chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

chancho
Member since May-16-05
<Jer 20:10-13

Jeremiah said:

"I hear the whisperings of many:
'Terror on every side!
Denounce!
Let us denounce him!'
All those who were my friends are on the watch for any misstep of mine.

Perhaps he'll be trapped; then we can prevail, and take our vengeance on him.

But the LORD is with me, like a mighty champion: my persecutors will stumble, they will not triumph.

In their failure, they will be put to utter shame, to lasting, unforgettable confusion.

O LORD of hosts, you who test the just, who probe mind and heart, let me witness the vengeance you take on them, for to you, I have entrusted my cause.

Sing to the LORD,
praise the LORD,
for he has rescued the life of the poor
from the power of the wicked!">

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<1 Corinthians 13

13 If I speak in the tongues of men or of angels, but do not have love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. 2 If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. 3 If I give all I possess to the poor and give over my body to hardship that I may boast, but do not have love, I gain nothing.

4 Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. 5 It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.

8 Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away.

9 For we know only in part, and we prophesy only in part; 10 but when the complete comes, the partial will come to an end. 11 When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child; when I became an adult, I put an end to childish ways. 12 For now we see in a mirror, dimly, but then we will see face to face. Now I know only in part; then I will know fully, even as I have been fully known. 13 And now faith, hope, and love abide, these three; and the greatest of these is love.>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<The Promise of the Lord's Coming

The Second Letter of Peter

Chapter 3

1 This is now, beloved, the second letter I am writing to you; in them I am trying to arouse your sincere intention by reminding you

2 that you should remember the words spoken in the past by the holy prophets, and the commandment of the Lord and Savior spoken through your apostles.

3 First of all you must understand this, that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and indulging their own lusts

4 and saying, Where is the promise of his coming? For ever since our ancestors died, all things continue as they were from the beginning of creation!?

5 They deliberately ignore this fact, that by the word of God heavens existed long ago and an earth was formed out of water and by means of water,

6 through which the world of that time was deluged with water and perished.

7 But by the same word the present heavens and earth have been reserved for fire, being kept until the day of judgment and destruction of the godless.

8 But do not ignore this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like one day.

9 The Lord is not slow about his promise, as some think of slowness, but is patient with you, not wanting any to perish, but all to come to repentance.

10 But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a loud noise, and the elements will be dissolved with fire, and the earth and everything that is done on it will be disclosed.

11 Since all these things are to be dissolved in this way, what sort of persons ought you to be in leading lives of holiness and godliness,

12 waiting for and hastening the coming of the day of God, because of which the heavens will be set ablaze and dissolved, and the elements will melt with fire?

13 But, in accordance with his promise, we wait for new heavens and a new earth, where righteousness is at home.

Final Exhortation and Doxology

14 Therefore, beloved, while you are waiting for these things, strive to be found by him at peace, without spot or blemish;

15 and regard the patience of our Lord as salvation. So also our beloved brother Paul wrote to you according to the wisdom given him,

16 speaking of this as he does in all his letters. There are some things in them hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other scriptures.

17 You therefore beloved, since you are forewarned, beware that you are not carried away with the error of the lawless and lose your own stability.

18 But grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be the glory both now and to the day of eternity.

Amen.>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<Psalm 23

The Lord is my shepherd; there is nothing I shall not want.

2 He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: he leadeth me beside the still waters.

3 He restoreth my soul: he leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for his name's sake.

4 Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me.

5 Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies: thou anointest my head with oil; my cup runneth over.

6 Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life: and I will dwell in the house of the Lord for ever.>

Chessgames.com Full Member

   chancho has kibitzed 44554 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Sep-22-25 A Kimmel (replies)
 
chancho: Look who's back!
 
   Sep-20-25 Chessgames - Sports (replies)
 
chancho: I see nary a mention of Terrance Crawford defeating Canelo Alvarez on this page. First guy to win undisputed championships in three weight divisions. Henry Armstrong won three back in the 30's, but they were not undisputed. Manny Pacquiao won 8... but again, not undisputed. Crawford
 
   Aug-14-25 Chessgames - Guys and Dolls (replies)
 
chancho: More, More, More. (Andrea True)
 
   Jun-07-25 Norway Chess (2025) (replies)
 
chancho: He left the championship on his own terms. He has won everything in sight. No better way to exit the stage.
 
   Jun-03-25 D Gukesh vs Carlsen, 2025 (replies)
 
chancho: Also called: The Angry Fist.
 
   May-27-25 Carlsen vs D Gukesh, 2025 (replies)
 
chancho: <Poor is the apprentice who does not surpass his Master.”" - Leonardo da Vinci>
 
   May-24-25 Bogdan Pietrusiak
 
chancho: His highest rating was 2310 according to this link which translates in Polish and Spanish: https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogda...
 
   May-09-25 Chessgames - Music (replies)
 
chancho: All this Steely Dan talk... Here's a song from 1973: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-h-...
 
   Apr-29-25 perfidious chessforum (replies)
 
chancho: Perf, just heard about this: <The White House has hit back against a reported plan by Amazon to detail the price impact of Donald Trump's trade tariffs to its customers, calling it a "hostile" political act.> https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c... It's like, how dare Amazon
 
   Apr-26-25 John Eyre (replies)
 
chancho: From Tournament: 33rd Hastings Premier 1957/58... One-Week Open B: (1) <John Eyre> (London N14) 4½/5; (2) Peter Merrett (East Grinstead) 3½; (3) William Arnold Parkin-Moore (Mitcheldean) 2½; (4) N. W. Robinson 2; (5) R. L. Baker 1½; (6) Lewis James Worsell 1. ...
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Chess and Things

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 62 OF 200 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-17-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  kwgurge: < isemeria: What do people think about the English Attack of the Najdorf with 6...e5? >

I'd love it! But, I don't think he'll play 6.Be3.

Aug-17-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ron: One of Nickel's games, with him playing White, started 1. Nf3 d5 2. c4 Admittedly, this seems to be a rare opening in his games. In the event we go into it, I suggest we play 2. .. d4. It was advocated by Tarrasch, and played by Fischer.
Aug-18-08  Artar1: Following <kwid’s> lead, I have been exploring the Najdorf Sicilian, and have found some resources for Black when a Scheveningen style of play is adopted against 6.f3, a line played by <GMAN> in a recent game. Here is my work in progress: <1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.f3 e6> This time around I tried the Scheveningen-style to see whether a more complex position resulted.

<7.Be3 b5> is by far the most popular move and has been played by the luminaries of chess: Kasparov, Anand, Kramnik, and Topalov. White's choice here is to 1) challenge Black's pawn advance with either a3 or a4, 2) play the queen to d2 in preparation for queenside castling, or 3) begin kingside operations with g4. The last two choices have brought the highest number of wins for White so they will be investigated here.

<8.Qd2 Nbd7> The other choice is 8...b4, which is favored by Topalov. The knight move is a little slower and perhaps more strategic, as the knight finds its way eventually to c4. White's response to ...Nbd7 is more difficult: castle now or play g4, which is the more popular choice. If <GMAN> is playing conservatively, he may opt for castling, but then White's win/draw percentage drops to 43%.

<9.g4 Nb6> The other alternative is ...h6 to discourage the advance of White's g4-pawn. For move 10, White's choices include 0–0–0, Qf2, a4, and Bd3.

<10.a4>

[10.Qf2 Nfd7 11.0–0–0 Bb7 12.Bd3 Rc8 13.Nce2 Nc5 14.Kb1 ]

<10...Nc4 11.Bxc4 bxc4 12.a5 Bb7 13.Na4 d5> Black's win/draw percentage is poor from this point due to substandard middlegame play by Black. Note that playing ...d5 resulted in the only win for Black among elite players.

<14.e5>

[14.g5 Nd7 15.exd5 Bxd5 16.0–0 Rb8 17.Bf4 Bb4 18.c3 Bxa5 19.Bxb8 Qxb8 20.Nc5 Nxc5 21.Rxa5 Qb6 22.Ra2 0–0 23.Qe3 f5 24.Nc2 (Ne2 is worth looking at.) 24...a5 25.Rfa1 f4 26.Qf2 a4 (Instead of ...Qb6.) 27.Nb4 Bb7 ]

<14...Nd7 15.f4 Qh4+ 16.Bf2 Qxg4 17.Rg1 Qh5 18.h4 Be7 19.Rxg7 Nxe5 20.Qe3 Bb4+?> as played in Kritz-Tsarouhas, 2006; better is 20...Ng4! 21.Qe2 Nf6 22.Qe5 Qxe5+ 23.fxe5 Ne4 24.Ke2 Nxf2 25.Kxf2 Kf8 26.Rg4 Rg8 27.Rxg8+ Kxg8

Aug-18-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ron: Another defense that we can play against GM Nickel, if he plays 1. d4, and which I haven't seem much discussion, is the Queen's Gambit Accepted. There are only two games in the database with his as White: http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches... One win and one draw for him. As to his win, I think we play stronger than his opponent in that game. So by playing this opening we go into relatively unexplored territory and having an open game is more our advantage.
Aug-19-08  Boomie: Looking at the alternatives to 7...h6 in the g4 Semi-Slav, this wild-ass variation rates an uneasy equality on the Rybka scale. The mind blowing complexity of this variation should favor our overwhelming analytical power. Still I feel queasy about this position but that's just me. ;->

1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 e6 5. e3 Nbd7 6. Qc2 Bd6 7. g4 <dxc4> 8. Bxc4 O-O 9. g5 Nd5 10. Bd2 f5 11. gxf6 N7xf6 12. Rg1 Qc7 13. O-O-O b5 14. Be2 a5 15. h4 a4 16. Kb1 Kh8 17. e4 b4 18. Nxa4 Nxe4 19. Qxe4 Rxa4 20. Rc1 Qa7


click for larger view

Aug-19-08  Artar1: (19) Akobian,Varuzhan (2570) - Zambrana,Oswaldo (2511) [D45] Cali Continental op 4th Cali (4), 10.07.2007

1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 e6 5.e3 Nbd7 6.Qc2 Bd6 7.g4 h6 8.Bd2 Qe7 9.h3 is Aronian's favorite.

9...dxc4 10.Bxc4 b5 11.Be2 Bb7 12.e4!? is a novelty by Akobian.

12...e5 13.0–0–0

<[13.dxe5 Nxe5 14.Nh4 g6 15.f4 b4 16.0–0–0 bxc3 17.Bxc3 Nfd7 18.fxe5 Bxe5 19.Nf3 Bxc3 20.Qxc3 Black now faces the question as to where to put the king while defending the rook. 20...0–0–0 21.Rhe1 Kb8 22.Rd2 f6 23.Red1 Nb6 24.Rxd8+ Rxd8 25.Rxd8+ Qxd8 26.Qe3 Qe7 27.Nh4 g5 28.Nf5 Maybe a very slight edge for White.]>

13...b4 14.Na4 c5

<[14...exd4 15.Rhe1 0–0 16.Nxd4 Qxe4 17.Qxe4 Nxe4 18.Nf5 Bc7 19.Bxh6 Rfd8 20.Bc4 Nxf2 21.Rxd7 Rxd7 22.Nc5 Rad8 23.Be3 Nd3+ 24.Bxd3 Rxd3 25.Nxb7 Re8 26.Kc2 Rd5 27.Bf2 Rxe1 28.Bxe1 ]>

15.d5 Nb6

<[15...c4 16.Bxc4 Rc8 17.Be3 Ba6 18.b3 Bxc4 19.bxc4 Nc5 20.Nxc5 Bxc5 21.Bxc5 Rxc5 22.Nd2 Qc7 23.Kb1 Nd7 24.Rhg1 Nb6 25.Qb3 a5 26.g5 h5 27.g6 f6 28.Rc1 ]>

16.Bb5+ Kf8 17.Be3 [17.g5 hxg5 18.Bxg5 c4 19.Nxb6 axb6 20.Qxc4 Rc8 21.Bc6 Qe8 22.Kb1 Bxc6 23.dxc6 Rxc6 24.Qd3 ]

17...Rc8

<[17...Nxa4 18.Bxa4 c4 19.Qxc4 Rc8 20.Bc6 Qe8 21.Bc5 Bxc5 22.Qxc5+ Kg8 23.Kb1 Rxc6 24.dxc6 Qxc6 25.Rd8+ Kh7 26.Rxh8+ Kxh8 27.Qf8+ Kh7 28.Re1 ]>

18.Nd2 Nfd7 White now has a sizeable advantage.

19.Kb1

<[19.Nxb6 Nxb6 20.Nc4 Rc7 21.Kb1 Kg8 22.Nxd6 Qxd6 23.Rhf1 c4 24.f4 is also very good for White and may be better than the text move.]>

19...g6 Playing ...c4 may have been better.

<[19...c4 20.Nxc4 Nxc4 21.Bxc4 Ba6 22.b3 Bxc4 23.bxc4 Nc5 24.Nxc5 Bxc5 25.Bxc5 Qxc5 26.d6 Qxc4 27.Qxc4 Rxc4 28.Rc1 Rc3 29.Rxc3 bxc3 30.Rc1 g6 31.Rxc3 Kg7 32.f4 exf4 33.e5 Rd8 34.Rd3 Kf8 35.Kc2 g5 36.Rd4 Ke8 37.Kd3 Kd7 38.Ke4 ]>

20.Rc1 Kg7 21.Qd3

<[21.Nxb6 Nxb6 22.Nc4 Nxc4 23.Qxc4 a6 24.Ba4 a5 25.h4 ]>

21...Rc7 22.Rc2 Nxa4 23.Bxa4 Nb6 24.Bb5 Rhc8 25.h4 Ra8 26.Ba6 c4 27.Bxc4 Nxc4 28.Nxc4 Ba6 29.g5 h5 30.Rhc1 Rac8 31.Qb3 Bb5 32.a4 Bxc4 33.Rxc4 Qd7 34.Rxc7 Rxc7 35.Rxc7 Qxc7 36.Qc2 Qa5?!

<[36...f6 37.Qxc7+ Bxc7 38.Bxa7 fxg5 39.hxg5 h4 40.f3 h3 41.Bg1 b3 42.Bh2 Kf7 43.Kc1 ]>

37.b3 a6 38.Qc6 Qc7 39.Qxc7 <[39.Qxa6 may be better.]> 39...Bxc7 40.Kc2 Bd8 41.f4 exf4 42.Bxf4 f6 43.gxf6+ Bxf6 44.Bg3 g5 45.e5 Bd8 46.hxg5 Bxg5 47.Kd3 1–0

Aug-19-08  Boomie: Here's my first swing at 7...h6 in the g4 Semi-Slav. Black ends with about a half pawn edge on the Rybka scale. I'm looking for white improvements. Since all these g4 lines lead to open, tactical positions, I wonder how wise it would be for GMAN to use it against us. Doesn't it negate his advantage in positional understanding?

1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 e6 5. e3 Nbd7 6. Qc2 Bd6 7. g4 h6 8. Bd2 dxc4 9. Bxc4 b5 10. Be2 Bb7 11. Rg1 Rc8 12. e4 b4 13. e5 bxc3 14. bxc3 c5 15. exd6 Bxf3 16. Bxf3 cxd4 17. Qb3 d3 18. g5 hxg5 19. Rxg5 Kf8


click for larger view

Aug-19-08  Boomie: <whatthefat: <Boomie: To create that line, I followed the Rybka opening book, which uses mostly engine games and some super GM games. No specific games were used.> Interesting. It's a frightening line alright. Just wondering, what if White tries 10.h4 straight away?> I'm glad you asked that question because one line leads to the following delightful position. I don't remember ever seeing all the knights in the center like this. What a hoot! Rybka sez it's even here but who knows?

1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 e6 5. e3 Nbd7 6. Qc2 Bd6 7. g4 dxc4 8. Bxc4 O-O 9. g5 Nd5 10. h4 e5 11. Ne4 Bb4+ 12. Bd2 exd4 13. Nxd4 Ne5


click for larger view

Aug-19-08  Boomie: Here's another amusing position from the g4 Slav. This follows an improvement for white 17. Bb7 which seems to equalize. These problem like position appear a lot in this variation. Who said the Queen's Gambit was boring?

1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 e6 5. e3 Nbd7 6. Qc2 Bd6 7. g4 h6 8. Bd2 dxc4 9. Bxc4 b5 10. Be2 Bb7 11. Rg1 Rc8 12. e4 b4 13. e5 bxc3 14. bxc3 c5 15. exd6 Bxf3 16. Bxf3 cxd4 17. Bb7 Rc4 18. Qb3 Nb6 19. cxd4 Qxd6 20. Rc1 Qxh2 21. Qb5+ Kd8 22. Rg3 Rxc1+ 23. Bxc1 Nfd5 24. Qc5 Qh1+ 25. Kd2 Qf1 26. Qd6+ Nd7 27. Bxd5 Qxf2+ 28. Kd3 exd5 29. Bd2


click for larger view

Aug-19-08  Boomie: <imag: We can also take the pawn. Is 7...Nxg4 considered unsound?> Nxg4 isn't bad but the other variations lead to greater complexity and are therefore better for us. For example:

1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 e6 5. e3 Nbd7 6. Qc2 Bd6 7. g4 Nxg4 8. Rg1 h5 9. h3 Qf6 10. Be2 Nh2 11. Ng5 Ng4 12. f4 Nh6


click for larger view

Aug-19-08  Boomie: imag wrote:

I was actually thinking about:

1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 e6 4.e3 Nf6 5.Nf3 Nbd7 6.Qc2 Bd6 7.g4 Nxg4 8.Rg1 <Nxh2> 9.Nxh2 Bxh2 10.Rxg7 Nf8 11.Rg2 Bc7 12.e4

and here <12...Ng6>

Aug-19-08  Boomie: <imag: I was actually thinking about: 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 e6 4.e3 Nf6 5.Nf3 Nbd7 6.Qc2 Bd6 7.g4 Nxg4 8.Rg1 <Nxh2> 9.Nxh2 Bxh2 10.Rxg7 Nf8 11.Rg2 Bc7 12.e4>

Looks like 10...h5 may be better than Nf8. This line is worth persuing but I've run out of gas as it's 4:30 AM here.

Aug-19-08  dotsamoht: Using the CG database and Shredder as a guide, I verify the line

1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 e6 5. e3 Nbd7 6. Qc2 Bd6 7. g4 h6 8. Bd2 dxc4 9. Bxc4 b5 10. Be2 Bb7 11. e4

But now Shredder prefers 11... e5 over both popular Black replies, 11... Be7 and 11... b4 and I don't know what to think of it. It looks so logical, it must have been tried, but I don't see it in the database.

Shredder continues after 11... e5 12. Nxe5 Nxe5 13. dxe5 Bxe514. OOO Qc7 with White ahead.

Aug-20-08  Boomie: 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 e6 5. e3 Nbd7 6. Qc2 Bd6 7. g4 h6

<h6 and dxc4 both lead to dynamic equality. Both lines are fiendishly complex and should suit our analytical advantage. The 7. g4 lines are pure tactics. GMAN's superiority in positional judgement is negated. Therefore I think it would be very unwise for him to choose this variation.>

(7...dxc4 8. Bxc4 e5

(8...O-O 9. g5 Nd5 10. Bd2

(10. h4 e5 11. Ne4 Bb4+ 12. Bd2 exd4 13. Nxd4 Ne5 0.00/17)

10...f5 11. gxf6 N7xf6 12. Rg1 Qc7 13. O-O-O b5 14. Be2 a5 15. h4 a4 16. Kb1 Kh8 17. e4 b4

(17...Nxc3+ 18. bxc3 e5

(18...Bf4 19. e5 Nd5 20. Bxf4 Rxf4 21. Ng5 Rf5 22. Bd3 0.58/17)

19. Rg5 Bg4 20. dxe5 Bxe5 21. Nxe5 Bxe2 22. Rdg1

(22. Re1 Bh5 23. Reg1 Rae8 24. f4 Rg8 0.58/17)

22...Rae8 23. Bf4 Bf3 1.03/19)

18. Nxa4 Nxe4 19. Qxe4 Rxa4 20. Rc1 Qa7 0.15/17)

9. g5 Nd5 10. Bd2 O-O 11. Nxd5 cxd5 12. Bxd5 exd4 13. O-O-O Nb6 14. Be4 Bg4 15. Nxd4 Bxd1 16. Rxd1 Rc8 17. Bc3 Qxg5 18. Bxh7+ Kh8 19. Bf5 Rc5 0.00/17)

<Why not take the pawn asked imag. Why not indeed? The results are slightly worse but not enough to be significant. The best argument against taking is that's what white wants. White gets an enduring initiative and usually regains the pawn. So what's the point of taking?>

(7...Nxg4 8. Rg1 h5

(8...Nxh2 9. Nxh2 Bxh2 10. Rxg7 h5 11. cxd5 cxd5 12. Bd2 Nf6 13. f4 h4

(13...Bd7 14. Rg2

(14. O-O-O h4

(14...Rc8 15. Rg2 Ng4 16. Qb3 Bc6 17. Kb1 a6 18. Na4 0.67/19)

15. Nb5 Bxb5 16. Bxb5+ Kf8 17. Rg5 Qe7

(17...a5 18. Qc5+ Qe7 19. Rh1 Ne4

(19...Qxc5+ 20. dxc5 Ne4 21. Rxh2 Nxg5 22. fxg5 Rc8 23. b4 axb4 24. Bxb4 Kg8 25. Kc2 Rh5 26. a4 Kh7 1.22/21)

20. Qxe7+ Kxe7 21. Rxh2 Nxg5 22. fxg5 h3 0.59/22)

18. Rh1 Ne4 19. Rxh2 Nxg5 20. fxg5 Kg7 0.45/19)

14...Ng4 15. O-O-O 0.59/20)

14. O-O-O Bd7 15. Nb5 Bxb5 16. Bxb5+ Kf8 17. Rg5 a5 18. Qc5+ Qe7 19. Rh1 Qxc5+ 20. dxc5 Ne4 21. Rxh2 Nxg5 22. fxg5 Rc8 23. b4 axb4 24. Bxb4 Kg8 0.59/21)

9. h3 Qf6 10. hxg4

(10. Be2 Nh2 11. Ng5 Ng4 12. f4 Nh6 0.08/17)

10...Qxf3 11. Be2 Qh3 12. gxh5 Kf8 13. Bd2 Nf6 14. O-O-O Qf5 15. Qxf5 exf5 16. cxd5 Nxd5 17. Nxd5 cxd5 0.13/17)

8. Bd2

(8. Rg1 e5 9. cxd5 cxd5 10. Nb5 Bb8 11. Bd2 e4 12. g5 exf3 13. gxf6 Nxf6 -0.04/17)

8...dxc4

(8...Qe7 9. h3 dxc4 10. Bxc4 b5 11. Be2 Bb7 12. e4 0.32/18)

9. Bxc4 b5 10. Be2 Bb7 11. Rg1 Rc8 12. e4 b4 13. e5 bxc3 14. bxc3 c5 15. exd6 Bxf3 16. Bxf3 cxd4 17. Bb7

(17. Qb3 d3

(17...dxc3 18. Bxc3 O-O 0.00/18)

18. g5 hxg5 19. Rxg5 Kf8 -0.51/17)

(17. Rd1 O-O 18. g5 hxg5 19. Rxg5 -0.38/17)

17...Rc4 18. Qb3 Nb6 19. cxd4 Qxd6 20. Rc1 Qxh2 21. Qb5+ Kd8 22. Rg3 Rxc1+ 23. Bxc1 Nfd5 24. Qc5 Qh1+ 25. Kd2 Qf1 26. Qd6+ Nd7 27. Bxd5 Qxf2+ 28. Kd3 exd5 29. Bd2 0.00/17

Aug-20-08  Boomie: Moro played 7. g4 Semi-Slav against Kramnik today...heh. Morozevich vs Kramnik, 2008
Aug-21-08  dotsamoht: I think our Semi-Slav options are:

1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 e6 5. e3 Nbd7 with two options:

6. Bd3 dxc4 7. Bxc4 b5

and

6. Qc2 Bd6 with five possibilities:

7. Bd3
7. Be2
7. b3
7. Bd2
7. g4

This last choice is the Shabalov.

In the Shabalov, we have as choices:

7... dxc4
7... h6
7... Bb4
7... Nxg4

Since Kramnik just went down in flames with 7... Nxg4, perhaps we want to stay away from that one.

I think 7... dxc4 makes sense here and it is the most popular. 7... h6 is interesting and is the line I have been looking at. My roadblock is that Shredder keeps wanting to play ...Nxg4, which I do not think suits this line.

I hope this helps to organize our thoughts on this line.

Aug-22-08  truefriends: Re-post from the mainpage:

< truefriends: How about letting GMAN play against his own moves? Just try to copy one of his games with black. Once he realises this he will try to deviate and play a minor move. And then we start deep sliding forward analysis and smash him like a bug ;-) >

Aug-23-08  DPLeo: Here's a link to some King's Indian examples I posted on the main page.

A Nickel vs The World, 2008

With the King's Indian, no matter what he opens with we may be able to force the position we want, which allows us to control the game even though we have black.

Aug-23-08  Hugin:

B97: Sicilian Najdorf: Poisoned Pawn 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4 Qb6 8.Qd2 Qxb2 9.Rb1 Qa3 10.e5 dxe5 11.fxe5 h6** 12.Bh4 Nfd7 13.Ne4 Qxa2 14.Rd1 Qd5 15.Qe3 Qxe5 16.Be2 Bc5 17.Bg3 Bxd4 18.Rxd4 Qa5+ 19.Rd2 0-0 20.Bd6 Rd8

[20...Re8 21.0-0 Nc6 22.Qg3 Qb6+ 23.Kh1 Ne7 24.Be5 Ng6 25.Bc3 Re7 26.h4 Ndf8 27.h5 Qc7 28.hxg6 Qxg3 29.Nxg3 Nxg6 30.Rd8+ Kh7 31.Bxg7 b6 32.Nh5 Bb7 33.Rd6 Be4 34.Bb2 Bxc2 35.Rc1 Bf5 36.Bf3 Rf8 37.g4 Bxg4 38.Bxg4 e5 39.Rxb6 Rg8 40.Rg1 Rge8 41.Nf6+ Kg7 42.Nxe8+ Rxe8 43.Bh5 Re7 44.Bxg6 fxg6 45.Rgxg6+ Kh7 46.Rxh6+ Kg7 47.Rbg6+ Kf7 48.Rxa6 Kg8 49.Rag6+ Kf7 50.Rh7+ Ke8 51.Rxe7+ Kxe7 52.Bxe5 Kf7 53.Rd6 Ke7 54.Kg2 Ke8 55.Kf3 Ke7 56.Ke4 Ke8 57.Kf5 Ke7 58.Kg6 Ke8 59.Bf6 Kf8 60.Rd8#]

21.Qg3

[21...Nc6 22.Bc7 Qa1+ 23.Rd1 Qa4 24.Qh4 Qb4+ 25.c3 Qf8 26.0-0 Re8 27.Bd6 Re7 28.Bc4 Nde5 29.Bb3 Ng6 30.Qg3 b5 31.h4 Qd8 32.h5 Nf8 33.Bc5 Bd7 34.Nf6+ Kh8 35.Bc2 a5 36.Nxd7 Nxd7 37.Qd3 f5 38.Bxe7 Nxe7 39.Qxd7 Qxd7 40.Rxd7]

22.Be5 Qg6 23.Qh4 Nc6

[23...Rf8 24.Bd6 Nc6 25.Bxf8 Nxf8 26.0-0]

24.Bh5 Qf5

[24...Qxe4+ 25.Qxe4 Ncxe5 26.0-0]


click for larger view

25.Bxg7!! devostating combination.. Nc5 26.Nxc5 Kxg7

[26...Rxd2 27.Rf1 Qg5 28.Qxg5 hxg5 29.Rxf7 Rd5 30.Ne4 Rf5 31.Nf6+ Rxf6 32.Bxf6]

27.Rf1 Qe5+ 28.Ne4 Qa1+ 29.Rd1 Rxd1+ 30.Bxd1 Qe5

[30...Qd4 31.c3 Qe5 32.Rf6 Qxe4+ 33.Qxe4 Kxf6 34.Qh4+ Kg7 35.Qg3+ Kf6 36.Bh5 Ke7 37.Qc7+ Bd7 38.Qxb7 Rg8 39.Bf3 Rb8 40.Qxa6]

31.Rf6 Bd7

[31...Qxe4+ 32.Qxe4 Kxf6 33.Qf4+ Ke7 34.Qc7+ Ke8 35.c4; 31...Ne7 32.Bh5 Ng6 33.Qg4 Qa1+ 34.Ke2 Qxf6 35.Nxf6 Kxf6 36.Qd4+]

32.Qxh6+ Kg8 33.Rf4 f5 34.Rh4 Rd8 35.Rh3 Qxe4+ 36.Kf1 Qe5 37.Rg3+ Qxg3 38.hxg3 1-0

White wins in all variations in 11..h6 variation 11..Nfd7 maybe better...

Aug-24-08  Boomie: 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. f3>

I wonder why most GMs have played 6. Be3 before f3. Is there a way to exploit f3?

While wandering through the RybkaII opening book, I stumbled on this little played line. 6...b5.


click for larger view

This opening book is taken from engine matches and super GM games. Although b5 was played only 5 times out of about 800, it had by far the best performance rating.

Rybka 3 suggests 7. Nd5, a move not played in the book. The game might continue 7...Nxd5 8. exd5 g6 9. a4 b4 10. Bc4 Qc7 11. Bb3 Bg7


click for larger view

White's Yugoslav plans have been thwarted. He will have to castle kingside. The pawn on f3 is now irrelevant. White will prepare f4 thereby losing a tempo. On the plus side for white, he has good play on the half-open e-file.

White can continue with the Yugoslav plan with 7. Be3. After 7...Bb7 8. Qd2 Nbd7 9. 0-0-0 e6, black hasn't created black square weaknesses with g6.

The point of this exercise is there must be an explanation for why most GMs play 6. Be3 instead of f3.

Aug-24-08  Boomie: Notice in the 6. f3 Najdorf, the OE shows 6...b5 has had by far the best results. Opening Explorer

The natural looking 7. Be3 has done miserably Opening Explorer. So bad in fact that 6...b5 could be called a trap since Be3 is such an automatic move for white against the Najdorf.

If the game follows the moves with the best results, 7. a4 b4 8. Nd5 Nxd5 9. exd5 Bb7 10. Nf5, Rybka 3 shows black with a slight edge.


click for larger view

White may also try 10. Bc4 Qc7 11. Bb3 g6 12. Bd2 Qc5=


click for larger view

So far I haven't found any way for white to take advantage of 6...b5.

Aug-24-08  Artar1: Najdorf Poison Pawn 9.Nb3 Variation

<1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4 Qb6 8.Qd2 Qxb2 9.Nb3 Qa3 10.Bxf6 gxf6 11.Be2 h5 12.0–0 Nd7 13.f5 Be7 14.Nb1 Qa4 15.c4>

[15.Nc3 is a Fritz TN that may be better than published theory. 15...Qc6 16.Nd4 Qc5 (Not 16...Qc7 17.fxe6 Nb6 18.Nd5 Nxd5 19.exd5 fxe6 20.dxe6 ) 17.Kh1 Ne5 18.Rab1 Unclear.]

