ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 328 OF 1118 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Jan-15-10 | | whatthefat: I see, but if they have accessed the internet using your computer since then wouldn't they be using a different IP address? |
|
| Jan-15-10 | | chessmoron: Touche. |
|
Jan-15-10
 | | Annie K.: <laskersteinitz> Thanks for the pleasant disposition. After all, what you ask from the administrators is none of my business. :) |
|
| Jan-15-10 | | whatthefat: <chessmoron>
I'm not saying it's hopeless - there may still be a clever way to catch them out. I'm just not tech. clever enough to know. |
|
| Jan-15-10 | | notyetagm: <CG.COM> How about a forum for the <2009 Brazilian Championship>? Thanks
http://www.fpx.com.br/2009/bra2009/... |
|
| Jan-16-10 | | Benzol: <chessgames> I've just submitted a game played at Ashburton in the 1989 South Island Championship between David Weegenaar and Chris Baker. However, I think I've got the players reversed for colours. It should have Baker with the White pieces and Weegenaar with the Black ones. Weegenaar was the winner. Can you fix this please if I've made a mistake. Thanks in advance. |
|
| Jan-16-10 | | obientag: can we request if chessgames.com could include <wesley>'s games in the live feed? thanks |
|
Jan-16-10
 | | Tabanus: Hi again <cg>, the Seville Open ended today. The winner was (now Tabanus-bioed) GM Renier Vazquez Igarza, aka Renier Vazquez |
|
| Jan-17-10 | | notyetagm: <CG.COM> How about a forum for the <2009 Polish Championship>? http://www.mp2010.pl/m/index.html
Thanks |
|
| Jan-18-10 | | turbo231: I want to see naka vs kram tomorrow, where do i go to vote? |
|
| Jan-18-10 | | Red October: cg.com is my homepage, so i guess if someone stole my puter he would have to log in here unless he changed it offline... |
|
| Jan-19-10 | | waddayaplay: Chessgames, a different question.
Sometimes I send in corrections about alternative game score. Are the alternative games deleted? Sometimes there is an alternative game score and I find that the duplicate game exists in the database, and sometimes there is an alternative game score but no duplicate game existing. So I wonder if games are intentionally kept in the database even if they are duplicated? |
|
Jan-19-10
 | | kingscrusher: Hi Chessgames.com
Whilst the starting point of the World championship matches is very good documentation (and thanks for the footer section link), I think a really important *motive* of trying to trace the history of the World championship matches in terms of the Evolution of chess style deserves to be addressed far more strongly. In addressing this, and tracing how chess style evolved through the World championship matches, I think this will bring the matches into much higher profile, as people will then understand things more like decisions in the Steinitz vs Chigorin match. I am doing a video series on the Evolution of Chess Style, and have just posted some comments on the Steinitz Chigorin match. Quite frankly, I am astounded that Chigorin is not even mentioned as the father of the Soviet Chess School. Well at least by the Kibitzers. Do people even realise that the battle between Karpov and Kasparov was an ideological battle between Karpov the extender of the accumulation of small advantages model brought by Steinitz, and Kasparov, the Dynamist, who's earliest predessor is Chigorin?! Is the evolution of chess style just of theoretical importance and Chessgames.com is just set to be a "Nice games database" with commentary, or would you like to try and emphasise style evolution through these matches?! One of my favourite books "The World of Chess" by Saidy and Lessing not only takes a historical perspective as you have done, but does extend that into ideological insights for chess style evolution. Anyway, please check out my video series so far on the evolution of Chess style, and feel free to use any ideas contained in there if you want. I think such a tracing of style evolution would be of practical interest to Chessgames.com readers. http://www.youtube.com/user/kingscr... |
|
Jan-19-10
 | | chessgames.com: <waddayaplay: Chessgames, a different question. Sometimes I send in corrections about alternative game score. Are the alternative games deleted?> Yes, but there is a mechanism that stores "bad scores" in a special archive, so we can refer to the version of the game deemed incorrect. This comes in handy during those times when we think that a mistake has been made, or for research purposes. This feature is mostly for admins but you can see a peek at it where you see <NOTE: There
are two scores for this game in the database. <View alternate score>> <Sometimes there is an alternative game score and I find that the duplicate game exists in the database> That happens a lot when there are two versions of a game floating around the internet. Perhaps an example is in order: 1. Suppose A and A' are similar versions of the same game. We get both and they show up separately in our database. 2. Then we get a correction on game A' saying "This is the same thing as A". Usually they are technically incorrect, because there almost always is some small difference, but we know what they mean. 3. Now we do a process we call "merging the games". This puts A' in the special backup archive, moves all kibitzing and game collections from A' over to A, and then finally in the end we delete A'. 4. Later on some helpful user submits a file of 200 historical games including a new copy of A'. Suddenly the wrong score is back in our database again as a separate entry. Now we have the situation you describe: there is a game with an alternate score, and then there is another game in the database that looks like that alternate score. <So I wonder if games are intentionally kept in the database even if they are duplicated?> Not on purpose. If you see an alternate score as well as a duplicate game, it's probably because of step 4 above. But there are other possibilities; for example, sometimes we find that when we fixed the duplicate there weren't two of them--but actually thee of them! I hope that explains it clearly enough. |
|
Jan-19-10
 | | chessgames.com: <kingscrusher> Excellent video series, as usual. |
|
| Jan-19-10 | | A.G. Argent: <kingscrusher...excellent video series...> Absolutely. First rate. |
|
| Jan-19-10 | | suenteus po 147: I have a problem: I just switched over to Firefox and I love everything about it except for one thing, every time I open a game page from this website (or most things that run java) I get a pop-up notice that says "This runs on an older version of Java. Do you wish to continue?" I have to click run (or cancel) each time, and it's driving me insane! What can I do to blanket permit all older versions of Java to run without hitting the "Run" button every time? Anyone with a working answer gets their tournament of choice collected next just for you :) |
|
Jan-19-10
 | | chessgames.com: <This runs on an older version of Java. Do you wish to continue?> We have never heard of that one, but perhaps somebody else here recognizes it and can chime in. Have you tried just updating your Java again at http://www.java.com/? That often solves Java related issues, especially after installing a new browser. |
|
| Jan-19-10 | | suenteus po 147: <chessgames.com> Thank you. After uninstalling Java and all updates and then reinstalling it seems to work normally now in Firefox. Don't know why it worked, but glad it did. Which chess tournament (historical or contemporary) would you like me to collect next? |
|
| Jan-20-10 | | waddayaplay: <re: explanation> Thank you, very good explanation. I will continue to send in correction slips then, even if there is already an alternative score that seems to match the duplicate game. |
|
Jan-20-10
 | | chessgames.com: <Don't know why it worked, but glad it did.> Remember that Java installations search for browsers on your system and does something to them. (I am not a Java expert so "does something" is about all I can offer on that process.) The point being, the chronology of your installations can make a difference--it's possible to install all the right things, but in the wrong order, and have it fail to work. Ain't modern computers wonderful? <Which chess tournament (historical or contemporary) would you like me to collect next?> I'd suggest one of the old Hastings tournaments but so many of them are already in Game Collection Search, so be sure not to re-invent the wheel. |
|
Jan-20-10
 | | chessgames.com: <<Which chess tournament (historical or contemporary)> Actually now that we think about it, the most important tournaments to have for our immediate purposes are the "pre-official" world championships, such as McDonnell vs LaBourdonnais and Morphy vs Anderssen. We plan on linking these into the History of the World Chess Championship feature as a sort of a prefix. But again, chances are almost certain that such collections already exist, so it's probably nothing you need to do. |
|
| Jan-20-10 | | suenteus po 147: <chessgames.com> The matches you refer to have already been collected. See here: Game Collection: WCC Index Also, <Phony Benoni> and I, as well as others, have collected a lot of the early Hastings tournaments: Game Collection: Hastings Christmas Congress (Tournament Index) |
|
Jan-22-10
 | | juan31: Chessgames.com: qué tengo que hacer para volver a jugar “Guess the Move” ya que casi completo los 6061 juegos y me gustaría volver a jugar de nuevo ya que es una de las funciones de Chessgames.com más importantes para mi. Gracias por su respuesta. |
|
Jan-23-10
 | | chessgames.com: <Juan31> usted puede proponer nuevos juegos para "guess the move" en esta pagina Guess-the-Move Suggestion Queue : Simplemente pon el numero del juego donde dice "Enter URL". El numero del juego se encuentra adentro de la direcciones que aparecen en la parte ariba de tu navegador. |
|
 |
 |
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 328 OF 1118 ·
Later Kibitzing> |