<A deeply devout Justice, Brewer declared that the U.S. is a "Christian nation" in Church of Holy Trinity v. U.S. in 1892. Like his descriptions of women in Muller, this claim has grated on modern ears.>

Well said . Indeed , claim that 'america is a Christian nation ' grates on modern area.

America is not a Christian nation .

2) i think <susan freeman> too has ability, maturity, character to change her position when faced with reason, logic, evidence

I think <susan freeman> now understands that

(i) america is not a christian country. America is not a christian nation

(ii) posts of <the integrity> are not educational and entertaining.

Posts of <the intrgrity> are stupid, ridiculous, cancerous, venomous, racist, fascist, nazi, bigotted, genocidal.

(iii) i am biggest supporter of <freedom of speech>, <difference of opinion > and have contempt for censorship.

Kinda like what happened with Biden, when everyone said there was nothing wrong with him>

<Susan freeman> may have a point here, if she is implying that some/many left wingers here are partisan - they were too soft on Biden .

<stone free or die> said that <<fsr> is equal opportunity insulter towards all religions >

Just as <fsr> is 'non partisan' in his criticism of religions , <fsr> and other left wingers should be non partisan in criticising incompetence/corruption etc of politicians - in case they are not .

<keypusher> - he is a right winger but he is totally 'non-partisan' in his criticism of incompetence/corruption etc of politicians .

People should emulate that kind of objectivity/detachment

<Susan freeman> may have a point here

Now , may be <Susan freeman> is implying <"hey left wingers of politics forum , you complain/accuse that " <susan freeman> comes across as a right winger partisan . She should , as owner of this site , should be non partisan . Kind of like <keypusher> , who is a right winger but non partisan .

What is worse , <Susan freeman> comes across as aligned with <the integrity> who is a dishonest , stupid liar, racist, fascist , nazi , genocidal etc "

But left wingers , you yourselves are stupidly partisan ">

I am with <Susan freeman> and <check it out> on this - nothing to hold against <Annie k.> or <Susan freeman> .

All that has been repeated, explained umpteen times already . It is unfair to 'make '/'force' <Susan freeman> repeat all this again and again - making her kind of defend herself all over again and again .

P.S. Good to see you again, <Lloyd Gross>.>

You are an idiot <areknames> , with very low iq . So I do not expect to grasp what even much smarter people here could not grasp - they could not grasp what i was doing .

Immoral <the integrity> gets his 'power' of his stupid , immoral , venomous , cancerous trolling by deceiving/fooling others . So , it was important to show <Susan freeman> the reality of this low life idiot <the integrity> .

Hopefully , now , <Susan freeman> understands and sees the reality of immoral <the integrity> .

Hopefully , malignancy of malignant tumor of this forum and site has been significantly reduced now .

Presumably, <Susan freeman> has decent level of integrity .

I think after my conversation with <Susan freeman>, she might have seen that <stone free or die> , <keypusher> , <fsr> and many others are right in seeing <the integrity>/<Big pawn> as malignant cancer.

2) <areknames> is new here , so he might not know that the rule number 3 that he appears to want to be applied selectively was once indeed applied here along with other rules and his hero <Big pawn>/<the integrity> was repeatedly banned as a result and <the integrity> is such a sore loser that he created huge ruckus about it .

Point is that perhaps <Susan freeman> would want to enforce rules in this forum as she did once in past and perhaps everyone except <the integrity> and his low life idiots would welcome that , however , I think <Susan freeman> has conceded defeat to <the integrity> - she has accepted that this site does not have resources to enforce rules given the problems <the integrity> caused last time . Immorality , hooliganism of <the integrity> won and had its way . Somebody tell this to low life idiot <areknames> lest he should humiliate himself once again by invoking rule number 3 or whatever

2) i am saying that <Susan freeman> has repeatedly said that this site does not have resources to enforce rules in this forum.

3) i am saying that if rules are broken so frequently and blatantly in player or game pages , this site would be forced to do something about it

4) i am saying that if this site does not have resources to enforce rules in this forum , then thst is fine by me - one has to come to terms with reality on ground

5) i am saying that after my conversation with <Susan freeman> , she appears to have understood that <stone free or die> , <keypusher> , <fsr> and others are right in saying that <the integrity>/<Big pawn> is a malignant cancer And that some/many people are disappointed when <Susan freeman> appears to be 'aligned' with malignant cancer <the integrity>/<Big pawn>.

And if <Susan freeman > has understood that , then she deserves respect.

6) i am saying that conversations of i and <stone free or die> were principled not personal . And at least my conversation is complete and i would like to move on . If someone wants any clarity , I would respond , otherwise , I would want to move on and focus on other conversations now .

I was curious to see if this problem could be dissolved - if this problem could be ended .

<<keypusher: <At the height of American slavery, 78% of slave owners were ethnic Jews.>

How f***ing dumb do you have to be to swallow something like this? How ignorant of American history and demographics? As dumb and ignorant as <woodpile>.

And why would <woodpile> even care? When has he cared about blacks being mistreated? Never. He just hates Jews more than he hates blacks>>

And that brings to mind the question that <keypusher> asked <the integrity> <why do you post such obvious , stupid , blatant lies - i am curious >

There is a real possibility that <the integrity> himself does not believe those obvious , stupid lies that he posts non stop , however , he hopes that his supporters like <gezafan> , <areknames> , <Lloyd gross> would believe those stupid propaganda and lies . This fool <the integrity> believes in his bigoted cause with the fervor that an Islamic jihadi has for his own bigoted cause . I think this fool <the integrity> believes that spreading lies , misinformation , stupid false propaganda to serve his cause is allowed , Jesus approves of it the same way god of Islamic jihadi approves of their acts - at least that is what both Islamic jihadis and <the integrity> believe , i think .

That is why I had a conversation with <Susan freeman> so that she could see why <stone free or fie> and many others see <the integrity > as malignant cancer and why people are surprised when <Susan freeman> finds venomous , stupid posts of <the integrity> as educational and entertaining.

sorry to interupt, but aren't the tampons for the trans women? Serious question. I get bewildered>

Yes , <Susan freeman> , you are right - except for terminology/jargon

Transgender women are those people who were assigned male at birth but who identify/feel they are women

Transgender men are those people who were assigned female at birth , they may still have female part biologically but psychologically/emotionally they feel they are men

Unless surgically or hormonally altered , transgender men have female primary sex characteristics though they may have secondary male sex characteristics .

So some places perhaps have tampons for transgender men jn men bathrooms

How come India has 2bi people and we stuck with sthe SAME @#$%* NOZZLE??>

<susan freeman> should take a note that <keyser soze> comes here only to ruin this forum .

I think by now everyone , including <Susan freeman> , knows that <the integrity> is an idiot and so are his elite fools like <gezafan> , <keyser soze> , <diceman> .

Well , that statement of <Susan freeman> is not very clear . It needs elaboration , clarity.

1) Muslims represent about 9% of NYC’s population.

NYC has the largest Muslim population of any U.S. city, but Muslims are still a very small , tiny minority compared to other groups.

2) Minnesota has about 114,000 Muslims, roughly 2% of the state’s population.

, Muslims remain a small minority overall

Now , <the integrity> is an idiot and a dishonest person but in my opinion , <Susan freeman> is intelligent and honest, so I want to understand what exactly her point is .

Here is one of the possibilities - Surveys show that 4 in 10 Britons feel Muslim immigrants have a negative impact, and over half think Islam is “not compatible with British values”

That , however , is a debate about integration not demographic dominance or some such .

So , perhaps point of <Susan freeman> is that even 9 percent Muslims in a western city is bad because Muslims can not be integrated with western cities .

Contrast it with what you do <dicemant> - low life idiots like you just hurl insults . That is all you ever do in this forum . You are stupid and incapable of having any substantive conversation . However , that is not the problem . Problem is that you are unaware of your limitations . A person should know his/her limitations. Know your limitations , <diceman> and then try to grow brain . I and other people here can help you with that .

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...

<FOUR in 10 Britons feel Muslim migrants have a negative impact on the UK – and more than half think Islam is not compatible with British values, according to a survey>

https://www.thenational.scot/news/2...

<Half of public think Islam not compatible with British values Recent survey found four in 10 polled think Muslim immigrants have a negative impact on the UK>

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...

I think these articles/surveys are pertinent to whatever point <Susan freeman> is making .

Once again - <the integrity> and his elite fools like <diceman> are stupid , dishonest people , children of lesser god who are incapable of making intelligent , honest posts . Their posts drag down the quality of this forum . I am sure by now <Susan freeman> and almost everyone else can see that

Here is what happened in Minneapolis and why post of <the integrity> is stupid and/or dishonest :

Officials said the woman attempted to run over agents with her vehicle, and the agent fired in self-defense

A local resident reported the woman was turning her car around and trying to leave when she was shot, disputing ICE’s claim

The shooting drew large protests, with Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey calling ICE’s actions “reckless”. DHS labeled the incident as part of a “domestic terrorism” threat

Claim of <the integrity>: “Liberals attacked ICE agents, ICE defended themselves.”

Reality: No credible reports describe the attacker as a “liberal” or politically motivated protester. The victim was a woman in a car; whether she posed a threat is disputed.

Protests: Demonstrations afterward were political, with many criticizing ICE’s presence in Minneapolis, but the shooting itself was not confirmed as a partisan attack.

By now <Susan freeman> must have realized that

1) i focus on facts , stats , data , understanding different points of view

2) <the integrity> , <diceman> , <keyser soze> can not post substantive posts. They post stupid , dishonest posts at their best and gossip , insults at their worst .

Broader Quranic Principles

Freedom of conscience: "There is no compulsion in religion" (Quran 2:256).

Justice and equity: The Quran emphasizes justice (‘adl’) and fairness (‘qist’) as central values.

Peaceful coexistence: Muslims are instructed to live peacefully with those who do not fight them

Claim : Quran says kill all non-believers

False – applies only to hostile treaty-breakers in wartime

Claim : Islam promotes violence against infidels

False – Quran emphasizes justice, mercy, and freedom of belief

Claim : Surah 9:5 is universal

False – it was a specific wartime directive, not a general rule

The Bible does contain a passage in the Old Testament that prescribes death for someone working on the Sabbath.

Specifically, Numbers 15:32–36 describes a man gathering wood on the Sabbath, and God commands Moses that he should be put to death by stoning

Old Testament Law: This command comes from the Mosaic Law given to the Israelites. The Sabbath was considered a sacred covenant sign between God and Israel (Exodus 31:14–15). Breaking it was treated as a serious offense

Exodus 31:14–15: Reinforces this law: “Anyone who desecrates it must be put to death; those who do any work on that day must be cut off from their people.”

In Christianity, the New Testament shifts the focus. Jesus emphasizes that “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath” (Mark 2:27).

Early Christians did not enforce the death penalty for Sabbath-breaking. Instead, the emphasis moved toward spiritual rest and freedom in Christ.

Most Christian traditions today interpret Sabbath laws as symbolic or spiritual, not legal punishments

The Old Testament law prescribed death for working on the Sabbath.

Context matters: It applied specifically to ancient Israel under Mosaic Law.