<15...Qc6 16.Nc3 Ne5 17.Nd4 Qc7 18.Qd1 b5 19.fxe6 fxe6 20.Bxh5+ Kd8 21.Nce2>

[21.Be2 bxc4 ]

<21...Rxh5> (Instead of ...Qa7.) <22.Nf4 Qa7 23.Kh1>

[23.Nxh5 Nc6 24.Kh1 Qxd4 ]

<23...Rh7 24.cxb5 axb5 25.Nfxe6+ Bxe6 26.Nxe6+ Kd7 27.Qb3 Qa3 28.Nd4>

[28.Qd5?? Rxh2+ 29.Kxh2 Ng4+ 30.Kg1 Qe3+ 31.Rf2 Qxf2+ 32.Kh1 Rh8+ 33.Qh5 Rxh5#]

<28...Qxb3 29.axb3 Rxa1 30.Rxa1 >

Aug-24-08  Artar1: <Hugin: B97: Sicilian Najdorf: Poisoned Pawn White wins in all variations in 11..h6 variation 11..Nfd7 maybe better...>

The knight move is by far the most popular response for Black, with 12.Bc4 and 12.Ne4 the most popular White replies.

Aug-24-08  brankat: <Artar1> Sorry to interrupt. A quick question: What happened with Your forum? You can reply in my forum. Thank You.
Aug-25-08  Artar1: <Zappa (Computer) - Deep Sjeng (Computer) [D45]>

1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 c6 4.Nf3 Nf6 5.e3 Nbd7 6.Qc2 Bd6 7.g4 dxc4 8.Bxc4 e5 9.g5 Nd5 10.Ne4

<[10.Bd2 exd4 11.Nxd4 0–0 12.Nxd5 cxd5 13.Bd3 g6 14.h4 Nc5 15.f4 led to a loss for White in Radjabov-Shirov, 2004. White could try 15.Bc3 or 15.Rg1 instead.]>

10...Bc7 11.Bd2 0–0

<[11...exd4 12.Nxd4 Ne5 13.Be2 0–0 14.h4 is a Fritz TN. White's record in this variation is not good at the elite level. The idea for White would be to press the attack on the kingside as quickly as possible before Black can finish developing. 14...Re8 15.0–0–0 Bg4 16.f3 Bh5 17.Kb1 Qc8 18.Rdg1 White may have a very small edge.]>

12.0–0–0 exd4 13.Nxd4 Ne5 14.Be2 Re8

<[14...Ba5 15.Bxa5 Qxa5 16.a3 Bh3 17.Rhg1 Rad8 18.Rg3 Bc8 19.h4 Rfe8 ]>

15.Rdg1 a5 16.a3 Bh3 17.Rg3 Bc8 18.Rgg1 Ng6 19.h4 Bb6 20.h5 Ngf4 21.Bf1

<[21.Bc4 is worth a look. 21...Nh3 (21...Bxd4 22.exd4 Nh3 23.Rg2 Kh8 24.g6 ) 22.Rg2 Nhf4 23.Nxc6 bxc6 24.exf4 ]>

21...Bxd4 22.exd4 Qb6 23.Bxf4 Qxd4 24.Bd2 Nb4 25.Bxb4 axb4 26.Rh4 bxa3 27.bxa3

Fritz is having a difficult time evaluating this position.

27...Qa1+ 28.Qb1 Qxa3+ 29.Qb2 Bf5 30.Qxa3 Rxa3 31.Kb2 Rf3 32.Nd2 Rxf2 33.Rd4 Rh2 34.h6 gxh6 35.gxh6+ Kf8 36.Rg5 c5 37.Rd6 Ke7 38.Rd5 Be6 39.Rh5 Rf2 40.Rhe5 Ra8 41.Be2 b6 42.Re3 Rh2 43.Nf3 Rh3 44.Bd1 Rg8 45.Rd2 Rxh6 46.Ne5 Rh3 47.Nc6+ Kf8 48.Re5 Rgg3

It's difficult to watch two computers play an endgame.

49.Nd8 Bc4 50.Nc6 Ra3 51.Re8+ Kg7 52.Rg2+ Kh6 53.Reg8 Ra2+ 54.Kc1 Ra1+ 55.Kd2 Rd3+ 56.Kc2 Ra2+ 57.Kc1 Rxg2 58.Rxg2 Re3 59.Nb8 Be6 60.Rb2 Kg5 61.Rxb6 h5 62.Kd2 Re5 63.Bf3 Bg4 64.Nc6 Re6 65.Bh1 f5 66.Rb5 Re2+ 67.Kd3 Re1 68.Bg2 Rc1 69.Ne5 Kf4 70.Nc4 Kg3 71.Bd5 Rd1+ 72.Nd2 h4 73.Rxc5 h3 74.Rc7 h2 75.Rh7 Bh3 76.Rg7+ Kf2 77.Rh7 h1Q 78.Bxh1 Rxh1 79.Kc3 Rc1+ 80.Kd4 Bg4 81.Nc4 Rd1+ 82.Ke5 Re1+ 83.Kf6 Rc1 84.Ne5 Kg1 85.Rg7 Rf1 86.Rg8 Kh2 87.Rh8+ Kg3 ½–½

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 200)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 62 OF 200 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC