The U.S. gun laws should be just like Israel.. No One under 27 can buy an assault rifle unless you served in the military.. But the NRA sells semi automatic weapons to 18 year old gang bangers & punks...

The problem is The NRA has Prez Stooge Trump in their pocket as 'The Donald' was awarded 21 Million $$$$$$$$$$$$ dollars to his Presidential Campaign by the NRA..

Marco Rubia got his cool 3 million as did most GOP Rats.. Also corrupt GOPer Screwheads like Paul Ryan, Ted Cruz Mitchell McConnell got their Share also...

P.S. That's why school children get slaughtered by vicious gunmen & the Las Vegas shooting can happen.. Because these rotten Republicans will sell a rocket launcher to a Chimpanzee as long as he has the cash...

Feb-28-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: NRA sells guns?! Thought only gun-store sells guns.

Is that like NBA sells basketballs and sneakers? I'll have to go to NRA web-site and see what I can buy.

Feb-28-18  Travis Bickle: Idiots like you is why they sell guns Chinaman!!
Feb-28-18  Big Pawn: <Travis: The problem is The NRA has Prez Stooge Trump in their pocket as 'The Donald' was awarded 21 Million $$$$$$$$$$$$ dollars to his Presidential Campaign by the NRA..>

What you overlook is that the NRA gets its support from the American people and has more than 5 million members.

The members of the NRA know that the commie libs want to take our guns away. That is the endgame. We need organizations like the NRA to perpetually counterbalance the commie gun grabbers, or else their mission creep will inch forward.

The NRA never killed anybody, and all the libs are talk about the NRA get no respect because they support Planned Parenthood which kills millions.

Mar-01-18  optimal play: <Travis Bickle: ... That's why school children get slaughtered by vicious gunmen & the Las Vegas shooting can happen.. Because these rotten Republicans will sell a rocket launcher to a Chimpanzee as long as he has the cash.>

Travis, as a former marine who served his country in time of war, and presumably proficient in handling all types of firearms up to and including automatic and semi-automatic rifles, do you consider it appropriate that military style weapons should be easily accessible to the general public as a right under the second amendment?

Also what do you think of President Trump's latest announcement regarding his intention to support legislation for sensible gun laws?

https://www.9news.com.au/world/2018...

Are you pleased to see President Trump standing up to the NRA?

Mar-01-18  Big Pawn: "A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined..." - George Washington, First Annual Address, to both House of Congress, January 8, 1790

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." - Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776

"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery." - Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, January 30, 1787

Mar-01-18  Big Pawn: <"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." - Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776>

But Mr. Jefferson, what about people with psychological problems? What do you say about a society that allows people with what we call psychological problems to have guns? Isn't that dangerous? Shouldn't we take guns away?

<"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery." - Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, January 30, 1787>

But Mr. Jefferson, surely you and the founding fathers meant the right to bear arms was so people could go hunting, right?

<"What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms." - Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787>

But Mr. Jefferson, I'm sure you haven't thought this through! If we ban guns, then it will make our society safer, like Australia. Right?

<"The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." - Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776>

Hold on now Mr. Jefferson! You sound like a gun nut! I guess next you're going to tell me that everyone everywhere should be armed at all times, carrying their guns wherever they go?

<"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed." - Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824>

Mar-01-18  Big Pawn: You're a gun nut, Mr. Jefferson, so I'm not talking to you anymore. You disagree with Oprah, the libs and <optimal play> about guns, so you must not be a real founding father.

Let me speak with Mr. Franklin.

Mr. Franklin, with all the school shootings and other shootings in America, I think it's time we amend the constitution and take away gun rights, you know, for safety's sake. What do you think?

<“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759>

You're a gun nut. Let me talk to someone else. Anyone else.

Americans say such silly things, like they need their guns for protection from invaders that want to (lol) enslave them! Have you ever heard such a thing?

<To disarm the people...[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them." - George Mason, referencing advice given to the British Parliament by Pennsylvania governor Sir William Keith, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adooption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788>

He must have been watching Alex Jones back in 1788. Hey, I just read the constitution and it says the militia has the right to bear arms! Got you! Who is the militia?

<"I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers." - George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788>

Ridiculous! Everyone knows that the constitution gives the military the right to bear arms (?)

Does anyone really think that if Americans are disarmed that "the gov't" is going to "get them"? Come on!

<"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops." - Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787>

Look, you founding fathers are idiots. Our argument nowadays in 2018 is that we <need> amend the gun rights! We <need> to. The children are saying so! Something <must> be done! It <must>! The <time has come> and something <must> be done!

<"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves." - William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons, November 18, 1783>

I'm not buying any of this. I'm a cuck and I want you to be one too! Look, the constitution plainly says the militia. Who is that?

<“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." - Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788>

Where did Americans get the idea that the founding fathers wanted the people armed to the point where they could be equally armed against the gov't forces, the military? Surely they didn't mean that!

<"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun." - Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5, 1778>

Mar-01-18  Big Pawn: Give me ONE GOOD REASON, why the American people need military grade weapons! One good reason! After all, the gov't is something we can always trust and will always protect us, right?

<"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them." - Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, 1833>

Mr. Hamilton, when you founding fathers wrote the constitution, you meant that the people should be able to own one shot muskets, but that we should trust and depend on our army to do the heavy lifting. Therefore, the people were not meant to have weapons that could rival the military, right?

<"[I]f circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist." - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28, January 10, 1788>

The founding fathers wanted all Americans to have guns and considered it their <duty> to not only be armed <at all times> but to be <trained and disciplined> in the use of arms. The main reasons were, aside from self defense, to be able to defeat the American army should a tyrant use it to take liberty from the people.

We all know that we can't stand up to the US army, should the need arise, with toy guns. The spirit of the constitution is that the right to bear arms is mean to give the free people of America the ability to defeat its own army!

The founding fathers make clear that anyone who trades a freedom for some safety deserves neither.

This is what makes America America!

Mar-01-18  Colonel Mortimer: <Big Pawn: Give me ONE GOOD REASON, why the American people need military grade weapons! One good reason! After all, the gov't is something we can always trust and will always protect us, right?>

The US government doesn't need to take away the right of Americans to own guns, Washington effortlessly controls its peoples without a shot being fired.

And the corporate owned media does an outstanding job in making that a reality.

Just go watch the ball game without a care in the world, Washington has got you covered.

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 237)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 104 OF 237 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC