chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

Domdaniel
Member since Aug-11-06 · Last seen Jan-10-19
no bio
>> Click here to see domdaniel's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   Domdaniel has kibitzed 30777 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jan-08-19 Domdaniel chessforum (replies)
 
Domdaniel: Blank Reg: "They said there was no future - well, this is it."
 
   Jan-06-19 Kibitzer's Café (replies)
 
Domdaniel: Haaarry Neeeeds a Brutish Empire... https://youtu.be/ZioiHctAnac
 
   Jan-06-19 G McCarthy vs M Kennefick, 1977 (replies)
 
Domdaniel: Maurice Kennefick died over the new year, 2018-2019. RIP. It was many years since I spoke to him. He gave up chess, I reckon, towards the end of the 80s, though even after that he was sometimes lured out for club games. I still regard this game, even after so many years, as the ...
 
   Jan-06-19 Maurice Kennefick (replies)
 
Domdaniel: Kennefick died over the 2018-19 New Year. Formerly one of the strongest players in Ireland, he was the first winner of the Mulcahy tournament, held in honour of E.N. Mulcahy, a former Irish champion who died in a plane crash. I played Kennefick just once, and had a freakish win, ...
 
   Jan-06-19 Anand vs J Fedorowicz, 1990 (replies)
 
Domdaniel: <NBZ> -- Thanks, NBZ. Enjoy your chortle. Apropos nothing in particular, did you know that the word 'chortle' was coined by Lewis Carroll, author of 'Alice in Wonderland'? I once edited a magazine called Alice, so I can claim a connection. 'Chortle' requires the jamming ...
 
   Jan-06-19 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
Domdaniel: <al wazir> - It's not easy to go back through past Holiday Present Hunts and discover useful information. Very few people have played regularly over the years -- even the players who are acknowledged as best, <SwitchingQuylthulg> and <MostlyAverageJoe> have now ...
 
   Jan-05-19 Wesley So (replies)
 
Domdaniel: Wesley is a man of his word. Once again, I am impressed by his willingness to stick to commitments.
 
   Jan-04-19 G Neave vs B Sadiku, 2013 (replies)
 
Domdaniel: Moral: if you haven't encountered it before, take it seriously. Remember Miles beating Karpov with 1...a6 at Skara. Many so-called 'irregular' openings are quite playable.
 
   Dec-30-18 Robert Enders vs S H Langer, 1968
 
Domdaniel: <HMM> - Heh, well, yes. I also remembered that Chuck Berry had a hit with 'My Ding-a-ling' in the 1970s. I'm not sure which is saddest -- that the author of Johnny B. Goode and Memphis Tennessee and Teenage Wedding - among other short masterpieces - should sink to such ...
 
   Dec-30-18 T Gelashvili vs T Khmiadashvili, 2001 (replies)
 
Domdaniel: This is the game I mean: Bogoljubov vs Alekhine, 1922
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Frogspawn: Levity's Rainbow

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 462 OF 963 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-23-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: Two posts after this one, I'll hit <Repunit 5> = 11111.

Fascinating number.

Jan-23-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: No, it isn't.

Also, how could you turn away from <Mangled Corpse> v. <Surrogate Crayfish>?

I was proud of the <big baby> for missing the irritatingly accurate Winning line that Computer head kept posting incessantly like some kind of King Nerd modern day Medieval herald.

Did you know that 11111 is both a whole number and a prime of it's own integer?

It's also its own uncle, according to the <Kabballah>.

I suppose that is pretty fascinating.

A chess game like tonight would mesmerize a mongoose.

I actually tried to win with the first three moves of the winning computer line on the <Little Chess Partner on the Prairie> "analyse this game" feature and failed miserably.

You just can't play chess quickly and win.

I can't anyways.

Jan-23-09  achieve: <Jess> Spot on. I am about to get decidedly sick. These comments drive me up the wall for some reason.

<Dom> Not you, insightful comments all the way...

Bu8t it was clear as a bell that the freeing of the g-file was perfect, with the pawns on g4 and g5 superior to Black's, even in a pieceless endgame....

I DO NOT understand many of the computer induced comments, including of some of my 'friends' ...

I can't anyways, too.

Jan-23-09  achieve: pawns on <h4 and h5>

sigh

Jan-23-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: todays word is <iconoclast> can you say <iconoclast> ?
Jan-23-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willia...
Jan-23-09  hms123: <OD> Interesting article. I am reminded of the Sociologist who went into the backwoods of Tennessee and asked an old farmer if he believed in baptism. The farmer replied, "Believe in it? Hell, I've seen it done!"
Jan-23-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I've read that 3 times <hms> and it's still not clicking.
Jan-23-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Elvis>

Howard means that the farmer "has seen" the <actual religious conversion occur> in a baptism.

IE- it's not just a matter of faith, he didn't just "see" the ceremony- he saw the actual Holy Rebirth, as if he was witnessing the face of God or the real ressurection or something.

The real point is it's a pretty funny joke- and it doens't actually ridicule the farmer in the joke. His faith is strong and his humorous stubborness and "plain speaking" matter of factness show him well in the anecdote.

Also, shows the very strong faith of backwoods Tennesse Players.

Jan-24-09  Boomie: <ODie: Brann the iconoclast>

"I have nothing against the Baptists. I just believe they were not held under long enough"

I'm still laughing. Thanks for the Wikipoop link.

Jan-24-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: Brann was a real man, carried a gun, used it too, oh to be in that day and age... would need to be barefoot and pregnant though... were women allowed to play chess then ?
Jan-24-09  Boomie: <Open Defence: Brann was a real man, carried a gun, used it too, oh to be in that day and age... would need to be barefoot and pregnant though... were women allowed to play chess then ?>

Yes but they weren't allowed to play gambits. They could pack heat however. In fact the best shot in the world was a woman, called "Little Sure Shot" by Sitting Bull.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annie_...

Jan-24-09  crawfb5: <Open Defence: Brann was a real man, carried a gun, used it too, oh to be in that day and age... would need to be barefoot and pregnant though... were women allowed to play chess then ?>

Mary Rudge won the first international women's tournament in London 1897 with the incredible score of +18 -0 =1!

http://www.johnrichards.pwp.blueyon...

<Boomie: <ODie: Brann the iconoclast>

"I have nothing against the Baptists. I just believe they were not held under long enough">

As a lapsed baptist, I can reveal to you they are not allowed to engage in sex standing up. It might lead to dancing. :-)

Jan-24-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: <crawfb5> ! I really like the picture of your dog!

nice fact on Mary Rudge...

take that Aronian!!

Jan-24-09  crawfb5: <Open Defence: <crawfb5> ! I really like the picture of your dog!>

Thanks. She often assumes that "Nipper" (the dog in the RCA ads) pose with her head slightly cocked to one side, especially when I make goofy noises playing with her. If she could raise one eyebrow, she probably would. :-) With the small avatars we are allowed here, I had to chose between her (Talia) and her sister (Lyta). I thought she might show up better in a tiny picture, as she has more contrast in her fur. Her sister insists she can be seen in the "pets" section of:

http://www.photo.net/photos/crawf

<nice fact on Mary Rudge... >

Of course as Richards points out toward the end of his article on Rudge, when Vera Menchik won the first official women's WC title in 1927, her tournament score was almost as impressive: +10 -0 =1. We can't really fault Vera for not having as many rounds to run up the score! :-)

Jan-24-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <Jess> R5 = 11111 is not prime. It factors into 41 x 271.

Sadly, the fact that 271 is not a prime of the form 4n+1 prevents 11111 from being a sum of two squares.

D'you recall a hard-boiled literary line - I think it was Hemingway or Mailer reworked by Burroughs - which went something like "The hole made by the bullet was so big that you could have put your fist in it, if it was a small fist and you really wanted to" ...?

That's mangled. Perhaps some hardboiled literary type -- the kind who reads pulp novels while relaxing in a radox bath at 100 degrees centigrade, or sometimes 212 Fahrenheit just for a change of routine - will correct me.

Also, paper does *not* ignite at 451 degrees Fahrenheit.

