< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 77 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Apr-25-09 | | Eyal: <with the Dvoretsky Endgame Manual Second Edition there is a problem with the print quality (on the first batch at least). The analysis is written in blue but it is way too light to read comfortably.> I have the second edition and I agree that the light blue print is a bit irritating - though certainly readable... the stuff printed in blue rather than black is what Dvoretsky considers as the most basic and important endgame knowledge to be retained in the memory. Btw, Dvoretsky himself in the introduction to his book highly recommends <Endgame Strategy> by Shereshevsky. |
|
Apr-25-09 | | hoodrobin: I learned a lot from:
Chess Fundamentals (Capablanca);
Chess Middlegame Planning (Romanovsky);
Play (Think) Like a Grandmaster (Kotov);
A good pawns endings book (e.g.: Chéron).
I like vm books of games annotated by the player himself (Alekhine, Botvinnik, Fischer, Kasparov...), but any good commentator can do well. |
|
Apr-25-09 | | MaxxLange: IM Tate, when he lived in my area back in the day, used to tell us that he had studied only 3 chess books to become a Master strength player: Vukovic's "The Art of Attack", Kmoch's "Pawn Power in Chess", and David Levy's "Sacrifices in the Sicilian". That was not exactly true, but there is a good thought behind it, to pick just a couple of high quality books and thoroughly study them |
|
Apr-25-09 | | hms123: <MaxxLange> The first two of those three are among my favorites. I don't know Levy's book, but then I don't play the Sicilian. I need to write up something on Kmoch's book--it was very influential in my chess play. |
|
Apr-25-09 | | hms123: <hoodrobin> I have Romanovsky's books (Chess Middlegame; Chess Combinations) and they are first rate. I even have a collection of the games from the Middlegame Combinations book here: Game Collection: Middlegame Combinations by Peter Romanovsky |
|
Apr-26-09 | | hoodrobin: <hms123> Thanks! Romanowsky's book really opened my mind (as long as it could be opened I mean) ;-) |
|
Apr-26-09 | | blacksburg: <Yeah with the Dvoretsky Endgame Manual Second Edition there is a problem with the print quality (on the first batch at least).> i have this book, and i don't have a problem with the blue text, although they could have chosen a better color. as long as you have good lighting and decent eyesight, it shouldn't be a deal breaker. <Dvoretsky's point is that these little tragicomic dramas actually stick in the mind better, and are thus useful teaching/learning aids.> if you like these tragicomedies, you'll love <Van Perlo's Endgame Tactics>, which is basically a collection of tragicomedies. <Btw, Dvoretsky himself in the introduction to his book highly recommends Endgame Strategy by Shereshevsky.> Shereshevsky's book is very good, but is not a theoretical endgame manual. there's nothing like a Lucena or Philidor position in this book, instead, it's a book on late-middlegame positions with an endgame character, that's the best description i can think of. the positions that shereshevsky covers typically have several pawns remaining on the board, often with 2 or 3 pieces for both sides. if you've heard the phrase <NQE's> - not quite endgames - that's a good description. the topics covered in the book are, for example, things like <suppressing counterplay> and <centralization> and <do not hurry>, and it does not cover things like <keep your rook on the 3rd rank until he advances his pawn to the 4th, then move to the 8th and begin checking.> i like shereshevsky's book very much, but you won't find pure technical endgame information in it. |
|
Apr-26-09 | | Eyal: Yeah, I should have mentioned that Dvoretsky recommends Shereshevsky's book as a complement, rather than a substitute, for his own... Among the more basic endgame books - or at least those that begin with the basics - also worth mentioning is Jeremy Silman's <Silman's Complete Endgame Course (From Beginner to Master)>. I don't have it myself, but I saw it highly praised several times - as in the following very informative review: http://www.chessville.com/reviews/S... |
|
Apr-26-09 | | blacksburg: <Silman's Complete Endgame Course> - from the reviews i've read, you'd think that this is the only endgame book you'll ever need. so i feel compelled to comment. this is a GREAT book for someone that doesn't know anything about the endgame, but if you already know a thing or two, you might want to skip it. first of all, this is physically a very large book, but for some reason, it doesn't seem like it needs to be. or maybe i should put it this way - i can spend several hours on a few pages of Dvoretsky. but the first day that i received Silman's book, i read over half of the book. Dvoretsky has information absolutely PACKED into his book. Silman's book has a lot of white space. Silman covers some VERY elementary stuff - which can be good or bad, depending on your level. if you don't know how to mate with 2 rooks, or if you don't know what opposition means, then this is definitely the book for you. but if you already know a thing or two about the endgame, then half of this book or more might be completely useless to you. Silman also chooses not to cover certain things that he considers to be impractical. for example, mating with bishop and knight is not covered. sure, this might never happen to you, but i think an endgame course that claims to be <complete> should cover it. I tend to think that Silman simplifies things a bit too much. For instance, i would have preferred a more in-depth explanation of the Lucena and Philidor positions, which are very important, but are explained only briefly. The concept of the Philidor is simple enough, but i think that a proper teaching of it should contain many many examples of the intricacies. On the positive side, Silman's prose is very friendly and easy to read. the explanations are clear, and Silman does a good job of highlighting the most important concepts. i don't necessarily think that dividing the material by rating is the best thing since sliced bread, but there is one VERY useful side effect of this - it becomes clear that an understanding of complicated endings is predicated on a full understanding of the simple endings. Silman does a good job of emphasizing this. you gotta walk before you can run. In conclusion, this is a very good book for endgame noobs, but the title is a bit misleading - this is not a <complete> endgame course, it is a very good <introduction> to the endgame. i would certainly recommend this book for a beginner, but if you already know a thing or two, half of the book might be useless. and once the beginner learns a thing or two from this book, he will need to move on to other authors to gain a <complete> understanding of the endgame. |
|
Apr-26-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: But isn't a <complete understanding> of the endgame impossible? I plugged a 7-piece position into the online <Nzhedismtitov Table Base> today and it refused to analyze it!! Do you think it's prejudiced against Patzers??
It told me that that my position "cannot compute- cannot compute- get lost-- cannot compute" etc. I'm a little miffed I can tell you.
Also, I just ordered the <Jermy Silly Man Pajamas> Endgame Book from the store last weekend. DOH! |
|
Apr-26-09 | | Red October: what do the rest think of Pandolfini's End Game course ? one of the few books I have that I have not read |
|
Apr-26-09 | | Eyal: Since Dvoretsky has already been mentioned here several times, I thought it's worth mentioning for those who like his writing, or would like to get a taste of it before embarking on his book-length studies, that he's been publishing for several years now a monthly column/article, <The Instructor>, in <www.chesscafe.com> (a very good site for chess articles in general): http://www.chesscafe.com/archives/a... Ones which I found very interesting, for example, are no.53 (February 2005) - "A Battle of Opposites", which discusses a game from the Tal-Botvinnink 1960 match while comparing analysis published by both players of this game; and no.88 (January 2008) - "Polemic Thinking (2)", which discusses the positives and negatives of Fischerandom chess in the context of the problems created by the recent explosion of information in opening theory. |
|
Apr-26-09 | | chessman95: Chess book forum! Great idea!!!
I'll try to post some reviews of the books I've read recently, but first, I would be interested to know if anyone has ever written a good book on how to play an anti-marshall as white. Thanks! |
|
Apr-26-09
 | | ChessBookForum: <chessman95> Thanks for stopping by. We look forward to seeing some of your reviews. |
|
Apr-26-09 | | notyetagm: <hms123: ... You have great tactical examples in your forum. I hope you will stop by again and make some <<<recomendations on tactics books>>> (or on any other of your favorite chess books).> Weteschnik's "Understanding Chess Tactics" by Quality Chess Books is *stupendous*. |
|
Apr-26-09 | | Woody Wood Pusher: Hey <ChessBookForum> Does anybody have any recommendations on a book which will give a good introduction to the Sicilian (as Black) for somebody who has never played it before? I'm thinking of trying to teach a certain old dog some new tricks... haha
Thanks! |
|
Apr-26-09 | | chessman95: <Does anybody have any recommendations on a book which will give a good introduction to the Sicilian (as Black) for somebody who has never played it before?> It depends what variation you're interested in playing, but I can recommend one book that will greatly help any Sicilian player. I was told that Rogozenko's "Anti-Sicilians A Guide for Black" was very good, so I got it, and it was <fantastic>. I must say that this book is really all anyone needs for how to play against all the possible lines that white may play to avoid what you're trying to get to. I could not put this book down over the past few days, to the point where I actually look forward to playing an anti-sicilian!! (absurd for any Najdorf player) No furthur studying needed here... A peice of advise that I can offer to <Woody Wood Pusher>: the most important thing in the Sicilian is practice. You will never be able to read enough books and do enough studying to actually be prepared to play it for the first time, so I suggest just trying it out for a few games while reading some books. Trust me, you will probably get clobbered in 9 out of 10 of your first Sicilian games if you're anything like me, but practice really is the main factor to mastering the defenses. |
|
Apr-26-09 | | chessman95: Correction: <I can recommend one book that will greatly help any Sicilian player.> Any variation player that is, it's a book for black... the great thing about this book is that it usually offers two or three moves to choose from and describes which types of players will find them the easiest to play (i.e. he will recommend one move for Najdorf players, one for Dragon/Accelerated Dragon players, etc.) I can't compliment this book enough. |
|
Apr-26-09 | | Sicilian Dragon: <WWP>
<Starting Out: The Sicilian> isn't bad, but it's fairly basic. If your going to play the Sicilian, play the Dragon! :-D |
|
Apr-27-09 | | BadKnight: Can anybody recommend me any beginners book on the white side of the french? thanks. |
|
Apr-27-09 | | blacksburg: <what do the rest think of Pandolfini's End Game course ? one of the few books I have that I have not read> i have a special place in my heart for Pandolfini's little book. the first endgame book i bought was Fine's <Basic Chess Endings>. that was not a good choice for a first endgame book, and there's nothing <basic> about it. :) i got pandolfini after becoming frustrated with the massive amount of information in fine's book, and i immediately realized that i should have started with pandolfini. pandolfini's book presents simple endgame concepts in a very accessible manner, one concept and example per page. before silman's book came out, pandolfini's book was the one that i would have recommended for an introduction to the endgame. i should note that there are LOTS of typos in pandolfini's book. but i actually learned a lot from the typos - if something didn't make sense, i was forced to figure out what the correction should be, and i learned a lot in the process. <But isn't a <complete understanding> of the endgame impossible?> yeah, you're probably right. but i'm not the one that decided to call it a <complete> endgame course. :) it's really a very good book, but i suspect that after reading it, most will want to expand their knowledge beyond the basics that Silman cover. <Can anybody recommend me any beginners book on the white side of the french? thanks.> i think you're going to find that most books on a specific defense focus on the black side. if you want to learn how to play against the french, your best bet is probably going to be one of those <Winning With 1.e4> type books. but i don't have any of them, so i can't recommend a specific book. |
|
Apr-27-09 | | hms123: <BadKnight> I like <Dangerous Weapons: The French--Dazzle your opponents> by John Watson. As usual, the book is very well-written and carefuly done. There are lots of diagrams and it is easy to follow. The lines have a lot of explanation. |
|
Apr-27-09 | | chessman95: <If your going to play the Sicilian, play the Dragon!> It's interesting, but in Yasser Seirawan's beginner's "Winning Chess Openings" I recall him recommending the Scheveningen Variation for those who are first trying out the Sicilian... not that I agree or anything, but then again, he's the Grandmaster not me. |
|
Apr-27-09 | | Woody Wood Pusher: Thanks for the advice <SD> and <chessman>! |
|
Apr-27-09 | | BadKnight: Thanks <hms123>.:) I will have a look at it. |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 77 ·
Later Kibitzing> |