chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

OhioChessFan
Member since Apr-09-05 · Last seen Nov-12-25
______________ Moves Prediction Contest

<Main Focus>: Predicting how many moves in a game for each pairing.

Chessgames.com tournament page:
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...

Official site: http://

Live games:
http://www.nrk.no/sport/sjakk/

Alternative live games: http://worldchess.com/broadcasts/eu...

***Hall of Fame***
chessmoron chessforum

<Format>:

[player]-[player] [result] [# of MOVES]

==4 Different Scoring Methods==

Standard Moves Ranker (1st place-Over[3pts], 1st place-Under [7pts], Exact [10pts])

Bonus Ranker (3rd place-Over[1pts],2nd place-Over[2pts],3rd place-Under [5pts], 2nd place-Under [6pts]

Standard Moves/Bonus Ranker [Add all to together]

1st place Ranker [how many 1st place you have in Standard Moves Ranker]

For example:

<Note: Participants 3, 4, and 5 are predicated on nobody scoring an exact as Participant 2 did. If someone hits an exact, the closest score under and over will score the points for second place.>

Actual Game: [player]-[player] 0-1 45

Participant 1: [player]-[player] 1/2 45
Participant 2: [player]-[player] 0-1 45
Participant 3: [player]-[player] 0-1 44
Participant 4: [player]-[player] 0-1 43
Participant 5: [player]-[player] 0-1 46

Participant 1: No points even though 45 is correct. Results must be correct. If Result is wrong and moves # is correct...you get no points whatsoever

Participant 2: 10 pts rewarded for correct Result/moves #

Participant 3: 7 pts rewarded for closest under (1st-Under) to 45 moves

Participant 4: 6 pts rewarded for the 2nd closest under (2nd-Under) to 45 moves.

Participant 5: 3 pts rewarded closest OVER(1st-OVER) to 45 moves.

Again, the description of Participant 3, 4, and 5 are based on there being no exact prediction as made by Participant 2.

<IF> there is an exact or an under closest, the highest scoring over participant will be 2nd over. The second closest over will be 3rd over. The <ONLY> time there will be a first over is if there is no exact or under winner.

Things To Look At:
1. Game Collection: 1975 World Junior chess championship
2. Ongoing edits Vladimir Ostrogsky
3. Bio Adolf Zytogorski
4. Complete the Olympiad
5. Bio Lorenz Maximilian Drabke

7. Baden-Baden (1870)

11. Karl Mayet
12. Smbat Lputian

Pi Day
rreusser/computing-with-the-bailey-borwein-plouffe-formula">https://observablehq.com/(at)rreusser/...

Pun Index Game Collection: Game of the Day & Puzzle of the Day Collections

>> Click here to see OhioChessFan's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member
   Current net-worth: 792 chessbucks
[what is this?]

   OhioChessFan has kibitzed 49347 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Nov-12-25 J Bars vs M Hohlbein, 2024
 
OhioChessFan: Wow, what an amazing game to review.
 
   Nov-11-25 Morphy vs A Morphy, 1850
 
OhioChessFan: From 7 years ago, I stand corrected. 17...Kb1 18. 0-0 and White is crushing.
 
   Nov-11-25 Chessgames - Music
 
OhioChessFan: I promise you that you have nothing better to do for the next five minutes than to listen to this: Liszt-Liebestraum No. 3 in A Flat Performed by Rubinstein https://youtu.be/fwtIAzFMgeY?si=ebV...
 
   Nov-11-25 Chessgames - Politics (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: I guess I'm glad the Schumer Shutdown is over. I can't say it had any impact on my life.
 
   Nov-09-25 Fusilli chessforum (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: I found the source of a previous puzzle: https://youtu.be/3XkA2ZoVFQo?si=fGG...
 
   Nov-08-25 B Hague vs Plaskett, 2004 (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: Morra, Hague Convention, I like it.
 
   Nov-07-25 C Wells vs J Rush, 1963
 
OhioChessFan: "Fly-By Knight"
 
   Nov-07-25 K Hanache vs P Crocker, 2024
 
OhioChessFan: "Not Two Knights, I Have a Hanache"
 
   Nov-05-25 Niemann vs L Lodici, 2025 (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: White has three Pawns for a poorly placed Knight. I'd rather have the Knight, but as of move 29, I don't see any particular plans for
 
   Nov-04-25 Chessgames - Sports (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: Mike Royko was fantastic. Slats Grobnik was guaranteed to make me laugh myself silly.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Moves Prediction Contest

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 119 OF 849 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-01-10  whatthefat: <YouRang>

Couldn't have said it better myself.

Apr-01-10  whatthefat: By the way, I'd like to give my thanks to <OhioChessFan> for holding this discussion. I've learned a lot about the ideas of those on both sides of the divide, and it's inspired me to learn a bunch of new things about fields I'm both familiar with (science) and totally unfamiliar with (Christianity). I don't think we're any closer to agreeing with each other, but - as others have already expressed -I'm impressed by the overall civility, and feel like we have at least developed a better understanding of why our 'opponents' hold the views they do. It would be fun to continue the discussion over drinks some day. :)
Apr-01-10  playground player: <You Rang> Actually, I don't have a problem with any scientist saying miracles are not his province. Nor would I call anyone a liar for refusing to accept a miracle. After all, the Catholic Church is skeptical of such claims and rejects almost all of them. And Calvinists are even harder to convince. Nevertheless, we presuppose that Scripture is true, and therefor we must insist that miracles do occur. On rare occasions. Subject to the sovereignty of God.

Do some "miracles" turn out to have a naturalistic explanation? Probably most of them.

How did Jesus Christ walk on water? Nobody knows. His ability to perform miracles is part of the proof that He is the Son of God. Nobody here is trying to force anyone else to believe in Him, but we will not back down from our belief.

As for calling Christ's Resurrection a fraud or a magic trick--I think I'll have to leave that alone. I doubt I can comment without losing my temper. (My evangelical skills leave much to be desired.)

Apr-01-10  whatthefat: <playground player: Nevertheless, we presuppose that Scripture is true, and therefor we must insist that miracles do occur. On rare occasions. Subject to the sovereignty of God.

Do some "miracles" turn out to have a naturalistic explanation? Probably most of them. >

It seems then that you do not apply the same rigor to accepting the stories of the Bible as you do to accepting claims made in other scriptures and writings. Why?

Apr-01-10  YouRang: <playground player> My apologies if I lumped you in with the wrong crowd. :-)

<Actually, I don't have a problem with any scientist saying miracles are not his province.>

Perhaps I misunderstood you earlier when you said: <To rule out miracles a priori, or to insist that there is no such thing as the supernatural, seems to me a barrier to understanding. >

I understood that you were speaking in the context of natural science (which was the context of the discussion), but perhaps you were thinking of a wider context beyond science.

<As for calling Christ's Resurrection a fraud ...>

Although that's not a claim I would make, it is a conceivable explanation for some.

If someone chooses to believe it was a fraud, I don't see how it helps the cause of Christianity to get angry about it. Discuss it in a civil manner. Give your reasons and have respect for the other person's opinion. I would even advise being open to the possibility that you're wrong. However, if someone is going to get rude or arrogant, let it be the other person.

"He who is slow to anger has great understanding, but he who is quick-tempered exalts folly." - Proverbs 14:29

Apr-01-10  cormier: or the one whom doesn't talk could be mistaken for wise, in heaven(on earth also) one should not be shy.....tks
Apr-01-10  Boomie: I forgot to include the evolutionary biologist JBS Haldane's funny quote.

Some theologians asked him what could be inferred about the mind of the Creator from the works of His Creation:

"An inordinate fondness for beetles."

There are over 400,000 known species of beetles, which is about 40% of all known insect species.

And here is Haldane's explanation of his atheism.

