< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 256 OF 963 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Oct-19-07
 | | Domdaniel: <Benzol> No, it was on 'Tadpoles'. But I don't consider a Tadpole to be a state of mind, despite the affinity with Frogspawn. |
|
Oct-19-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <Esteemed Tr<<<eye>>>angle:> Hurricane Carter was tried twice for the triple murder in Paterson, and found guilty twice. Ultimately, a New Jersey Supreme Court judge set aside his second conviction and ordered him freed. He moved to Canada.
He has not officially been pardoned-- therefore he has no legal grounds to sue the State of New Jersey, nor has he tried. He wrote an autobiography claiming he was innocent.
Dylan was convinced of his innocence.
In fact, however, the "historical jury" is still out on whether or not Hurricane "did the deed." The preponderance of criminological studies lean towards the idea that it was likely he actually did the crime. Public opinion, however, influenced by the Dylan song, Carter's autobiography, and most recently, the Denzel Washington film vehicle, is almost uniformly in favor of the idea that Hurricane was innocent. So in terms of "clearing his name"-- well, that is ambiguous, both in a legal and a colloquial sense. I have read scads of websites concerning the evidence, the judicial history, and I've also read his autobiography. I think he's probably guilty.
However, I love the Dylan song.
Strangely, I think Hurricane's guilt or innocence is irrelevant to the quality and even importance of Dylan's composition. Now <Hattie Carroll>: she was beaten to death for sure by her employer, who got off scott free. Regards,
JFQ |
|
Oct-19-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <Dom>: well, yes and no.
<Tadpole> is not a state of mind. However, in Canada, people often say "I'm feeling a tad Polish today." At least they say this in my imagination.
Regards,
JFQ
|
|
Oct-19-07 | | mack: <Dean M. Idol: Uh, when did that McCarthy person ever say anything of note?> 'Chess is a highly structured exercise which may also serve as a mode of perception and a metaphor for life. 'A moire, on its own, is undifferentiated, integrated, and chaotic: it is the observer who plucks it to pieces to find the structures it conceals. ... Our perceptual paranoia, engulfed in a rage to order, transforms caries into cabals, sees chessboards where there is only moire.' - G. McCarthy, The Critical Zone |
|
Oct-19-07
 | | Domdaniel: <Benzol> There you go. I deliberately held back, knowing our resident Hurricane expert would provide the goods. <Jess> Trivia: who was <The Painless Pole>? <mack> Crikey. Didn't anyone tell him that 'moire' has an accent on the 'e'? 'Caries into cabals' was lifted from some literary critic or other. |
|
Oct-19-07
 | | Domdaniel: <mack> From Hans Richter on Duchamp: "He approaches life as he does the chessboard: the gambits fascinate him without leading him to imagine that there is a meaning behind it all which might make it necessary for him to believe in something." - Hans Richter, Dada: Art and Anti-art, 1964
btw -- today's CG quote of the day, from Alex Baburin, is a little embarrassing. He says he could not respect anyone who plays in the same boring style as himself. I, er, crawlingly told Baburin that I aspired to doing exactly that. But anyone who plays Alekhine's Defence and the Queen's Gambit Accepted can't be totally tedious... |
|
Oct-19-07
 | | Domdaniel: <Tournament News> Maybe I can stop the rot at this event... My chess play keeps on getting worse
But I still can produce a quick verse
So, onwards! - here's hopin'
That the Limerick Open
Will add a few cents to my purse. |
|
Oct-19-07 | | Red October: <Limerick Open>
There was a chess player called McCarthy
An Idle Nomad always up past 3
The editor of Frogspawn
Upon whom people would fawn
While he threw his decadent parties
|
|
Oct-19-07
 | | Domdaniel: <Red> Heh. "Fawn"? Do they, really? It's like grovelling, only more doe-eyed? Hmm, yes, that should be fine, carry on... |
|
Oct-19-07
 | | Domdaniel: <Another mystery solved> I'd wondered if Mark Orr and Simon Knott had ever played. They did, back in 1986. Or not. [Event "GLC Masters"]
[Site "London"]
[Date "1986.03.??"]
[Round "4"]
[White "Orr,Mark JL "]
[Black "Knott,Simon JB"]
[Result "1/2"]
[Eco "D76"]
1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.g3 Bg7 4.Bg2 0-0 5.0-0 Nc6 6.d4 d5 7.cxd5 Nxd5 8.Nc3 Nb6
9.e3 Re8 10.Ne1 e5 11.d5 Na5 12.e4 c6 13.Nc2 cxd5 14.Nxd5 Nxd5 15.exd5 Nc4 16.Ne3 Nd6
17.Bd2 Bd7 18.Bb4 Bb5 19.Re1 a5 20.Bxd6 Qxd6 21.Qb3 Ba6 22.Rad1 a4 23.Qc2 Rec8 24.Qd2 Bh6
1/2 |
|
Oct-19-07 | | duchamp64: <Duchamp-Evans> I am authoring Vol. 4 of the Chess Biography of Marcel Duchamp (Moravian Chess), covering his late years 1942-1968. Happy to talk about book and/or Duchamp via email: allansav@aol.com Here is your request
Duchamp, M. – Evans, L.
Endicott, NYSCA Championship, 1948. Round 5.
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 c6 4.e3 Nf6 5.Nc3 Nbd7 6.Bd3 dxc4 7.Bxc4 b5 8.Bd3 a6 9.0-0 c5 10.b3 Bb7 11.Bb2 cxd4 12.Nxd4 Be7 13.Rc1 0-0 14.Be2 Rc8 15.Bf3 Bxf3 16.Qxf3 Ne5 17.Qe2 Qa5 18.Rc2 Ba3 19.Bxa3 Qxa3 20. Nb1 Qd6 21.Rfc1 Rxc2 22. Rxc2 Neg4 23.Nf3? (23.g3 = Evans) Ne4 24.Nc3 Ngxf2 25.Nxe4 Nxe4 26.Nd4 h6 27.Rc7 Qa3 28.Qc2 Nf6 29.Qb1 Nd5 30.Nc2 Qe7 31.Qe1 Qb7 32.Rc5 Qb6 33.b4 Rd8 34.Nd4 e5 35.Nf5 Qf6 36.e4 Nf4 37.Rc3 Qb6 38.Kf1 Kh7 39.g3 Nd3 40.Qe2 Nxb4 41.a3 Nc6 42.Qg4 g6 43.Ne3 Ne7 44.Qf3 Kg7 45.Ng4 Qd6 46.Kg2 h5 47.Nf2 Nc6 48.Nd3 Nd4 49.Qe3 a5 50.Nc5 b4 51.axb4 axb4 52.Rc4 Rc8 [0-1] |
|
Oct-20-07 | | Benzol: <jess> Thanks for the update on Ruben Carter. Now if I could only stop hearing that tune in my head. "They bite, they scratch, they make an awful fuss. It's no use stroking them and saying Puss, Puss, Puss". :) |
|
Oct-20-07
 | | Domdaniel: <duchamp64> Thanks a lot. I've been trying to compile a collection of MD's games, but -- as I'm sure you know -- all the usual sources have large gaps. Thanks for the email add... I'll be in touch. |
|
Oct-20-07
 | | Domdaniel: <Benzol> I suggest a mix of Hurricane + Hunting Tigers... "This is the story of the Hurricane
Who bit and scratched and made an awful fuss
In Paterson New Jersey that's hard to explain
You might get a sock in the puss."
No, wait, that's from <Don't Put the Cat in the Washing Machine, Mother, You might get a sock in the Puss>. Oddly enough, synchronicity fans, I had to chase a stray cat into my attic yesterday and talk it out from the deepest corner it could hide in... |
|
Oct-20-07
 | | Domdaniel: <Duchamp64> Quite an interesting game, actually -- I think Evans used the mini-combination after 23.Nf3? in a book about typical errors... it 'only' loses a pawn, but that proves sufficient for Evans to eventually win the game. One small detail. I assume White's 27th move was actually 27.Rc6 rather than 27.Rc7, which seems excessively dadaist even for MD. Thanks again. I'll be intrigued to see what post-1942 Duchamp games you've got, as all the main databases and biogs fade out in the mid-1930s. The *other* MD -- <mack> -- had suggested I look for your advice. I should have listened to him sooner. Another question: do you think we should add more Duchamp games to the CG database, especially now that google, other search engines, and some Duchamp-related (art) sites direct people here for data on his chess career? The <chessgames.com> selection isn't bad, but it's a very long way from being complete. |
|
Oct-20-07
 | | Domdaniel: <Duchampiana, continued> Reading that fine collection of MD's French letters, <Affectt Marcel._The Selected Correspondence of Marcel Duchamp> by Naumann & Obalk, I get the impression that chess references are deemed worthy of inclusion as long as they occur in a letter that also mentions other topics. And, while I remain fascinated by Duchamp's art, I'm not too concerned about his business with dealers and collectors. There must be other letters to chess cronies -- re correspondence games or his endgame book with Halberstadt -- which were cut from this volume. Maybe somebody should collect and edit Marcel's writings on chess...? |
|
Oct-20-07 | | Red October: isnt it high time that this forum paid tribute to the former unified champion Kramnik ? |
|
Oct-20-07 | | Red October: ok the last post was too liberal ;-D |
|
Oct-20-07
 | | Domdaniel: <Red> Former unified champion Kramnik, our foremost fianchettoist? |
|
Oct-20-07
 | | Domdaniel: We all have acrostic bear, don't we? |
|
Oct-20-07
 | | Domdaniel: ... should have anticipated genuine grosseries in neologisms, Gerry ... <1 grocery = 144 gaucheries> |
|
Oct-20-07 | | mack: <The other MD...>
Michael Douglas?! Oh right- Me, Duh.
Have to say that a collection of Duchamp's chessy French letters is too great an idea not to be pursued. As you said before, there must be loads of old correspondence games lying around somewhere; where are the Duchamp archives, for that matter? |
|
Oct-20-07
 | | Domdaniel: <mack> Scattered to the wild archival winds, it seems ... Smithsonian, NY Public library, Universitaire de Paris, Austin Texas, Philadelphia, Yale ... Francis Naumann, editor of the published letters, has collected over 1000 photocopies from diverse sources, but doesn't indicate whether more chessy ones exist. Like I said, they must do -- unless the art crowd threw 'em out for being insufficiently readymade. Here's another question for you: do you, as composer of chess problems, have full copyright in your compositions? It occurred to me that they should differ from games on that, er, score... |
|
Oct-20-07
 | | Domdaniel: ... and once you've flogged the movie and translation rights to a nice mate in two, those residuals should keep pouring in ... |
|
Oct-20-07
 | | Domdaniel: <Spawn of the Frog>: Nice to reach page 256, btw. Thank you all. It's 100000000 in binary notation, or 100 in hexadecimal. 256 = (2^2)^(2^2) = [(2^2)^2]^2
Next, 257 = (16^2)+1 = [16, 1], which is a prime factor of some interesting larger numbers of the form (2^n)+1. |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 256 OF 963 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
|
|
|