Islam has their women in check. Serious check. They have that going for them. They believe in traditional values and have strong men. I like traditional gender roles and I believe in them.

Liberalism is about sodomy, abortion and divorce. Those are the pillars of liberalism.>

Why so limiting?

Wouldn't something like the "Seven Deadly Sins" be more appropriate?

You noticed that too? There are some Christian writers in the manosphere and even ROK, but lots of non-religious types too.

Another author who has noticed the assault of political correctness on all things American has written about Russian and Chinese advances in hyper-sonic weapons technology:

<Prone to the conceit of exceptionalism, preoccupied with identity politics and gender issues accompanied by accusations that science is racist owing to the high number of white males in the field, U.S. weapon systems are taking a back seat to Russia, and to China with their hypersonic weapons....

Russia, allied with China, now challenges an imperialistic United States with its hundreds of military bases encircling the globe. Shorn of its Soviet socialist republics, this economically small country with its array of hypersonic strategic nuclear weapons developed by bright (white) Russian scientists have eclipsed U.S. military supremacy. >

After this announcement, North Korean
restaurants started serving:

Gun control is a false promise, pushed by cowards and conniving elites: security without responsibility. It is a lie believed by fools and those who blind their eyes to the truth that evil exists in the world, and that good men must be prepared to combat it.>>

<Whites are no longer interested in endless complaints.>

https://altright.com/2018/03/12/the...

Here's a bit of it,

<Like many people of modest cognitive ability, Blacks fail to accurately assess how they are being perceived by others. Their complaints and protests about supposed racial injustice have been constant and increasingly abrasive. Are you sick of it yet?

It’s a kind of amusing paradox that the more they complain, the more they alienate themselves. Hence race relations have gotten worse and worse. It’s a vicious cycle of stupidity and a cringe-worthy lack of self-awareness. What are we going to do about this never-ending and tedious problem?

We have reached a stage where Whites are beginning to view Blacks and their antics with a jaundiced eye. This includes practically all non-liberal White people; they are starting to question the victimology lens with which they have been conditioned to use when viewing Black people. Whites can’t quite put their finger on it, but something in the racial dynamics of 2018 is askew.

Consider the 43 percent of Whites who earnestly and naively voted for Barack Obama in 2008. The tone of Obama’s comments on race controversies were seen by many Whites as unacceptable, and the memory of his divisive rhetoric lingers even in their minds. Ever since the controversies of that era, it appears that both Blacks and Whites have changed their perspectives on race in America; perhaps the only commonality is the belief that race relations have gotten worse!

These controversies involve Louis Gates, the professor who was thought to be robbing his own house (an understandable mistake by the police and neighbors); the Trayvon Martin shooting, the reader will hardly require a recap; and Michael Brown, the “gentle giant.” Obama was so partisan, so racially partisan, in these affairs that White voters felt as though the good faith in which they had put in Obama’s new race-blind America was misplaced and betrayed. Instead, unwittingly, Whites had entered into an era of increased racial polarization, with President Obama quite frankly rooting for the other side.>

I thought I was supposed to sit down and shut up? (according to the nut job from Idaho)

The author's name is Malcolm Jaggers (I will call him "MJ" for short).

Is he being coy with this comment? Or just naive/credulous?

He *might* be right that C-span is inundated with mainlybBlack callers. More likely, C-span is playing favorites by giving disproportionately more air time to Blacks.

It is part of the media plan. MJ actually does note this later:

<Pedro, interrupts him: “You would say that wholesale about all African Americans or just certain ones?” The host did not, however, object to categorical statements about White people made by Black callers throughout the segment ...>

MJ needs to become more cynical!

<The caller responded by noting that C-Span had become very “Afrocentric” with an almost obsessive focus on slavery and racism.>

This is blatantly obvious not just when watching C-span, but with practically everything on TV! The New Millennium is about the media focusing on race/racism/race baiting. Part of the reason I ditched my TV was to avoid exposure to 24/7 hating of white men.

Overall, MJ gets it right to a degree. Not everyone, but many people, are sick and tired of the one sided narrative that Whitey is bad, and Blacks are oppressed.

Anything else is tertiary.>

You can do better than that BP. It's like saying Conservatism is about oppression, racism and violence. Or Christianity is about persecution, torture and self-righteousness.

I find it interesting that the concept of <liberalism> is seemingly so different in the US than in Europe (at least on the continent). Liberalism is in my country seen as politically a right-wing ideology that is emphasizing the inviolable rights of the individual and in the economic field a minimally regulated capitalism. Sure, there is a movement of urban, feminist, environmentalist people, but these will seldom refer to themselves as <liberalists>, unless the matter of free trade is more important to them than these other issues.

It's not like that at all. Christians don't fight for torture and self-righteousness. Conservatives don't fight for violence and oppression (and racism doesn't exist), but liberals fight and fight hard for sodomy, abortion and divorce.

That's what they stick their necks out for. Those are the pillars of their platform. These are there sacred cows. They don't deny these things. Instead, they own it proudly and adorn them with fancy names to try to legitimize them.

Sodomy is called "Gay Rights".

Abortion is called "Reproductive Rights"

It's to prevent violence by the government. It's insurance against tyranny and it's what makes America great.

It's fighting for freedom and liberty, not fighting for violence.

On the other hand, the libs proudly own their platform and do not deny it:

lol lol lol

You yanks lol lol

You have no nation .. just a combo of Mexicans and Chinese with a few natives thrown in ...

You've nothin which aint copied from BLIGHTY or Europe .

Liberalism is, as you implied earlier, above all, liberation from God, where on makes the Self the central focus of one's life. Such a worldview and identity has consequences. The worship of self leaves many ugly casualties in its wake including abortion and divorce.

Liberalism is truly a cult of Self. The killing of the unborn child is the modern version of the child sacrifice practiced by the ancients. The worship of self is the indulgence of pride. In Christian thinking, Satan is The Pride and choosing to identify with one's own pride is to reject God and identify with sin, which is the spirit of evil, or one could say Satan, the Devil and so forth.

Once we make our pride the locus of our identity and God is no longer in the picture, there is nothing better to do than to seek the satisfaction of one's Self. Sex is an extremely powerful way to satisfy the lust of pride, but pride always wants more and corrupts itself, which leads to deviant sex and an addiction to pleasures. A baby can seriously cramp one's ability to feast continually on life's desires, so abortion is used to make room for more pleasure seeking.

Thus abortion is the sacrifice one makes to Self, to the Pride, to Satan.

Same thing for divorce. Divorce is for people who reject their responsibilities in favor of seeking short term gratification of their feelings.

The liberal, who identifies with his pride, with his Self, who worships Self, lives in a world of lusts, wants, pleasures, pains, emotions and feelings. The liberal operates from a position of feelings-first, and the feelings overwhelm them. Feelings of lust, of want, of desire, of passions. The feelings part of their nature becomes their nature, rather then living in God's nature where logic and an awareness of what is right leads the way. A liberal is a prisoner of his emotions and makes his decisions based on feelings first.

Thus, to satisfy one's ever growing lust and desire to quench one's passions, logic, reason and morality take a back seat in decision making to emotions and feelings.

So while one may know, deep inside, the sodomy, abortion and divorce is wrong, such judgments are easily crowded out by the passions, desires and lusts.

Or do you think in fact other issues are being pursued, and divorce and abortion are unfortunate consequences of these?>

As for abortion, I think <the child sacrifice practiced by the ancients> is not the same thing. From a liberal theoretical standpoint, it will be argued that to prohibit abortion is a matter of the state intervening on the bodies of its subjects. This view can obviously be challenged, as an abortion is a decision made on (potential) human's behalf. So I think you are more on the point with: <A baby can seriously cramp one's ability to feast continually on life's desires, so abortion is used to make room for more pleasure seeking>, even if I believe that it in many cases is a difficult decision to make, and not one made for pleasure.

They are two sides of the same coin. The goal of liberalism is to normalize sodomy, abortion and divorce, so that they can pursue their worship of self without the burden of societal stigma. Western culture is based on Christianity, so ultimately liberalism finds itself in direct confrontation with Christianity.

<Child sacrifice>

It is exactly the same. In liberalism, man makes himself his own god. In order to please the god, he needs to sacrifice his children, get them out of the way, so that the pursuit of pleasures can continue unimpeded.

The self becomes the God.

The goal of liberalism is to normalize sodomy, abortion and divorce>

The people getting divorced, and their friends, often rejoice.

They have "Divorce Parties". It's a real thing.