|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 723 OF 963 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Jun-11-11
 | | Annie K.: <Dom: <Yes, <mack> dotted the final oxymoron on his meisterwerke over 36 hours ago, and began spewing out puns and anagrams instead. Perhaps later the lad will enjoy half a pint of shandy and calm down.>> O RLY?! In that case, he's due congratulations, inhe? Big Conga Rats, <mack>! =) Re.: <Panama hats>
Ouch. Meanwhile, back in fiction, there was that sinister hat featuring in Stanislaw Lem's 'Solaris', too. HATS OFF - the darn things are dangerous! :s <Once> but you can probably run for some major (sorry Dom) political office next, with the diplomatic experience you'll have claim to after this project! ;) |
|
Jun-12-11
 | | Domdaniel: As the Major Domo of this domicile meilleure, I shall certainly raise my hat, for a lady. Oops. That last comma was an 'e' before I corrected it. Down, Sigmund, down, boy ... "Bah Homburg" |
|
Jun-12-11
 | | Annie K.: Heh. Heh heh. :)
Innaresting terminology there. As I recall, you wanted a sacrament, but now it seems you're going straight for caninization? ;) |
|
Jun-12-11
 | | Annie K.: <Dom: <That last comma was an 'e' before I corrected it.>> Comma savage, chéri? ;)
Heh. Thanks for that superbly fitting quote posted on my game page, even if you *were* (partly) trying to annoy me. :D |
|
Jun-13-11
 | | Domdaniel: This is lunacy. |
|
Jun-13-11
 | | Domdaniel: <mack> Indiciacacoethes? What's wrong with Cartesian Cryptonosology? GM is in back, with timeless peanut. (9) |
|
Jun-13-11
 | | Domdaniel: <Annie> Yah. I mean, no, actually. If I'd wanted to annoy you I'd have included the next line, "I don't even have the strength to get up and take another shot". Nasty druggy folk-singing gunslingers.
BTW, I am now the proud, if baffled, owner of my first ever stand-alone digital camera, the kind that isn't built into something else. In fact I haven't had a camera of any kind since somebody tried to do a Cousteau with my movie camera about 20 years ago, to see how it did underwater. It didn't. Now all I need is a mirror, or a rough approximation of where I am. Time to dig out the proprioception kit. |
|
Jun-13-11
 | | Domdaniel: Oracle moves at lightspeed in flimsy boat (7).
Clear firm takes a turn round the bay (7). |
|
Jun-13-11
 | | Domdaniel: Practitioners of taghairm foresee lost love and gnashing of teeth? (5,4) That's difficult, so here's an alternate clue, same answer: Penis cost is perennial. (5, 4) |
|
Jun-14-11
 | | Domdaniel: <Annie> Oops, sorry, I *finally* got 'caninization' ... and to think I even briefly suspected you of a less-than-purrfect spelling ... It's a god's life, innit. |
|
Jun-14-11
 | | Annie K.: Yep, very good. :D
Let me know when you get the comma-comment as well...! ;) |
|
Jun-14-11
 | | Domdaniel: Thanks to Truces (wobbly) and Trices (gone for a Gothic Burton ... Tim, prolly) ... I'm now dangerously close to the 18k postmark. Do I have three utterances left in me?
Time will tell. Et tu, Bruce, as Robin - aka Dick - said to Batman. One. |
|
Jun-14-11
 | | Annie K.: Congrats on the posting milestone!
How's the proprioception going, then? :) And btw, why the camera? Congrats on that too, anyhoo. ;) |
|
| Jun-14-11 | | hms123: 18000+!!!! Lots of exclams just in case. I may want to be a chess writer one day.. |
|
Jun-15-11
 | | Domdaniel: <hms> Arr, it be a thankless task. You feed and clothe the words out of your very own leftovers, you pet them through college and loan them your leather-bound dictionary for sex. But they're never really yours, and they all turn out rotten in the end. Chess writing is even worse. You can be bitten by a FEN and catch a nasty dose of PGN. Which plays hell with the pagination system and is rough on the vowels. When you haven't had a vowel movement all week, you'll wish you'd picked something like birdwatching. In France. Lovely word, *oiseau*. |
|
Jun-15-11
 | | Domdaniel: <Annie> The camera was a gift. I haven't actually risked removing the packaging yet ... it might be one of those 'smart' cameras that decides to snap me from an unflattering angle and send the output to a website for mad people. I used to *live* in a *camera obscura*, yanno. |
|
| Jun-15-11 | | dakgootje: Congrats! 18000 posts.. let alone all those millions of words! Mighty big book that'd make. |
|
| Jun-15-11 | | Once: A little OTT in last night's Nakamura page, perhaps? Kicking AJ may be fine sport, but it is starting to damage the kicker more than the kicked. Can I please ask you to cool it?
Or in words that you might use about me - "a tad self important"? The use of exclams is highly subjective. I absolutely hate them in fiction or journalism. But in posts like these they can be used to convey emotion, denote that we are being sarcastic, ironic, or sincere. It is so hard to indicate emotion and tone in an email or a post. But it's all a matter of style. Some people get just as turned off by excessive word play. I heard one stand-up comedian rehearsing advice he had been given by an older performer. "There are only two rules in comedy. 1. Don't use puns. And 2. don't use puns." |
|
Jun-15-11
 | | Domdaniel: <dak> Thanks. All those words that I might have been *paid* for, if I had the wit to channel them into books and articles and such. But, hey. It's fun. And I wrote a thousand-word newspaper article in the last hour, so I can sometimes do that too. It's all part of my long-term masterplan: when I finally publish a book it will have, oh, anything up to ten potential readers, if I combine my Frogspawn and art-crit 'fanbases'. Maybe even eleven. |
|
| Jun-15-11 | | Once: <if I had the wit to channel them into books and articles and such> I know exactly what you mean! (Oops, a screamer crept in there. Humble whatnots) The problem I find is that CG.com offers instant gratification. I write something without an editor telling me whether it's fit for publication and then I get an almost instant response. Sometimes a good response. Sometimes a bad response. But it's feedback, human contact, a conversation. By contrast, writing a book means months of hard work with with no feedback from anyone. Apart from my son who likes the funny bits, especially references to bottoms and wind. And all the time you are wondering if you've chosen the right theme, the right tone, the right setting. Will people get the point, or is it so screamingly obvious that it really didn't need to be spelt out so explicitly. Then when it's done it's down to the tedious (for me at least) business of error-checking, proof-reading and slaughtering our darlings. And then when you've done all that, you send it off to the slush-pile and waiting for the stream of rejection letters... Or you slip on your mask, pull on the superhero lycra, turn from mild mannered civil servant into everyone's grandma <Once>. And get an instant hit from a short story that may or may not have something to do with chess. If you write something I would be amongst the first in line to read it. But first we both need to knuckle down and do the hard graft... |
|
| Jun-15-11 | | dakgootje: Also, you want your book to be read. But for that, you can use the rules of Simple Humorous Intense To-the-point. Or jokes about that - people love both. |
|
Jun-15-11
 | | Domdaniel: <jokes about that>
- Lookee there! What's *that*? Is it a bird, a plane ...? - No, that's a demonstrative adjective and pronoun.
- Ha ha ha ha. |
|
Jun-15-11
 | | Domdaniel: That that that is is that that that is not is not that that that is is not that that is not that that that is not is not that that is is not that so? And that, to put it mildly, is that. |
|
| Jun-15-11 | | crawfb5: Is the working title, <The That in the Hat>? |
|
| Jun-15-11 | | dakgootje: Have you heard about the bird? |
|
 |
 |
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 723 OF 963 ·
Later Kibitzing> |