https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxL...

Does anyone follow this stuff?

It sounds like "freedom" but I don't really understand how all these gears mesh.

<It sounds like "freedom">

Especially after 2020's voter fraud/Big Tech censorship.

See this from 2013 on the Rogoff Page >

Does anyone follow this stuff? >

heh heh heh

They talk about feminism and women's rights.

heh

https://youtu.be/oi6i2ACRN7A

Some comments on the youtube thread:

<Sean Connery would go to a feminist rally and leave with his shirt freshly ironed>

<She was lowkey fascinated by him because he doesn't compromise on his ideals>

<This is a masterclass in maintaining a masculine frame>

<This guy was Red Pill bfr Red Pill was ever a thing lmaoo>

Am interested in how the Catholic church justifies the doctrine. If anyone else is interested, here is the link:

<<<A people's capacity to govern itself democratically is thus proportionate to the degree of its understanding of the structure and functioning of the whole social body.>>>>

I don't agree with that. Democracy is doomed to fail eventually. It's like what <carrots and pizza> once said - (paraphrasing) <democracy is a friend of socialism>.

<How To Be a Beta Male>

https://youtu.be/U66D_Oed58M

This is must-see TV for the Elite Posters - for sure.

Are liberals victims after all?

The first thing we need to ask ourselves when considering this question is, "Victims of what?" These beta male libs aren't natural, which is to say that men don't naturally become beta males in the same way that libs do. In every group of men there are always alpha males and beta males, and since there tends to be fewer leaders than followers, we coud say in one sense that there are going to be many more betas than alphas.

But is that really what we're talking about when we refer to the libs at BETAS? Are the libs BETAS just because they number mostly among the followers and not the leaders?

No.

When we talk about the libs being BETA, we mean that they've rejected their manliness and in many cases have taken on something of a spirit of a woman. They think like women, act like women, talk like women and deal with their emotions like women. A beta male is cucked by his wife or girlfriend. He's henpecked.

Now that we've got the definition of beta male out of the way, so that we can use the term and all mean the same thing, let's try to figure out how they got that way.

Let's suppose that in the prior generation or two, bad things happened and that's what caused the BETAS to be so BETA. Are they not victims of society in that sense?

Should we feel bad for the BETA males?

<Bad things happened...>

Bad things like feminism leading to skyrocketing divorce rates, leading to fatherless homes, leading to women bringing up the kids without a man - leading to BETA males.

Two questions:

1. If this is the case, should we feel bad for the BETA males? This would entail feeling pity and sympathy for them.

Do you like seafood cocktail sauce, but don't like all the cheap brands that don't have much (or any) horseradish, or that sweeten with HFCS?

The key is to find a brand of horseradish that is really hot and spicy, the way it should be. We've had a really hard time finding a brand that will knock your socks off, like in the old days when we used to grind it up fresh ourselves.

The hottest horseradish I've found is a recent discover from just last Thanksgiving. It is "Silver Springs" prepared horseradish.

Wow! Super hot!

I had just a few jumbo shrimps to eat, like 3 of them, so I whipped up a little cocktail sized mixture with ketchup and <this> brand of horseradish.

Are liberals victims after all? >

In a way, we are all victims of the "Lost Generation" and "Greatest Generation". For it was the Earl Warren SCOTUS that abolished prayer in public schools, with a 6-1 ruling in the case of Engel v. Vitale.

Here is the wikipedia article about the generations and their naming:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gener...

Of the 9 justices, six were "Lost Generation"-born, and 3 were "Greatest Generation"-born. And one of the "Greatest Generation" group voted against the majority, with two abstaining, evidently.

Don't think too highly of the dissenter, Justice Stewart. He went on to vote in favor of child sacrifice in 1973, siding with the majority in the abominable Roe v. Wade decision. (Roe seems to be a diabolical pun, literally.)

I am very curious to learn the fate of all of the 1962 and 1973 SCOTUS "justices". Thanks to the General Judgement of our Lord Jesus Christ, we will all find out.

The hottest horseradish I've found is a recent discover from just last Thanksgiving. It is "Silver Springs" prepared horseradish. >

<Z truth 000000001: twerps gotta twerp...

But let's note - Georgie was gifted his premium, he didn't pay nothing (unless he was twerping again, ya never know)>

In the <Free Speech Zone>, any topic is up for debate no matter how controversial. Even if <Zanzibar> wanted to come here and defend this:

<al wazir: Pedophilia doesn't always harm the child.>

He would be allowed to do that, because it's a free speech zone.

If <Zanzibar> wanted to defend the morality of child sacrifice, he would be allowed to do that here.

If <Zanzibar> wanted to defend, <White people are inferior to all other races> he would be allowed to, even encourage to, because this is the <FSZ>.

If <Zanzibar> wanted to come here and defend atheism, he would be allowed to do that, because controversial topics is what this is all about.

However, trolling is not allowed in the <Free Speech Zone>. I deleted his comment but did not put him on <Ignore> yet, but I will if he trolls this forum again.

This forum is mainly for the Elite Posters to be able to express themselves, since conservative views were being <cancelled> elsewhere on the site, but it's also for bottomfeeder posters too. Bottomfeeders are allowed to post here, comment on debates, chime in, give their own opinion and talk about anything they want.

However, trolling will not be allowed.

But it wasn't a pure troll - there was some content as to the financials.

(I.e. you claimed to have been gifted 3yrs, which <tga> seemed to have missed.)>