|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 744 OF 963 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Aug-04-11 | | dakgootje: Ooooeh 2 new things I have to mention
- Thanks for the preciselierst explanation :)
- I somehow broke the forum with my jinxapunction post and it now seems like I want to make some clever meta-joke with the sole-y. However, I am not in on the joke. |
|
Aug-04-11
 | | Domdaniel: *Would the indubitably cool Dutch gentleman in the wraparound shades please refrain from jinxing the page. Thank you, and dank u wel.* Youthful high jinks, I imagine.
"I heard about his winning the award" and "I heard about him winning the award" are both acceptable, to my liberal anything-goes-bar-stupidity attitude. Different nuances, though. 'him' is more natural, more demotic; 'his' is a bit like one of those dubious rules about 'split' infinitives, based on false analogies between Latin and English. It sounds fussy and pedantic, even if correct. I guess the question is 'What did you hear about?' Was it him (winning an award), or was it his winning (of) an award? I find it safer to use 'her', whenever there's a doubt. |
|
| Aug-04-11 | | hms123: <dak>. <Dom> I have to weigh in pedantically. I much prefer the admittedly Latin-based "his" because of its roots in the genitive. One does hear both quite often. |
|
Aug-04-11
 | | Domdaniel: <hms> That's the thing about genitives - it like they were made with roots in mind. Spooky. |
|
| Aug-05-11 | | dakgootje: Think the genitive is disappearing in Dutch actually. I will try to look into it - even though this isn't that easy to find. As opposed to, for instance, the difference between continually and continuously where you can simply google the two words. <I guess the question is 'What did you hear about?' Was it him (winning an award), or was it his winning (of) an award?> That sounds about right and natural - but is it grammatically correct? ;) It's not really that I have a sudden desire to write topnotch grammatically-perfect English -- just curious about the rules :) |
|
| Aug-05-11 | | whiteshark: <dakgootje: <Think the genitive is disappearing in Dutch actually.>> De datief is de genitief zijn dood. Same here, unfortunately. |
|
Aug-05-11
 | | Domdaniel: Datives? You can't give them away, these days.
O for a good vocative.
Or is that a subjunctive? Should I say, rather, "O good vocative, assist me!"? Good grief. It's like explorer Henry Rawlinson's blocked nose - "The datives are freddly". |
|
Aug-05-11
 | | OhioChessFan: I am suprised to find the Domine forum to be so provocative. |
|
Aug-05-11
 | | chancho: User: teacher |
|
Aug-05-11
 | | Domdaniel: <provocative> Indeed ... at the *vocational school* they asked if I had a *vocation* ... all because I'd found a way to summon up memories by addressing letters of the alphabet. Evocative, it was. |
|
Aug-05-11
 | | Domdaniel: *Anaspinnaque cloaca*.
Down & Dirty. |
|
Aug-05-11
 | | Domdaniel: <chancho> Does User: teacher
own User: pet? |
|
| Aug-06-11 | | hms123: <Games played by top US GMs are part of the historical record, regardless of the quality of the opposition.> Well nuanced. |
|
Aug-06-11
 | | OhioChessFan: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0PI... |
|
Aug-06-11
 | | Domdaniel: <HMS (15129^0.5)> Thanks. Petty squabbles and bursts of flame aside, I think the point has the advantage of being true. It would be criminal to delete a Nakamura game. I've just been rereading and enjoying the late Bill Hook's autobiography, Hooked on Chess ... there was a guy who played the Winawer against Fischer and Short, who won an olympiad medal and featured on a postage stamp ... and is scrupulous in referring to his 'weak master' status. People respond better to humble than to the other thing -- assuming human interaction is your goal rather than total world domination. |
|
| Aug-06-11 | | mworld: malp on a stick really doesn't work as well as it should. |
|
Aug-08-11
 | | Domdaniel: And this is 19k. |
|
| Aug-08-11 | | dakgootje: Congratulations!
Did you know, if I post an additional 85 posts, you will approximately have pi-times more posts - accurate to about the first 10 numbers. Although a major flaw in that plan is that it supposes you will not post; and that it doesn't really matter in any case. |
|
Aug-08-11
 | | Domdaniel: <dak> You mean 6048? I can only get it to work as far as 3.1415... then it has a 3 instead of a 9. Innaresting, though. 6048 is also 1/60th of 9! -- but you knew that. |
|
| Aug-08-11 | | mworld: wow.
Think about how many books worth that number could be. I'd say about every 4 posts of yours could break down into one large page of a book...looking at a 5 book series there - large books too. |
|
| Aug-09-11 | | dakgootje: It worked yesterday night.. and I was not drunk :( |
|
Aug-09-11
 | | Domdaniel: Innaresting. *Dak Numbers*, or numbers which "worked yesterday" ... is there, I wonder, a fixed number of Dak Numbers under one billion? One trillion? The nth Mersenne prime? Or do all these things change from day to day too? Is this, finally, a completely chaotic number system, where Riemann's hypothesis holds every other Tuesday and you can't trust Godel when there's a 'G' in the month? Giun, Giuly, August ... |
|
| Aug-09-11 | | dakgootje: Certainly - there is a fixed number, which happens to change. I suspect the amount and direction of the change are due to the interference of the number with itself. My experiments have shown the number is ever-changing when you ask a fixed question; and fixed when you ask a changing question. So far it has therefore not been established whether it is a real number or an imaginary number. I call this the 'imagined reality'-duality - it will become a very important term in the field of quantum-mathematics. |
|
Aug-09-11
 | | OhioChessFan: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_OyNYqunw9... |
|
| Aug-09-11 | | dakgootje: We are all taking part in the dream of the Red King - he'd better not wake up. |
|
 |
 |
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 744 OF 963 ·
Later Kibitzing> |