"My practice as a scientist is atheistic. That is to say, when I set up an experiment I assume no god, angel or devil is going to interfere with its course. I should therefore be intellectually dishonest if I were not also atheistic in the affairs of the world."

Apr-02-10  achieve: Wasn't he able to distinguish between "work" and pleasure? (or pain ;)) ?

Those Biologist are quite the breed, let me tell you...

And I agree; interfering with an experiment would *definitely* be in bad taste. And therefor "not done".

Apr-02-10  cormier: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsK-...
Apr-02-10  cormier: April 2, 2010
Good Friday of the Lord's passion

Reading 1

Is 52:13—53:12

See, my servant shall prosper,

he shall be raised high and greatly exalted.

Even as many were amazed at him

so marred was his look beyond human semblance

and his appearance beyond that of the sons of man

so shall he startle many nations,

because of him kings shall stand speechless;

for those who have not been told shall see,

those who have not heard shall ponder it.

Who would believe what we have heard?

To whom has the arm of the LORD been revealed?

He grew up like a sapling before him,

like a shoot from the parched earth;

there was in him no stately bearing to make us look at him,

nor appearance that would attract us to him.

He was spurned and avoided by people,

a man of suffering, accustomed to infirmity,

one of those from whom people hide their faces,

spurned, and we held him in no esteem.

Yet it was our infirmities that he bore,

our sufferings that he endured,

while we thought of him as stricken,

as one smitten by God and afflicted.

But he was pierced for our offenses,

crushed for our sins;

upon him was the chastisement that makes us whole,

by his stripes we were healed.

We had all gone astray like sheep,

each following his own way;

but the LORD laid upon him

the guilt of us all.

Though he was harshly treated, he submitted

and opened not his mouth;

like a lamb led to the slaughter

or a sheep before the shearers,

he was silent and opened not his mouth.

Oppressed and condemned, he was taken away,

and who would have thought any more of his destiny?

When he was cut off from the land of the living,

and smitten for the sin of his people,

a grave was assigned him among the wicked

and a burial place with evildoers,

though he had done no wrong

nor spoken any falsehood.

But the LORD was pleased

to crush him in infirmity.

If he gives his life as an offering for sin,

he shall see his descendants in a long life,

and the will of the LORD shall be accomplished through him.

Because of his affliction

he shall see the light in fullness of days;

through his suffering, my servant shall justify many,

and their guilt he shall bear.

Therefore I will give him his portion among the great,

and he shall divide the spoils with the mighty,

because he surrendered himself to death

and was counted among the wicked;

and he shall take away the sins of many,

and win pardon for their offenses.

Ps 31:2, 6, 12-13, 15-16, 17, 25 Responsorial Psalm R. (Lk 23:46) Father, into your hands I commend my spirit.

In you, O LORD, I take refuge;

let me never be put to shame.

In your justice rescue me.

Into your hands I commend my spirit;

you will redeem me, O LORD, O faithful God.

R. Father, into your hands I commend my spirit.

For all my foes I am an object of reproach,

a laughingstock to my neighbors, and a dread to my friends;

they who see me abroad flee from me.

I am forgotten like the unremembered dead;

I am like a dish that is broken.

R. Father, into your hands I commend my spirit.

But my trust is in you, O LORD;

I say, “You are my God.

In your hands is my destiny; rescue me

from the clutches of my enemies and my persecutors.”

R. Father, into your hands I commend my spirit.

Let your face shine upon your servant;

save me in your kindness.

Take courage and be stouthearted,

all you who hope in the LORD.

R. Father, into your hands I commend my spirit.

Heb 4:14-16; 5:7-9 Reading 2 Brothers and sisters:

Since we have a great high priest who has passed through the heavens,

Jesus, the Son of God,

let us hold fast to our confession.

For we do not have a high priest

who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses,

but one who has similarly been tested in every way,

yet without sin.

So let us confidently approach the throne of grace

to receive mercy and to find grace for timely help.