But I digress. The topic is the number 11111 (aka repunit #5): each repunit is simply a string of ones, and they're numbered accordingly. If I recollect rightly there are no repunit primes between R2 = 11 and R19 = 1,111,111,111,111,111,111. Which I think is prime.

But - speaking as we were of things one might do, with only moderate difficulty, if one really wanted to. Imagine that you have a really long number with thousands of digits and you want to know whether 41 divides evenly into it, without remainder.

You could divide it by 41. That'd work. So would this ...

First, group the long number in clumps of FIVE digits (because 41 divides R5). Thus, if our long number ('L') ends with 4555666123456789066606660 ... we rewrite that as 45556,66123,45678,90666,06660.

Then we add and subtract chunks alternately:

45556 + 66123 - 45678 + 90666 - 06660

And we divide the result by 41. If it comes out even, so will L. If not, not.

A useful thing to know, no? If you *really* want to put your fist into 11111 ...

Ahhhhhhh ... dawn is nearly here ... I need my night's blood ... numbers, numbers, ahhhh more, MORE ....

Jan-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: Right, fill up and move on ...

<As a lapsed baptist, I can reveal to you they are not allowed to engage in sex standing up. It might lead to dancing. :-)>

Heh. In the <Great Age of Euphemism> -- that's old-style euphemism, not political correctitude -- there was a sin/ error/ phenomenon known as "company keeping". Clerical and so-called laypersons were united in the belief that it was *a bad thing*.

It's possible that <company keeping> could lead to dancing. Just think of *The Company of Wolves* and *Dancing With Wolves*.

I can't comment on the non-lupine vertical expression of horizontal desires.

Quand on parle du loup, on en voit la queue.

Jan-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: chess can lead to mating, no wonder its banned in some cultures,

especially since mating with a lone Bishop was thought to be impossible

Jan-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: * Quack *
Jan-25-09  crawfb5: <It's possible that <company keeping> could lead to dancing. Just think of *The Company of Wolves* and *Dancing With Wolves*.>

Well, we <are> known by the company we keep. That's how we got Wolverine? :-)

I was raised by wolves. That may be why I got a shot of an open-mouthed timber wolf inches away from my hand with only the enclosure glass between us. Either that, or it was my animal magnetism. :-)

Jan-25-09  everyone else: Well I suppose you've all forgotten about <me>, now.

Ignore me at your peril.

Jan-26-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <everyone else> Au contraire, my paradoxical pal: you are never far from my thoughts.

However, I'm not sure how distance is measured in the thought-sphere.

<at your peril> is a delightful phrase. Your peril or mine? Mein kampf or yours?

Names like yours, incidentally, are ripe material for Zeno-like (Zeno of Elea, not the other one) paradoxes: Russell's paradox, the Barber of Seville paradox, the Epimenides con, usw.

Epimenides the Cretan said "all Cretans are liars". The Barber of Seville shaves everyone in Seville who does not shave themselves ... who shaves the barber?

And who shaves <everyone else>?

It's an important question. I want to be shaved on the Day of Judgement.

Shaving's behaving.

Jan-26-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: Mating with a lone Bishop may be impossible, but mating with multiple Bishops is heretical.

Except for <actresses>, who have a special licence, a papal bull, and an imprimatur tattooed in Braille.

Jan-26-09  crawfb5: <Bad Bishops> are to be avoided.

A <papal bull>...is that what one rides at a Catholic rodeo?

I tried to go to one, but I was suffering from <inertial mass>.

Jan-26-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <crawfb5> Catholic rodeo, yeah, sounds plausible ... cowpunchers in black frocks ... BOORS (Bishops On Opposite Rawhide Saddles) and BOOM (Bishops Of Opposite Manliness) and even some BOOKENDS (Bishops Opposing Ordination Kiss Every Nun Down South).

I thought a *Papal Bull* was a Vatican delicacy, a sort of ring-shaped pastry, or *Torus*.

Torus? That's my sign, all right ... but my parents were a *computer* and a *psychopath* ... (cf JG Ballard's alternative zodiac, using contemporary icons instead of the mundane images scoped 4000 years ago by Chaldean shepherds ... like, *water carriers*? Replace 'em with nuclear missiles ...)

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 963)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 462 OF 963 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC