To go into administration means that a club is insolvent and cannot pay its debts. A court then appoinst a special administration in hopes that it can save the club from liquidation.

<So if your ball is sitting on a bed of leaves, you can't even touch the leaves before hitting the ball.> You can unless it is a hazard and so long as the ball does not move.

Yesterday they pulled the grass that had been hit to ensure it was attached to the ground.

Then that <night¡ someone watching on TV ( a Sports Illustrated reporter) called the tournament officials to tell them he thought she had dropped the ball too close to the hole, and that she should have taken a penalty.

Probably this is more information than you desire but a "hazard" in golf is identified on the course, usually by red stakes.

The thing about the Davis saga on Sunday is that a hazard has a special rule-which Wie-violated: the player can take a drop from the hazard no closer to the hole, at the spot the ball entered the hazard.

In Davis' case, there was actually a special drop area which gave him a legitimate shot at chipping in for par. In other words, it wasn't clear that hitting out of the hazard was even the right play even if he hadn't violated the rules.

I could see penalizing Wie at the time, but after a TV viewer calls in that night? Ridiculous.

Yes. The player cannot ground her club or move any loose impediment (the rule violated Sunday).

Don't like it?! Move! Move to New Mexico, Texas, California, Nevada, or Colorado! Or anywhere else... North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, New York, Vermont, Washington, even Canada!!

This is <NOT> 1938, (where countries like U.S. refused to accept Jews, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS_St....) Oh, yeah, some Democrate, named FDR was in charge!

I don't care what the left-wingers are saying. There is a reason for international-borders, and international law.

If you are legal, and stopped, possibly harassed, sue! Sue the city/county/state for discrimination! Heck, sue Uncle Sam! What is stopping you?

Being Latino and an immigrant myself, I can’t help to feel some sympathy for people who come to the US. However, I am aware of the problems that uncontrolled immigration can bring. This is why I think that one of the first things that the government should do is protect the border better so that the influx of immigrants coming into the country can be under control. Now, I think I read that about 45% of those who are here illegally, entered the country with a visa, but decided to stay after it expired. Still, many choose not to see this and decide to group all of them as “fence jumpers.”

Regarding the new Arizona law: I don’t think this is going to solve the problem at all. If I understand the law correctly, anyone who is suspicious of being illegal can be questioned and forced to provide proper documentation of their legal status. However, I don’t see how this can law can be put into effect impartially. Suppose the police stops a typical American person (white, whatever) and then stops another person who looks Mexican (whatever that means) – who do you think the police is more likely to ask for their documents? It will not take a genius to show statistically that the police will be biased against the Hispanic looking population. I give you my word on this.

It is racial profiling, plain and simple. I understand the government needs to do something about immigration, but using fear tactics like the AZ law is not the way to go. Ignoring the problem will certainly not make it go away either. Giving amnesty to all 11 million undocumented immigrants is also not the way to go. But I do believe that providing a path to legalize the status of a fraction of those 11 million who meet a specified criterion should be worked out soon. Marginalizing them will not solve one thing.

http://www.miox.com/miox-solutions/...

As you can easily imagine, the methodology of water purification is much more complicated than that, and anyway just remember miracles do not exist :)