In the days when Christ was in the flesh,

he offered prayers and supplications with loud cries and tears

to the one who was able to save him from death,

and he was heard because of his reverence.

Son though he was, he learned obedience from what he suffered;

and when he was made perfect,

he became the source of eternal salvation for all who obey him.

Apr-02-10  playground player: <whatthefat> I presuppose the Bible to be true, and a true revelation of God, and reason downward from there. If I were to try to presuppose that polytheism is also true, I would not be able to reason at all, by the law of non-contradiction. If I start throwing out the Bible, or even pieces of it, then something else becomes my god.

<You Rang> I would rather not speak at all, than risk saying something that would impugn my own witness. That's why I was worried about losing my temper. As Sun Tzu said, "A general who loses his temper can be made a fool of."

I am aware that not everyone believes, as I believe, that Jesus Christ rose from the dead and is the one and only Savior of mankind. I wish I knew how to convince people that this is so, but I don't.

However, knowing my limitations, I thought it best, yesterday, to just shut up for a while. When the emotions are engaged, reason can fly right out the window. When you feel yourself getting angry, it's usually a good idea to zip your lip--so that's what I did.

God understands people's limitations better than we understand them. God is much slower to anger than we are. Which is not to say that men insult Him with impunity!

Again, I don't mind if a scientist is wrong, I don't mind if he doesn't want to consider miracles in his worldview... But I do mind when a "scientist" like James Hanson, David Suzuki, or Neal DeGrasse Tyson hides data, suppresses criticism, vilifies those who question him, and knowingly deceives the public for the sake of his own personal aggrandizement. And it should be pointed out that Richard Dawkins was a nobody until he started attacking Christianity--so now he's a filthy rich nobody. (Temper, temper...!)

Apr-02-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: <by the law of non-contradiction> but the concept of God itself would be above all laws no ?
Apr-02-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: if one applied laws as defined by our own perception, then how could Jesus have risen from the dead ?

if God makes all things possible, could it be that God reveals the Truth to people in different ways ?

Apr-02-10  whatthefat: <playground player: <whatthefat> I presuppose the Bible to be true, and a true revelation of God, and reason downward from there. If I were to try to presuppose that polytheism is also true, I would not be able to reason at all, by the law of non-contradiction. If I start throwing out the Bible, or even pieces of it, then something else becomes my god.>

But then your argument is no better than that of a Muslim who says to me:

<I presuppose the Qu'ran to be true, and a true revelation of Allah, and reason downward from there. If I were to try to presuppose that Christianity is also true, I would not be able to reason at all, by the law of non-contradiction. If I start throwing out the Qur'an, or even pieces of it, then something else becomes my god.>

And I'm sure you can see that there are many ways to fill in the blanks. The problem with uncritically assuming one scripture is true, is that all further arguments reduce to circular reasoning, e.g., I assume the Bible is true, therefore the Resurrection is true because the Bible said so. This argument is also problematic because the reports of the Resurrection are not consistent with each other, meaning if you take every word of the Bible to be true then you are forced to break the law of non-contradiction anyway.

Apr-02-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: Saul of Tarsus persecuted Christians and was there watching and urging the crowd as Stephen was stoned to death. Saul then sought and received a letter from the high priest so he could go to Damascus to arrest more Christians when something happened on his way there. He was blinded by a light and fell of his Horse. He heard a voice saying :

<Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me?” And Saul said, “Who are You, Lord?” Then the Lord said, “I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting. It is hard for you to kick against the goads.” So Saul, trembling and astonished, said, “Lord, what do You want me to do?” Then the Lord said to him, “Arise and go into the city, and you will be told what you must do.”>

Something happened to the guy. His later devotion to Christianity was huge.

