ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 218 OF 801 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Jun-22-07 | | Tactic101: I want some revenge for my crushing defeat at your hands. It's only fair (for me, not for you). I'm gonna fight bad for this one. Oh, don't worry about my "trash talking". Within 10-15 moves, I'll probably shut up, being beaten again. |
|
| Jun-22-07 | | MostlyAverageJoe: <Tactic101: I guess you found it using the opening explorer> I may be wrong, but I don't think that opening explorer == book. It just seems to search the games in CG database, until either it reaches the 20th move, or only one matching game exists in the database. |
|
| Jun-22-07 | | Ragh: <thanks for your patience> No problem, take your own time. I see how busy you are with all these correspon"dances". |
|
Jun-22-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Thanks <Joe>, I'm looking in my <Chessmaster database> at the moment, its huge but 4000 years out of date. It has games played by <Phaoraghs> in it. |
|
Jun-22-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: GOOD GRIEF!! It feels like we are all playing one big game!! But who is on who's side? And, more importantly, who will keep messing up the FENs? Ok me for the last one. |
|
| Jun-22-07 | | Chess Classics: <(a rare appearance by the famous <CC>)> When did I become famous? And when did my appreances become rare? And why do you need mortal enemies? I merely sent someone on a different message board an explanation about why his anti-gun control arguments didn't make sense, and now he shot me. The irony. Regards,
CC |
|
Jun-22-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <Joe> I'm saving your new movie you bought me for bedtime. Looking forward to it!! no hints please I want it to be a surprise. |
|
Jun-22-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <CC> Ha! Clearly your enemy has no sense of humor. I was YOUR mortal enemy for a while, but I gave up cuz you never got mad. |
|
Jun-22-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: (another not-quite-so-rare appearance by <CC>) |
|
Jun-22-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: If you look carefully, I believe I now have the decisive upper hand with <elixir>. Score! |
|
| Jun-22-07 | | Chess Classics: You might consider slightly less coffee.
Regards,
CC |
|
Jun-22-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Heh. (another now-frequent appearance by <CC>) |
|
Jun-22-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Yo <CC> have a look at my Correspondence game with <Elixir> (first one on my Profile at the top) I'm CREAMING HIM!! |
|
| Jun-22-07 | | Chess Classics: Yipee. 'Course, you're not doing so well in the false modesty battle. Regards,
CC |
|
Jun-22-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Holy crap <CC> I just played through your game against GM Maurice Ashley. Holy cow!! You are ten times better than me man.
I bet he remembers that game. Did you lose on time?
Holy crap. |
|
Jun-22-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <CC> I'll be going for a <queen sac> against <Elixir> if he ever comes back. Maybe five or six of them! |
|
Jun-22-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: (another very frequent appearance by <CC>) |
|
| Jun-22-07 | | MostlyAverageJoe: <jessicafischerqueen: ... Thanks again for doing the thorough engine analysis.> Huh? I just hinted at the analysis. But given the profuse thanks bestowed upon me, here's the real analysis that I had saved. The credit is due to Hiarcs, all I did was insert "Played move evaluates at" and "Better line" for readability. All valuations are absolute (from white's point of view). Initial analysis: 10 minutes per move, confirmed with 21-ply verification of the candidate inaccuracies. [Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Jess"]
[Black "Tactic"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "Hiarcs 11.1 MP + MostlyAverageJoe"]
1. c4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. cxd5 exd5 5. Bg5 Be7 6. e3 O-O 7. Bd3 Re8 8. Nge2 c6 9. Ng3 Nbd7 10. Nf5 Nf8 11. Nxe7+ Qxe7 12. Qf3 <Played move evaluates at (+0.04). Better line:(+0.33) 12. O-O h6 13. Bh4 Ng6 14. Bg3 Bg4 ...> Ng6 <Played move evaluates at (+0.82).
Better line: (+0.04) 12... Qb4 13. O-O Qxb2 14. Rac1 Bg4 15. Qg3 ...> 13. Bxf6 Qxf6 14. Qxf6 gxf6 15. h4 Bd7 <Played move evaluates at (+1.03). Better line:(+0.95) 15... Ne7 16. Kd2 Bf5
17. g4 Bxd3 18. Kxd3 f5 19. g5 Nc8 ...>
16. O-O-O Rac8 17. h5 Ne7 18. Rh4 Kh8 19. Rf4 f5 20. g4 Rg8 21. gxf5 Rg5 22. f6 Ng8 23. Rh1 h6 24. e4 dxe4 25. Nxe4 Rd5 <Played move evaluates at (+1.52) Better move: (+0.96) 25... Be6 26. Nxg5 hxg5 27. Re4 Bd5 28. f3 Bxe4 ...> 26. Bc4 Rxd4 27. Bxf7 Nxf6 28. Rxf6 Rxe4 29. Bb3 Rce8 30. Rxh6+ Kg7 31. Rg6+ Kh8 32. h6 <Played move evaluates (+1.13) with this continuation: 32... Be6 33. Bc2 Rc4 34. Rf6 Bd5 35. Rh3 Be4 ...> Better line: <+1.81> 32. Rhg1 Re1 33. Rxe1 Rxe1 34. Kd2 Re8 35. h6 c5 ... |
|
Jun-22-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Holy cow thanks so much <Joe>!! now I can replay the game and look at the <better lines>!! Thanks for taking the time to help me learn. |
|
| Jun-22-07 | | chessmoron: My god! Only 5 more pages to topple <WannaBe> and I stuck 9. |
|
Jun-22-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: hi <Wilson> take a look at my position against <Elixir> now!! The pages filled up from <Correspondence Banter>. I have 3 opponents actually making moves now.
Will help spam your place next few days if you don't mind-- I'm trying for the <most kibbutzes> trophy now. I want 10,000 by July, and 30,000 by August, and 100,000 by September when I have to start "work." |
|
| Jun-22-07 | | Ragh: Astronomical targets!! |
|
| Jun-22-07 | | Tactic101: Let's settle this once and for all. <jess>, let's see you challenge CC to a game. Should be interesting. |
|
Jun-22-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Well, you are also ahead of your own projections!!
Rah!! |
|
Jun-22-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <tactic> I'm going to play <CC> on <Sasquatch.com>. Details are in his profile.
I'm scared to play him now!! You should play through his game against <GM Ashley>. Like <Topalov>, <CC> has a <Mighty Najdorf>! |
|
 |
 |
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 218 OF 801 ·
Later Kibitzing> |