Yeah, Obama was their Golden Calf that they worshiped. He was the perfect liberal. Black, campus oriented, affirmative action, uppity black wife with a chip on her shoulder. It was everything they wanted in a president.>

Don't forget, "liar."
It's almost impossible to be honest, and liberal today.

<Experience? Obama never had a real job in his life but that didn't stop the libs. They said, "He ran a great campaign! That's experience.">

What happened to the old-time, ADULT Democrats we could do business with?>

Liberalism has become too dishonest.

You ever notice the difficulty folks like saffuna/Bartle, Abdel, have standing for things?

They "pretend" what they are.
They imply what they are, but they never definitively state why they support the lies, failure, carnage, they do.

BP asked saffuna a yes/no question and almost brought him to his knees.

This is how "deadly" definitive/declarative, statements are to the left.

I would find it difficult to stand for things, I cant 'actually' stand for.

Low life Liberals just don't have the class to admit when they are wrong, which is practically always

Stop it.

They just never say anything that is forthright, sincere and honest for the American people to judge,so they can never lie!! They're like horoscopes, seriously!! Every statement is slippery, vague and based on the particular audience at hand - i.e. Hillary and her private vs. public positions on every issue.

Trump is "controversial" (LOL) because he puts his mind out there there like a real man, with sincerity and conviction.

Wow! What a fight!

<chancho> I watched this one for the first time ever today and it exceeded my expectations even though I knew that Sanchez and Nelsen were great.

<Bobsterman: Trump is "controversial" (LOL) because he puts his mind out there there like a real man, with sincerity and conviction>

This goes a lot deeper than people think. I bet when I say this stuff on the rogoff page, the libs think I'm just trying to troll them and get them upset. They don't really think I'm serious, but I am.

You can't be a real man and be a liberal. I'm serious when I say that some boys grow up attached to their moms and others with their dads, as it should be. The mommy's boys end up being libs.

Women tend to put their emotions first, second and third, and logic after that. When you do this, you end up making lots of bad choices but your pride makes you defend them. What entails is an endless stream of rationalizing and reasoning in an effort to justify utter contrarianism.

That's why everything they say is a lie. They construct intricate webs of reasoning and rationalizing to justify that which isn't so. That is why all of their talk is BS.

I respect Jesse Jackson more than any of these modern "Obama coalition" liberals - all they do is spend their time arguing who is more oppressed. You can't even sit down at the table with them and say, let's make some things happen, drop the emotion and grandstanding - politics isn't about crying and getting every whiny wish - it's about what you can AGREE to moving forward.

Just like the Magna Carta or the Articles of Confederation !!

At least a small group of older Democrats understand what a "nation" is and they love America and understand that we need cohesion, not questioning every damn institution and finding new ways to feel offended.

These new liberals are psycho, man.

LIBERALS: believe in government action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all. It is the duty of the government to alleviate social ills and to protect civil liberties and individual and human rights. Believe the role of the government should be to guarantee that no one is in need. Liberal policies generally emphasize the need for the government to solve problems.

CONSERVATIVES: believe in personal responsibility, limited government, free markets, individual liberty, traditional American values and a strong national defense. Believe the role of government should be to provide people the freedom necessary to pursue their own goals. Conservative policies generally emphasize empowerment of the individual to solve problems.

The difference is simple: Conservatives believe in taking responsibility. Liberals believe in surrendering taking personal responsibility and letting big government tell them what to do and how to live their lives

I'll take the first option, thank you very much

And by the way, while I am conservative, or as I like to describe myself, a "fiscal conservative", I am not a racist, which those leftists Liberals love to conveniently categorize all conservatives

Just another example of why you just can't trust Liberals (mainly due to their closely associated communistic/socialist leanings) [ie: Democrats]

Read here for more information: https://www.amazon.com/Atlas-Shouts...

Excellent book

No need to even say that. Just <saying> that puts you on the defense from an imaginary thrust. The racism charge is all they have when you won't fall for the lies and BS.

Beware of the muslims.. Attacked you once 16 years ago, you invaded 2 countries and spent over a trillion dollars looking for one man.

Beware of the Mexicans.. Never attacked you but you're gonna build a wall, $3500 for every man woman and child. Won't stop immigration because most people are smarter than T***p and could <easily> walk into America regardless of T***ps racist monument. If I know how to do it so do those nasty hombres!?

Beware of the Chinese.. They're sad. Overrated. Failing ratings. Pathetic. So called clothing is overpriced. No one knows more about Chinese noodles than T***p!?

You're the product of cousins if you believe <anything> the fat mentalist says! Any of you.

I'll repeat the words of Adolf Hitler and see if you can see any comparison to what The Donald is doing now by appealing to the <thickest> people in America...

..."Propaganda has to appeal to the emotions and appeal to the mental level of those of the <lowest> common denominator among the public it is designed to reach" - Adolf Hitler."

So the next time you see someone on social media screaming "MAGA!" you know they ain't too bright.

Your hate, and ignorance, is what makes you liberal.

<who repeats himself over and over>

LOL!

Same old liberal stuff. Misogynist bla bla bla, yellow hair bla bla bla, demented bla bla bla.

He reminds my of one of these 18 year old college girls with purple hair and a ring in her nose that thinks they know everything now that they've taken two months of college courses.

He should be ashamed of himself, as a man, for being such a girly drama queen.

It is shameful!

I've seen how <unf> stalks you and even if you're not responding to him, he just won't leave you alone.

Shameful!

<unf> is a demented, half insane guy that needs help, professional help, and I'm surprised he is still allowed on this site after all the trouble he alone has caused.

Most unmanly.

My choice was simple: As pathetic as both candidates were, I much prefer the bigot over the Communist.

After all, its much easier to thwart and keep the bigot in-check and in-line. However, once a Commie, always a commie: there's just no turning back for those leftist lunatics laughable losers

<morfishine> you will undoubtedly like this short video!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxs...

My choice was simple: As pathetic as both candidates were>

"Both" candidates being "pathetic" was simply to cover pathetic Clinton.

Remember morfishine, this idea of an "ideal" candidate that can solve all problems is a liberal lie.

(wasn't that what Obama was supposed to be?)

"Limited government" also limits your candidate. The people are the engine that makes America work, not government. This "genius/gifted" candidate nonsense, is only there so they can run your schools, they can manage your economy, they can manage healthcare, they can fix poverty, they can fix your air/water. As if a career of lying behind a podium makes you "expert" on everything.

Donald Trump is only restoring the laws Obama voided, building a wall that was already voted on long before he was around. Giving government back to the people, and reducing the size of it.

<After all, its much easier to thwart and keep the bigot in-check>

More lies of the left.
The Obama's, Hillary's, go around with smiles on, answering softball questions, as the media savages and lies about their opponents. The media does everything in its power to take Republicans down, so Hillary/Obama can show up to debates with smiles on. (being fed the questions from a liar media doesn't hurt)

Hillary/Obama are probably 1000 times more bigoted vs Trump. Any idea that doesn't give them wealth/power is off the table.

Ask yourself who was the party of the KKK? (Democrats)

Ask yourself who is the party that tells you the black man cant make it without government?
(Democrats)
(as they lecture you how "equal" he is)

Ask yourself who has been burning cars, breaking storefronts, protesting, rioting, since the election? (Democrats)

Then tell me who the bigots are.

<Bp and bob> agree as well. This shameful and hysterical behavior from the press and leftist jerks (and dumb foreigners) happened here as well when our leftist and corrupted President was deservedly impeached. Funnily enough the " liberal" term in Brazil means a people right wing ( not necessarily religious or much conservative).

The left parties here are rotten , bunch of pseudo socialists who hates US capitalism Israel and transgenic bathrooms. Lol basically pseudo intellectuals students "minorities" artists and pot smokers. But anyway I think is a shame (like Trump or not) people don't allow a democratic elected president to govern with peace. They just don't accept the election results as people here don't accept that the left parties here shot their on legs with corruption and incompetence but wanna blame something else.

I don't agree with lots of stuff he says but I'm loving him annoying the lib press, as I abhor this cancer called political correctness that dominates politics and social media. Just my two cents on Us election.

<Diceman> Nice post which pretty much explains why I'm a proud Republican

1. If God does not exits then objective moral values do not exist.

2. Objective moral values exist.

3. Therefore God exists.

In the 3.5 years I've debated this on the <rogoff> page, most of the liberal atheists have tried to refute the argument by saying that it was logically invalid!

They don't make this argument anymore. None of them.