Apr-02-10  YouRang: <playground player> <...But I do mind when a "scientist" like James Hanson, David Suzuki, or Neal DeGrasse Tyson hides data, suppresses criticism, vilifies those who question him, and knowingly deceives the public for the sake of his own personal aggrandizement. And it should be pointed out that Richard Dawkins was a nobody until he started attacking Christianity--so now he's a filthy rich nobody. (Temper, temper...!)>

Well, it flows both ways. I'm sure some scientists get riled up when they see science being attacked by religion in deceptive ways.

I give credit to science for standing on a "higher ground" in the religion vs. science battle:

- At least scientists have not subjected religionists to cruel persecution.

- At least scientists can claim to have been on the side of truth in historical battles.

Apr-02-10  YouRang: <chancho><Something happened to the guy. His later devotion to Christianity was huge.>

The story of Paul's conversion is pretty remarkable. :-)

Apr-02-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <YouRang> Well, I'm not trying to convince anyone.:-)

I remember when George Foreman got his butt handed to him by Jimmy Young in San Juan, and became ill in his dressing room. The events as told in Wiki:

<He was suffering from exhaustion and heatstroke and believed he had a near death experience. He claimed he found himself in a hellish, frightening place of nothingness and despair. He began to plead with God to help him. He explained that he sensed God asking him to change his life and ways. After this experience, Foreman became a born-again Christian, dedicating his life for the next decade to Christianity.>

Who's to say that George did not really have a vision? Perhaps Paul too was suffering from heatstroke and was hallucinating? :-)

Apr-02-10  cormier: i've got to send my next posttoday.....tks
Apr-02-10  cormier: Gospel Jesus went out with his disciples across the Kidron valley

to where there was a garden,

into which he and his disciples entered.

Judas his betrayer also knew the place,

because Jesus had often met there with his disciples.

So Judas got a band of soldiers and guards

from the chief priests and the Pharisees

and went there with lanterns, torches, and weapons.

Jesus, knowing everything that was going to happen to him,

went out and said to them, “Whom are you looking for?”

They answered him, “Jesus the Nazorean.”

He said to them, “I AM.”

Judas his betrayer was also with them.

When he said to them, “I AM, “

they turned away and fell to the ground.

So he again asked them,

“Whom are you looking for?”

They said, “Jesus the Nazorean.”

Jesus answered,

“I told you that I AM.

So if you are looking for me, let these men go.”

This was to fulfill what he had said,

“I have not lost any of those you gave me.”

Then Simon Peter, who had a sword, drew it,

struck the high priest’s slave, and cut off his right ear.

The slave’s name was Malchus.

Jesus said to Peter,

“Put your sword into its scabbard.

Shall I not drink the cup that the Father gave me?”

So the band of soldiers, the tribune, and the Jewish guards seized Jesus,

bound him, and brought him to Annas first.

He was the father-in-law of Caiaphas,

who was high priest that year.

It was Caiaphas who had counseled the Jews

that it was better that one man should die rather than the people.

Simon Peter and another disciple followed Jesus.

Now the other disciple was known to the high priest,

and he entered the courtyard of the high priest with Jesus.

But Peter stood at the gate outside.

So the other disciple, the acquaintance of the high priest,

went out and spoke to the gatekeeper and brought Peter in.

Then the maid who was the gatekeeper said to Peter,

“You are not one of this man’s disciples, are you?”

He said, “I am not.”

Now the slaves and the guards were standing around a charcoal fire

that they had made, because it was cold,

and were warming themselves.

Peter was also standing there keeping warm.

The high priest questioned Jesus

about his disciples and about his doctrine.

Jesus answered him,

“I have spoken publicly to the world.

I have always taught in a synagogue

or in the temple area where all the Jews gather,

and in secret I have said nothing. Why ask me?

Ask those who heard me what I said to them.

They know what I said.”

When he had said this,

one of the temple guards standing there struck Jesus and said,

“Is this the way you answer the high priest?”

Jesus answered him,

“If I have spoken wrongly, testify to the wrong;

but if I have spoken rightly, why do you strike me?”

Then Annas sent him bound to Caiaphas the high priest.

Now Simon Peter was standing there keeping warm.

And they said to him,

“You are not one of his disciples, are you?”

He denied it and said,

“I am not.”

One of the slaves of the high priest,

a relative of the one whose ear Peter had cut off, said,

“Didn’t I see you in the garden with him?”

Again Peter denied it.

And immediately the cock crowed.

Apr-02-10  cormier: Then they brought Jesus from Caiaphas to the praetorium.

It was morning.

And they themselves did not enter the praetorium,

in order not to be defiled so that they could eat the Passover.

So Pilate came out to them and said,

“What charge do you bring against this man?”

They answered and said to him,

“If he were not a criminal,

we would not have handed him over to you.”

At this, Pilate said to them,

“Take him yourselves, and judge him according to your law.”

The Jews answered him,

“We do not have the right to execute anyone, “

in order that the word of Jesus might be fulfilled

that he said indicating the kind of death he would die.

So Pilate went back into the praetorium

and summoned Jesus and said to him,

“Are you the King of the Jews?”

Jesus answered,

“Do you say this on your own

or have others told you about me?”

Pilate answered,

“I am not a Jew, am I?

Your own nation and the chief priests handed you over to me.

What have you done?”

Jesus answered,

“My kingdom does not belong to this world.

If my kingdom did belong to this world,

my attendants would be fighting

to keep me from being handed over to the Jews.

But as it is, my kingdom is not here.”

So Pilate said to him,

“Then you are a king?”

Jesus answered,

“You say I am a king.

For this I was born and for this I came into the world,

to testify to the truth.

Everyone who belongs to the truth listens to my voice.”

Pilate said to him, “What is truth?”

When he had said this,

he again went out to the Jews and said to them,

“I find no guilt in him.

But you have a custom that I release one prisoner to you at Passover.

Do you want me to release to you the King of the Jews?”

They cried out again,

“Not this one but Barabbas!”

Now Barabbas was a revolutionary.

Then Pilate took Jesus and had him scourged.

And the soldiers wove a crown out of thorns and placed it on his head,

and clothed him in a purple cloak,

and they came to him and said,

“Hail, King of the Jews!”

And they struck him repeatedly.

Once more Pilate went out and said to them,

“Look, I am bringing him out to you,

so that you may know that I find no guilt in him.”

So Jesus came out,

wearing the crown of thorns and the purple cloak.

And he said to them, “Behold, the man!”

When the chief priests and the guards saw him they cried out,

“Crucify him, crucify him!”

Pilate said to them,

“Take him yourselves and crucify him.

I find no guilt in him.”

The Jews answered,

“We have a law, and according to that law he ought to die,

because he made himself the Son of God.”

Now when Pilate heard this statement,

he became even more afraid,

and went back into the praetorium and said to Jesus,

“Where are you from?”

Jesus did not answer him.

So Pilate said to him,

“Do you not speak to me?

Do you not know that I have power to release you

and I have power to crucify you?”

Jesus answered him,

“You would have no power over me

if it had not been given to you from above.

For this reason the one who handed me over to you

has the greater sin.”

Consequently, Pilate tried to release him; but the Jews cried out,

“If you release him, you are not a Friend of Caesar.

Everyone who makes himself a king opposes Caesar.”

When Pilate heard these words he brought Jesus out

and seated him on the judge’s bench

in the place called Stone Pavement, in Hebrew, Gabbatha.

It was preparation day for Passover, and it was about noon.

And he said to the Jews,

“Behold, your king!”

They cried out,

“Take him away, take him away! Crucify him!”

Pilate said to them,

“Shall I crucify your king?”

The chief priests answered,

“We have no king but Caesar.”

Then he handed him over to them to be crucified.

So they took Jesus, and, carrying the cross himself,

he went out to what is called the Place of the Skull,

in Hebrew, Golgotha.

There they crucified him, and with him two others,

one on either side, with Jesus in the middle.

