|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 724 OF 963 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Jun-15-11 | | hms123: <crawfb5>
Hey! <That's> enough of <that>. Watch it or I will get <jess> to call me so I can sue for trademark infringement. I hope I can afford my fees. |
|
| Jun-15-11 | | crawfb5: <H> I thought all the <that cats> were summering in Maine. <T>hat suits you to a "T"... |
|
Jun-15-11
 | | Domdaniel: Goes well with the Beau Tie ... or is it a Beau Jest? |
|
Jun-15-11
 | | Annie K.: <dakkie> I, uh, "heard" about the bird. It was delishus. <Dom: <it might be one of those 'smart' cameras that decides to snap me from an unflattering angle and send the output to a website for mad people.>> Where...? Oh, you mean here. :)
Methinks the way to get one over on such a camera would be to get the pics <of your own choice> posted first, before it gets the chance to work any mischief. :p <And I wrote a thousand-word newspaper article in the last hour, so I can sometimes do that too.> Aha - thought there might be something like that... ;) |
|
| Jun-15-11 | | mack: <The That in the Hat> In French: <ça chapeau>. |
|
Jun-16-11
 | | Domdaniel: Yes, 'chapeau' is certainly a French word ... for a *wet chap*, I believe. Mrs Thatcher famously disliked wet chaps. The first word looks like Devanagari. Is it some sort of cooker? Maybe a large oven for drying out wet chaps? - The Once-banned unarmed It. |
|
| Jun-16-11 | | mack: Yegads. They don't like cedillas round these parts, do they? |
|
| Jun-16-11 | | dakgootje: Well, you let one fish-goth in - and before you know it, you are over-run. |
|
Jun-16-11
 | | Domdaniel: < you pet them through college>
That was probably meant to be '*put* them through college'. Sigmund says my inner student-abuser is showing. Or else the dog wants to study Germanic Philology and Exobiology. |
|
Jun-16-11
 | | Domdaniel: I gave up drinking coffee recently, as an experiment. I'm going to start again now. Next experiment: ignoring the doings and sayings of the buffoon in Pensacola. There are soft targets and there are giant bouncy castles full of marshmallow and feathers. Down, boy? Quite. |
|
| Jun-16-11 | | dakgootje: I thought college was a petting zoo for grown-ups.
"Ohhh just look at that cute little punk-girl! And that emo-boy - aren't they just adorable? I want to adopt one! (and we shall sell their offspring and make huge profits)" |
|
Jun-16-11
 | | Annie K.: <Dom> thx for notice. :) Good time to take up coffee again, innit? ;)
Re.: t'other thing - I've had a little keyring plaque since I was 17 or so. I saw it in a novelty store, loved it, bought it, and have kept it since... it declares thusly: <I Refuse to Have a Battle of Wits with an Unarmed Person>. I consider it a generally good guideline and advice. |
|
| Jun-16-11 | | crawfb5: <I consider it a generally good guideline and advice.> Yes, but as with much good advice, difficult to follow at times... |
|
| Jun-16-11 | | hms123: And the current case is a particularly difficult one in which to follow that advice. I am with <Dom> on this one, but <jess's> strong feelings are keeping me from the fray. |
|
Jun-16-11
 | | Domdaniel: <Annie> Indeed. And thank you for the box of superstring and wormholes. Of course, Frogspawn Metatheoretic analysis is exempt, as well as being carried out in a jargon which nobody understands. Well, no, <mack> does. But he rarely admits it, in case the oiks and hillbillies figger him for an innerleckshual. Anyhoo, the 'truce' has only led to manic in-fighting on the Goldnak page, including *actual sexist attacks* on Saint Jessica. So I won't play anymore. Plus, World Wars 1.0 and 2.0 both started off as truces. I hadn't actually realized what a genuine gold-plated mentally deficient trog the subject was, until I finally visited his forum and saw his ravings. Blessed are the Cheesemakers. And the earth shall inherit the meek. |
|
Jun-16-11
 | | Domdaniel: <Annie> Cool hebraic authentically kosher caffeine ... and that's just the packaging. One of the things about living in a secular society is that one rarely sees religious 'authorities' adding their stamp to consumer products. Though I can dimly recall the old days, when school textbooks had a little cross (Ϯ, I think ȸ was reserved for porn) and the words <nihil obstat> signifying that a Latin Bishop found nowt objectionable therein. Today I imagine money would change hands for product placement and z-list celeb endorsement. 'Not a bad scissors at all, at all.' -- Father Dougal, Craggy Island. The book covers are also a treat. Though famously vast, my library has few examples of the pecs'n'tits in space genre of illustration. I may have a semi-clad Princess of Barsoom somewhere, courtesy of E.R. Burroughs (compared to fifty or so editions of stuff by W.S. Burroughs, which often came in plain brown paper wrappings). And the aforementioned Podkayne, of course. Cross-referencing the publishers and dates of some of mine with some of yours, I can see a distinct 1960s New English Library school of illustration. I tended to sniff at these, back in the day, and go for a Ballard with a cover borrowed from Max Ernst. Basta. Time to taste. |
|
Jun-16-11
 | | Open Defence: menwhopause ??? |
|
Jun-16-11
 | | Open Defence: Golden Executive / Houdini vs Hosea / Schiller / Wall, 2011 |
|
Jun-16-11
 | | Domdaniel: Some notes on the phrase <Please observe our posting guidelines>: 1. "Please..."
In the American language, 'please' is a polite form which *may* carry an implicit threat. The cop says "Please get out of the car, sir" - he is telling you what you must do, but offering to keep your interaction civil, if you behave.
However, in several other languages and cultures, 'please' may be seen as a sign of weakness. A cop says "get out of the car, or I'll shoot you" - a 'please' in this context confuses the issue and opens loopholes. Maybe the cop isn't armed or doesn't have the power to stop vehicles? Maybe you can make a run for it? 2. "Observe"
This can mean either 'read (and then ignore)' or 'obey'. Again, the ambiguity creates loopholes. 3. "Guidelines"
A 3rd loophole. Guidelines are suggestions, not necessarily backed up by force. Of course, Native speakers of American English know that all this politeness is just a front for raw power. The nice cop standing in front of you and smiling, while his nasty fellow-officer stands behind you with a club. Just the way things are, sir. Now, get out of the damn car while you're still able to. Speakers of English English, Hiberno English, Strine and other varieties may not understand this. Neither may New Yorkers, as the word 'please' is not in common use there. You may recall a story about four guys approached by a researcher and asked "Could I have your opinion on the meat shortage, please?" They respond according to national stereotype: Saudi: "What is 'shortage'?"
North Korean: "What is 'meat'?"
Russian: "What is 'opinion'?"
New Yorker: "What is 'please'?"
Anyhow. 'Please observe our posting guidelines' is polite American for "Do exactly as we say, and we might let you live." |
|
| Jun-16-11 | | achieve: <Dom> There's something I do not get from your stance. Comparisons to WW1 WW2, as you please, but isn't it clear that efforts are directed at defusing the explosive vicious cicle? Jess is prepared to sac some in order to make a truce last that tiny bit longer, for which I applaud her. So easy for her to jump at the opportunity and file sexism charges. She "gets" the point, you magnify it to untenable proportions, imo. By aiding the enforcement team she has become fair game, and a few sexist childish remarks will then not pull her off track. This is only a bleedin chess site, for cripes sake, with posting guidelines, of which some at least are aware, without referring to world wars, and simply aim to remain answerable to those. If AJ joins that club, all for the better. If not, then he is true to his Bi-polarbear-nature, and he should subsequently be ignored. I do get your thinking and emotions, but want to offer a "non-opposing" view. We all know all too well what happens if flames are fanned and fueled. |
|
Jun-16-11
 | | Domdaniel: <mack> Personally, I love cedillas, as long as they're not raw. Nothing like a well-smoked cedilla, rilly, not even *circonflex au naturel* or a good schwa. I must apologize, though. It's entirely my fault that some non-standard characters turn to garbage on this page. Annie told me how to fix it good, but I only did a semi-competent fast repair job with masking tape. I'm an idiot. Some X-wordy thoughts:
₭ṘẎṕҭṏ du jour:
1. Lungs scream, headless man is dismembered. (6, 7)
2. Sun cream – slang, confused. (6, 7)
3. Slag cures man, N. (6, 7)
4. Not playing today in the bloody Balkans? (6, 7) |
|
Jun-16-11
 | | Domdaniel: <Niels> Ja, I understand. I could say "which is why I'm not playing the Goldbug Game anymore", but that wouldn't be strictly true. It wasn't that rational a process. I stopped because it was getting tedious. Also, I *hate* the idea of being part of a mob. Whether it's master-baiters, god-followers or even concert-goers, the crowd emotion thing doesn't do it for me. I had *tried*, I suppose, to play both sides in the Goldbug Game -- sometimes sympathizing when he was victimized (which was reasonably genuine) and sometimes bleeding him a little when he asked too blatantly to be bitten. I found that it was impossible to offer AJ even a modicum of support without becoming a complete toady: he wanted unconditional loyalty, and the rest were heretic subhuman trolls. I knew the guy was trouble five, six years ago. I avoided him for a long time. The lapse was occasioned by 'meeting' during the Pogo game. I remember he got suddenly interested when he heard I was a writer. But when he eventually looked at Frogspawn he discovered I was 'cruel' and 'strange'. Cruel and strange, bubba, and what doesn't kill me makes me stranger. But I never wanted to be part of a lynch mob.
Unless, of course, somebody catches the unlamented <Lemmingfan> and offers him to me, washed and stripped and complete with rope... |
|
Jun-16-11
 | | Domdaniel: <Deffi> Thank you. I've been following your team, though I refrained from actual rooting. But I was aware of the games. I always knew *you* were an adornment to humankind, but I'm also pleased to see Doc Schiller back in the saddle. I have many of his books. And, contrary to the received wisdom of Bouvard and Pecuchet, some of them are *good*. His work on the QGD Tarrasch in particular. I had a chat with Nigel Short about the value of old opening books. We both apparently grew up on John Moles' book on the Winawer French. We both have well-worn and much-annotated copies. The main lines given are almost all out of date now - partly thanks to Nigel's novelties over the years - and yet the *structure* provided by Moles is still good. The same is true of Bellin on the Dutch and Schiller on the Tarrasch. |
|
Jun-16-11
 | | Open Defence: I still go through my old opening books, not so much for the exact variations but more for the strategy and principles behind them |
|
| Jun-16-11 | | dakgootje: You know, I wanted to write some punable post about how you should've joined us watching and rooting - with all kinds of tree-related [and fairly obvious] jokes. But then I walked around a bit, thinking whether I could improve on that idea. And I happened to look outsight. And it was beautiful, a light evening sky with, from the left corner a big dark growling cloud rolling - just how waves can tumble and fall in its haste to get to the beach. And everything was quiet, not a bird in the air, only the occasional flash of lightning. It wasn't here yet, not a sound - just the image of one big unavoidable mass of anger. And I stood amazed for minutes behind my window, enjoying every second. Afterwards, I completely forgot I would write some silly post. Just noticed when I opened my cg.com-tab that I was kiblingering in your forum |
|
 |
 |
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 724 OF 963 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
|
|
|