|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 175 OF 237 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Sep-18-20 | | thegoodanarchist: < wtpy: TGA, A quick lookup notes that the conservative estimate is one million dead after the breakup of the Raj.> Ah, Islam! The religion of peace. |
|
| Sep-18-20 | | thegoodanarchist: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg has passed.
I hope Trump nominates someone from the American Center for Law and Justice. |
|
| Sep-18-20 | | thegoodanarchist: <If she could overrule one decision, it would be the 2010 Citizens United decision>. You scoff? Well, it's true according to this news article: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yau...
Yet, she voted in favor of it!
And on her death bed she regretted it???
I will not laud any such person. You need to stand for your beliefs in Life. If you stand for them only on your death bed, it is as if you REPUDIATED your beliefs in Life. |
|
| Sep-18-20 | | thegoodanarchist: < diceman: <thegoodanarchist: <The Palestinian people are small in numbers and in economic activity, so it is easy to dismiss them.>> How would they do with half our military and GDP?> About the same as the High School nerds would do against the Navy SEALs, if the weapons were divided equally between sides. |
|
| Sep-18-20 | | thegoodanarchist: <Not to mention it would make them easy pickens for Russia/China/Iran. > <diceman> Let me ask you this, then: When the Soviet Union broke up, which countries did China and Iran take over? Easy pickens? right? |
|
| Sep-18-20 | | thegoodanarchist: Dang!
I never realized it, until today. AOC has spectacular tits!: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7a...
Just watch the first minute or so.
I still would never vote for her. |
|
| Sep-18-20 | | Tiggler: <tga> What are you raving about? Pol Pot, the Soviet Union, Mao Tse Dung? The topic was America's potential break-up. Admittendly <wtpy> took the topic off track by talking about the breakup of British India. <BP> asked about the downsides of breaking up the USA, so my answer was relevant. <Islam, the religion of peace> was not. |
|
| Sep-18-20 | | wtpy: TGA, Hundreds of thousands of Muslimswere killed as well in what you referred to as a skirmish. |
|
| Sep-18-20 | | Tiggler: <wtpy> What The Python YAML are you talking about? Even worse than <tga> for spouting irrelevant tripe. |
|
| Sep-19-20 | | Big Pawn: Good news! Ruth Bader Ginsburg is no longer an atheist. She is now a true believer. If fact, one could say she's on fire for the Lord. |
|
| Sep-19-20 | | wtpy: Tiggler, I was addressing TGA's remarks made on 9/17. He references the movie Gandhi, and how it depicted people during the partition of the Raj...."streaming to the other side", and then he notes: "unfortunately I think people might have gotten killed in that. But it was a tactical skirmish."
With estimates of over a million dead the violence that erupted was clearly more than a skirmish. |
|
| Sep-19-20 | | thegoodanarchist: < Tiggler: <tga> What are you raving about? Pol Pot, the Soviet Union, Mao Tse Dung? The topic was America's potential break-up. Admittendly <wtpy> took the topic off track by talking about the breakup of British India.> Raving?
So that is what lesser minds call it, when a high-IQ person reasons something out quickly. Thanks, I didn't know that. Let me help you. Here are the steps:
1. You were referring to the Civil War, when Southern states tried to leave the USA union. You were specifically referencing the number of deaths incurred when tyrant Lincoln attacked the Southern states, to force them to stay in the Union that oppressed them economically and (nowadays) culturally. 2. And nowadays the people oppressing liberty-loving Americans are Cultural Marxists. Since the point of breaking up the USA would be for liberty-loving Americans to escape the persecution of Cultural Marxists, the option you were implicitly supporting, namely maintaining the Union, runs the very real risk of liberty-loving Americans falling under the yoke of oppression of Cultural Marxist Leftists. 3. Here is the part that probably tripped you up. Socialists/Communists/Leftists/Marxists are <all> the same in at least one respect: They love to murder people who don't agree with them. I know that this is a hard reality to accept, but a (truly) objective reading of history allows no other conclusion. 4. Once you understand #3, and admit to yourself it is true, you will then understand gun grabbing. You will then understand why citizens of the state of Virginia NEED 2nd amendment sanctuary cities, why their governor, elected by carpet baggers, wants to confiscate guns. Why on earth would he want to confiscate guns from law-abiding citizens? Can you figure this one out on your own? So this step, step 4, is really not about the gun-grabbing itself. It is about the <why> of gun grabbing. What did all the people murdered by Stalin and Pol Pot and Mao have in common? They didn't die fighting against these Commies, they were <murdered> by these Commies... Because they did not have guns to fight. 5. Even if they DID have guns to fight, if they die fighting Commies they are part of the Commie death toll. But at least they would have had a chance to fight. This is the end of the line of steps. The point of #5 is that, when you look at the in-country death tolls of Marxist USSR, Marxist Mainland China, Marxist Cambodia, then the 1860 Civil War death total that you are stuck on can be seen for what is really is, a <pittance> when compared to the death toll of Marxists who take over a country. The 600,000 killed in Civil War would be people who died fighting (many voluntarily) for their beliefs. As tragic as that is, it is far better than 20 million people murdered for not (fervently) agreeing with Marxist lies. Don't forget, boys and girls, I am here for you, if you need help understanding the hard problems. |
|
| Sep-19-20 | | thegoodanarchist: <wtpy: TGA, Hundreds of thousands of Muslimswere killed as well in what you referred to as a skirmish.> I know.
But Hindus don't export terrorism to foreign countries that aren't Hindu. |
|
| Sep-19-20 | | thegoodanarchist: <wtpy: Tiggler, I was addressing TGA's remarks made on 9/17.> He knows. He was just trash talking at me a little bit, and was trying to anticipate what my comeback might be. As you can see, I trash talked back at him, insulting his critical thinking skills a little. It's all in fun, no worries. |
|
| Sep-19-20 | | thegoodanarchist: < Big Pawn: Good news! Ruth Bader Ginsburg is no longer an atheist. She is now a true believer. If fact, one could say she's on fire for the Lord.> LOL!
And Saint Floyd, PBUH, is still drug-free! |
|
Sep-19-20
 | | OhioChessFan: <BP: You were specifically referencing the number of deaths incurred when tyrant Lincoln attacked the Southern states, to force them to stay in the Union that oppressed them economically and (nowadays) culturally.> Coincidentally, I am currently reading "Crisis of the House Divided", by Harry Jaffa. It's a review of the Lincoln-Douglas debates. Lincoln doesn't come off well. One huge point is both Lincoln and Douglas agreed slavery wouldn't be around long, for the practical reason it was becoming economically ineffective. Both abhorred it personally. But Douglas accurately accused Lincoln of being willing to destroy the country and cause untold deaths to be done with it a few decades earlier. Well, the USA chose Lincoln's position. And here we are 160 years later, and those people the USA chose to die for, on moral grounds, are spitting on that history. |
|
| Sep-19-20 | | thegoodanarchist: For the record, when the young boy Kyle Rittenhouse defended himself against violent adult Marxist attackers, he ended up shooting three convicted felons: Joseph Rosenbaum, 36: Served twelve years in prison for a sexual offense against a minor. Anthony Huber, 26: Found guilty of multiple violent offenses, including strangulation Gaige Grosskreutz, 26: Convicted of burglary and weapons charges |
|
| Sep-19-20 | | Tiggler: <tga>: Most of the 5 points in your long reply to me, I agree with. But you were mistaken here: < the option you were implicitly supporting, namely maintaining the Union,>. Actually, I don't give a crap about the Union, and I agree with those who laughed at the absurd idea "Make America Great Again." Did not realize that you and <Big Pawn> also ridicule this slogan. I do agree that Lincoln was obviously a reckless and stubborn zealot, but he had the old-fashioned idea that he was bound by his Oath of Office. Spare us, please. Jefferson Davis was of the same opinion, and he might have been the last Democrat to try to fulfill his campaign promises. |
|
| Sep-20-20 | | optimal play: <Big Pawn: Holy smokes! Did they shut Newt down on FOX NEWS! https://www.mrctv.org/videos/newt-g...
You can't talk about leftist billionaire George Soros on Fox News. Newt sounds like me in this clip, believe it or not, and then gets totally shut down in a bad and awkward way. Never quite seen anything like that before. He then quips about it being "verboten", again sounding like me here. Let the Elite Posters watch this video (maybe it's a minute long or so) and share with the forum what you infer from this.> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Br7...
"Marie Harf is really saying, "We don't need to bring the truth into this conversation."" "Shows that we are not allowed to criticize the one who is actually orchestrating all this BS" "“To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”" "The people on the panel KNEW exactly what he was talking about. That's why they cut him off" "listening to them being horrified that George Soros' name being mentioned is SUPER creepy and weird" "Soros is like Voldemort - he who's name should not be spoken" |
|
| Sep-20-20 | | Big Pawn: < OhioChessFan: <BP: You were specifically referencing the number of deaths incurred when tyrant Lincoln attacked the Southern states, to force them to stay in the Union that oppressed them economically and (nowadays) culturally.>> Someone else said that, not me. |
|
| Sep-20-20 | | thegoodanarchist: < Tiggler:
Actually, I don't give a crap about the Union, and I agree with those who laughed at the absurd idea "Make America Great Again." Did not realize that you and <Big Pawn> also ridicule this slogan.> I don't ridicule the slogan, and I've never seen <BP> ridicule it either. If it were possible to make America great again I would soundly support the idea. But the damage done in the last 60 years cannot be undone at the ballot box, IMO. |
|
| Sep-20-20 | | rabarbaro: It's their preamble to the November results, when Trump gets reelected by a wider margin than he had achieved in 2016. Crazy Lefty(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfv...) Bonus: the hypocrite used the term, "guys," to address her viewers, but lefties think it's hate speech(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moW...) |
|
Sep-20-20
| | OhioChessFan: <tga: But the damage done in the last 60 years cannot be undone at the ballot box, IMO > Covid and Floyd blurred what I thought would be an existential political point: Would American Blacks continue to vote for Democrats in the face of historically good economic news for their race? If they would, I would be resigned to American Blacks and America being on an inexorable road to failure. |
|
| Sep-20-20 | | Big Pawn: < OhioChessFan: <tga: But the damage done in the last 60 years cannot be undone at the ballot box, IMO > Covid and Floyd blurred what I thought would be an existential political point: Would American Blacks continue to vote for Democrats in the face of historically good economic news for their race? If they would, I would be resigned to American Blacks and America being on an inexorable road to failure.> This not only rings true, but it also points to the inherent problem, a fatal-error to put it in operating system terms, with democracy, and I'm not talk about one of those little things that makes democracy "messy" or "imperfect", but a fatal-error. A society will sink to the moral low that is allowed. This has always happened. Democracy makes it possible, over time, for the immoral, the wicked and the fools to set the bar lower and lower, until the nation is ruined, as is happening in America. Next thing you know, the pink pussyhats, the people who want to put men dressed as women in the lady's room, the people that made the Boy Scouts (historically Christian organization) accept the homos, the blacks who don't work, are prone to violence and hate white people - all of them will outnumber the wise, the moral and the righteous people. Thus, democracy will end up with the takers, the leaches in charge, making the rules, and legislating your money into their pockets to boot. Some founding father, I forget who (think it was Washington or Adams) said that a democracy is only fit for a Christian society, and that we do not have anymore, again, because of democracy. |
|
| Sep-20-20 | | Big Pawn: <tga: I don't ridicule the slogan, and I've never seen <BP> ridicule it either. If it were possible to make America great again I would soundly support the idea.> That's what you get when a drunk libtard posts on the internet. <Tiggler> doesn't have to be nice. <Tiggler> doesn't have to be polite on this forum <Tiggler> doesn't have to agree. <Tiggler> can be downright caustic and inflammatory on this forum. <Tiggler> can express himself fully and without limits on this page. That goes for everyone.
But a troll who is trolling and everyone knows it, will be put on the <ignore> list without any warnings. Just gone. No big deal. |
|
 |
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 175 OF 237 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
|
|
|
Kibitzing