Pilate also had an inscription written and put on the cross.

It read,

“Jesus the Nazorean, the King of the Jews.”

Now many of the Jews read this inscription,

because the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city;

and it was written in Hebrew, Latin, and Greek.

So the chief priests of the Jews said to Pilate,

“Do not write ‘The King of the Jews,’

but that he said, ‘I am the King of the Jews’.”

Pilate answered,

“What I have written, I have written.”

Apr-02-10  cormier: When the soldiers had crucified Jesus,

they took his clothes and divided them into four shares,

a share for each soldier.

They also took his tunic, but the tunic was seamless,

woven in one piece from the top down.

So they said to one another,

“Let’s not tear it, but cast lots for it to see whose it will be, “

in order that the passage of Scripture might be fulfilled that says:

They divided my garments among them,

and for my vesture they cast lots.

This is what the soldiers did.

Standing by the cross of Jesus were his mother

and his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas,

and Mary of Magdala.

When Jesus saw his mother and the disciple there whom he loved

he said to his mother, “Woman, behold, your son.”

Then he said to the disciple,

“Behold, your mother.”

And from that hour the disciple took her into his home.

After this, aware that everything was now finished,

in order that the Scripture might be fulfilled,

Jesus said, “I thirst.”

There was a vessel filled with common wine.

So they put a sponge soaked in wine on a sprig of hyssop

and put it up to his mouth.

When Jesus had taken the wine, he said,

“It is finished.”

And bowing his head, he handed over the spirit.

Here all kneel and pause for a short time.

Now since it was preparation day,

in order that the bodies might not remain on the cross on the sabbath,

for the sabbath day of that week was a solemn one,

the Jews asked Pilate that their legs be broken

and that they be taken down.

So the soldiers came and broke the legs of the first

and then of the other one who was crucified with Jesus.

But when they came to Jesus and saw that he was already dead,

they did not break his legs,

but one soldier thrust his lance into his side,

and immediately blood and water flowed out.

An eyewitness has testified, and his testimony is true;

he knows that he is speaking the truth,

so that you also may come to believe.

For this happened so that the Scripture passage might be fulfilled:

Not a bone of it will be broken.

And again another passage says:

They will look upon him whom they have pierced.

After this, Joseph of Arimathea,

secretly a disciple of Jesus for fear of the Jews,

asked Pilate if he could remove the body of Jesus.

And Pilate permitted it.

So he came and took his body.

Nicodemus, the one who had first come to him at night,

also came bringing a mixture of myrrh and aloes

weighing about one hundred pounds.

They took the body of Jesus

and bound it with burial cloths along with the spices,

according to the Jewish burial custom.

Now in the place where he had been crucified there was a garden,

and in the garden a new tomb, in which no one had yet been buried.

So they laid Jesus there because of the Jewish preparation day;

for the tomb was close by.

Apr-02-10  YouRang: <cormier> It is also possible to provide a link, such as:

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage...

Saves a lot of hassle...

Apr-02-10  Boomie: <Standing by the cross of Jesus were his mother and his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary of Magdala. When Jesus saw his mother and the disciple there whom he loved he said to his mother, “Woman, behold, your son.” Then he said to the disciple, “Behold, your mother.” And from that hour the disciple took her into his home.>

I'm a little confused about this passage. Who is the disciple? At first I thought it refers to Mary of Magdala, who was a disciple and was favored by Jesus, but later it says Mary the Mother was taken into "his" home. So I guess it's someone who wasn't mentioned in the list of people who were there. Why didn't they name him? Or maybe the text was mistranslated and it actually said "her home".

Anybody know who this was?

Apr-03-10  YouRang: <Boomie> This passage is from John's gospel, and I believe that the disciple "whom he loved" was John's way of referring to himself.

The understanding is that Jesus was asking John to look after his mother Mary, and for Mary to regard John as a son.

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 849)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 119 OF 849 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Participating Grandmasters are Not Allowed Here!

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC