ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 351 OF 801 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Feb-18-08
 | | jessicafischerqueen: BLUNDER BUS
<Misadventures Against the “Smith-Morra” Gambit> Jessica (1878) v. NN (1818)
Yahoo (2 hours each time control)
1. e4 c5
2. d4 cxd4
3. c3 dxc3
4. Bc4
<OK welcome to the “Smith Morra gambit”… I never even heard of it, but I figure if he’s going to go 4.Bc4 I’ve already taken the bait and my only move really is 4…cxb2
. I was happy here to tell you the truth cuz I thought this was NOT THEORY (it is, in fact) and I’m very happy to have two pawns thanks very much> 4….cxb2
5. Bxb2 Nc6
6. Nf3 e6
<well he’s got them bishops lined up like laser beams and massive control of the FOUR CENTER SQUARES so even I can see the pressure on my g7 pawn, and that it's going to be VERY TRICKY to get castled from here--it is, however, quite "doable." DAG NABBIT just tricky. Black must be VERY precise> 7. o-o d6
8. Qe2 Nge7
<My plan is to play f6, Ng6, Be7, o-o. IT ALL SEEMED SO BEAUTIFUL IN MY HEAD> 9. Rd1 Qc7?
<This is where I started seeing phantoms. All I had to do was play 9…Ng6 and BLACK IS PERFECTLY FINE, AHEAD IN FACT according to my “Shredder.” Though my Shreddy likes pawns, so who knows really. I took a long time here and I was “afraid” of my pinned d-pawn and wanted to undo the pin before proceeding. This said, I don’t think Qc7 is itself a blunder, it’s just not as good as Ng6> 10. Nc3 f6????
<Losing, of course, on the spot. Sigh. I simply overlooked the danger to my d6 square due to my Queen being on the c7 square—no excuse, same as hanging a damn piece. After 10.Nc3, of course, the prophylactic 10….a6 has to be played before I continue any developing plans. My brilliant 10…f6 allows his Knight to crash in 11.Nb5! and he gets a tempo on my Queen which has to move and because it has to move I cannot defend my d-pawn and after my Queen moves (don't matter where even) He goes Nxd6+ --- and no matter what I do he gets a PINWHEEL and I lose pieces wholesale, Black is TOTALLY BUSTED.> 11. Nb5 RESIGN <for obvious reasons> OK here’s how it COULD have gone if I had seen the necessary prophylactic: 10…a6
Which gives us:
 click for larger view<OK and Black is perfectly fine, but has to be SUPER CAREFUL. White has no immediate dire threat to Black—In fact I think with careful play Black should be winning here with evenly matched opponents. But say White now plays 11.Qe3 here.
Black has to be very careful— For example 11…f6 (which I had been planning so I could move my DSB and castle) is a BIG MISTAKE in this partiular position because it allows 12. Na4 with the threat 13. Nb6.After 11.Qe3, Black must play 11…Ng6, if for nothing else so the DSB can cover the black d-pawn. This makes all the difference in the world!! That is, once 11…Ng6 is played, if White tries the tricky 12.Na4, then Black can go 12…b5 13.Nb6 Rb8 14.Nxc8 and NOW White can take 14…bxc4!! Note that if the Black DSB was not covering the black d-pawn here, White would have 15.Nxd6+! with a won game. JUST TO SHOW YOU HOW CAREFULLY ONE MUST PLAY IF YOU GRAB GAMBIT PAWNS and the guy gets open lines and diagonals and big lead in development. I believe the position from the FEN is certainly better for Black. “Shreddy” gives it plus 7.0 or so for Black…> Oh well live and learn….
Comments/Analysis on this FIASCO and the Smith-Morra in general are WELCOME!! |
|
Feb-18-08
 | | jessicafischerqueen: er... plus .70, of course.
stupid shreddy |
|
| Feb-18-08 | | Open Defence: < Boomie: 4...cxb2 The second bite of a bad apple is twice as sour > second bite ?!!! WHERE ??!!! WHERE ??!!! |
|
| Feb-18-08 | | Boomie: 4...cxb2 The second bite of a bad apple is twice as sour. Black seems to do better with 4...Nc6 according to the OE. I think you were a little over awed by white's lead in development and that took you out of your game. An active defense is required, always looking for a spot to sac a pawn to gain tempo. I think 4...Nc6 is passive although it can't be bad. 4...Nf6 seems better and is more your style. For example, 4...Nf6 5. e5 Ne4 6. Nf3 Qa5+ (wheeee) 7. Nbd2 d5 (heh) 8. exd6 Nxd6 10. 0-0 Nc6
 click for larger view
Looks like fun for Morphettes of all ages.
6...e6, like 4...Nc6, is OK but not your style. More fun is 6...Qb6 7. Qe2 Nf6 8. e5 d5 (arooo) 9. exf6 dxc4 10. fxg7 Bxg7 (wow) 11. Bxg7 Rg8 12. Bc3 Bf5 13. Qxc4 (...Bd3 is too gruesome) Bxb1 14. 0-0 Bf5
 click for larger view
Development is almost equal and you're up a pawn. The king in the center is scary but you can't have everything. 7...d6 I would prefer Nf6 to try to get d5 with tempo. 8...Nge7 I think this is too slow but not fatal. Nf6 is probably better. 9...Qc7 Shredded Wheat is right and the ? is probably deserved. My advice is "to thine own self be true." Play your style which is open and tactical, not Steinitzy stodgy defensive. You are hearby sentenced to study Morphy which will show you how to play the open game that you enjoy so much. |
|
| Feb-18-08 | | Eyal: Hi, Jess - well, first of all you deserve compliments for having the courage to post a game which you lost. I know it can be quite painful and/or embarrassing, although it's also quite educational at times... About the game itself - I agree with Tim that simply Nf6 would have been the best idea in several opportunities. This whole scheme beginning with f6 looks very suspicious - too time-consuming in this type of position. Even if you did play the correct 10...a6, White already has Nd5 ideas in several lines where things are starting to get quite unpleasant for Black. Regarding the blunder - I think it's a good example of how "gambit psychology" works sometimes: you put your opponent under pressure and so get him off balance. It seems that you were sort of "hypnotized" by the dangers emanating from the mighty bishops and were so occupied with solving them, that you didn't pay attention to a threat coming from a different direction - that of Nb5 - which you would probably notice under "normal" circumstances. Heh - I see your games are leading to some comments that might be somewhat cryptic for future generations... (Mark Kopelow vs B Wall, 1976, J Canal Oliveras vs J Rosell Palau, 1983) |
|
| Feb-18-08 | | mack: My contributions to Fischeriana, having trawled through the scholarly archive JSTOR: 'I've tended to like figures who were rebellious and extremely competent and sometimes rather arrogant. At the time that Bobby Fischer was having a prominent chess match with Boris Spassky, I was one of the people who rather liked Fischer's impossible attitude toward the rest of the world and his ability to get away with it (up to a point) because he was so good at what he did, so gifted.' Robert Pinsky
'If you say to Bobby Fischer, "Calm down, chess is only a game" your point will be obscure. Chess *is* the business of his life; he has no other; his only interest outside is in seeing the other fellow's nerve crack. This may also be true of children. Similarly, when Rangers play Celtic, not only many people get killed, but the event is central to the lives of many people present.' Mary Midgley
'Q: For some reason I find these questions about compositional processes and where art comes from particularly mystifying with musical composers: Mozart, for instance, what he could do in his head! A: And why is it that a person who's not Mozart can't do it? But if you're Mozart, or even Bobby Fischer playing chess, it's grace. You've been granted some grace.' Q: Lynn Keller; A: Susan Howe
I think it says it all for Bobby's widespread impact that a simple search for "Bobby Fischer" in Jstor touches articles dealing with subjects such as TIME magazine, de re belief, pessimistic Darwinism, privacy, job application letters, rules of language, justice and human good, computer chess, merit, problem-solving, high court decision making, Milan Kundera, estimation problems, traffic regulation, interviews with Fernando Arrabal, Robert Pinsky and Susan Howe, and a David Meltzer poem. Everyone knows Bobby, man. |
|
Feb-18-08
 | | Domdaniel: <Jess> Ouch. I think Eyal is right about gambit psychology. Worrying about potential dangers is stressful, and it's easy to overlook a threat - which is what makes 'unsound' gambits playable in practice. I caved in a couple of weeks ago when hit with the Korchnoi gambit against the Dutch. It went 1.d4 e6 2.Nf3 f5 3.h3 Nf6 4.g4, and I accepted it with 4...fxg4 5.hxg4 Nxg4. Apparently 4...d5 is better, ignoring the kingside jab and grabbing some centre. But I saw phantoms too: I thought the g-pawn would be a danger if I didn't take it. It's always a good idea in these cases to return material to regain the initiative. I tried to, but it was too late - my king was already in trouble. Against this line of the Morra, could you have played ...Nf6 instead of the more circuitous ...Nge7? It looks like e5 might then be a threat for white, but it's not really dangerous. As the others have said, the ...f6 idea is too slow and artificial. And I think ...Qc7 is actually a good move - as long as ...a6 follows at once. Otherwise, well, ouch. Bc4 is analogous to a similar line in the Danish Gambit after 1.e4 e5 (which has been analyzed to a dead draw!). It really shouldn't work in the Morra. |
|
Feb-18-08
 | | Domdaniel: <Deffi> Heh ... I think that second bite might be round the back ... the Dark Side of the Apple. But it's a little peck rather than a crater. |
|
| Feb-18-08 | | Open Defence: STAY AWAY from the DARK SIDE OF THE APPLE!!!! |
|
Feb-18-08
 | | jessicafischerqueen: There is no Dark Side of the Apple, really. Matter of fact, it's all dark... OK WHAT RECORD IS THAT LINE FROM???
No Googling... |
|
Feb-18-08
 | | Domdaniel: <click ... bzzz ...> Apple Base One to Earth. Phase one of the mission accomplished. We have established our secret base on the Apple, over on the dark side as per plan. We'll never be seen here, and we've stretched some polysaccharide fake apple skin across the landing zone/ bite mark - just to make sure. Tell the Scientist Comrades that <blue> would have blended in better, but never mind. Red is fine, and politically *krasnoyarskishnost*. They won't suspect a thing until the Worm emerges ... |
|
| Feb-18-08 | | Red October: <DOMDANIEL> THE POLITBURO is onto your capitalist scheme to sell apple scrapes for huge somes of money... see your forum for the POLITBURO's stern action |
|
| Feb-18-08 | | Red October: <huge somes of money> hmmm I'm competing with Bill now .. hmm huge somes of some money .... |
|
| Feb-18-08 | | WBP: <Deffi> <<huge somes of money> hmmm I'm competing with Bill now ..> I'm sorry, but I've worked very hard to <Achieve> my <Dom>inant role as <<Maestro of the Typo>>. <Eyal> not allow any competitors! <Jess> you try and catch me. (In the immoral words of Dr. King, "I have a dream!") I know, many typos are like puns, we groan--many people <Boomie> for mine. |
|
Feb-18-08
 | | jessicafischerqueen: HI BILL HOW THE HECK ARE YOU????
You've come just in the nick of time.. |
|
| Feb-18-08 | | WBP: Hey <Jess> I'm fine, thank you. And how are you? Korea continues to treat you well? May I say that I was deeply moved by your recent comments regarding the late RJF and your father. Have not yet been able to see <KingCrusher's> video on it, but I shall soon. I'm actually very busy--teaching five classes (all different--but I am doing the Bigfoot class again!), along with an Independent Study. and have been thus quite busy. In fact, I must take off now (there are young minds awaiting corruption). But I am trying to follw the big Linares tourny. Cheerio! |
|
| Feb-18-08 | | Ziggurat: <Do you have time to watch the BIG TOURNMENT? Toppy is winning.> I don't, really ... As you know, the games are played during office hours here, and my job (unlike yours) doesn't allow me to slack of at the moment. I did notice that Toppy was leading during a 20-second review of chess sites earlier tonight. <I just published an ABORTION I played against the <Smith Morra Gambit> in my forum.> Now, however, my kids are asleep so I just might take a look. |
|
| Feb-18-08 | | Ziggurat: OK ... I don't have much to say, because as you pointed out, you actually lost because of the blunder on move 10, even if the position was already unpleasant. The Morra gambit *is* dangerous, and I always have a hard time with it (playing either side, strangely enough - one of my weak spots?). You can try to avoid it by 1 e4 c5 2 d4 cxd4 3 c3 <Nf6> which will typically transpose to the Alapin Sicilian, which is maybe a bit dull but easier to play. Going <4...cxb2> is even more dangerous than the "standard" Morra where Black takes just one pawn. As also pointed out by others, 5...Nc6 may be a bit slow. You want to play e6, Nf6, B(somewhere), d6 in some order and castle, but as you noted, Black needs to be very precise. Actually, playing a number of theme games as Black in the Morra would probably be an excellent exercise in defence and prophylaxis. I would probably benefit quite a lot from it, if I ever get the time ... |
|
| Feb-18-08 | | Open Defence: back to Blue for tonight :) |
|
Feb-18-08
 | | Domdaniel: <Abject Recanting Dept> The Glorious Apple is a fine fruit and has played a pivotal role in human history -- Isaac Newton, The Beatles, Adam and Steve (Jobs), et cetera. I myself was an Apple Mac person until the shortage of chess stuff in the 1990s made me switch to a PC. This should really go in Deffi's forum, but I'm worried that the sentry apples are in shoot-on-sight mode. How'd you like *them* apples? |
|
| Feb-18-08 | | Open Defence: heh! when I was ill my Grandma used to make me hot stewed apples with cinnamon ... loved it!! |
|
| Feb-18-08 | | Boomie: <JessArooo: I really can't thank you enough for giving me such a thorough analysis> Yes you can so don't overdo it! That you find my work useful is thanks enough. We'll get you to master/mistress or die trying. |
|
| Feb-18-08 | | achieve: Touché.
I tried that too but failed at first attempt already... Not dead yet, though. A combined effort is called for-- and is being delivered. As <Ziggurat> pointed out, in addition to your advise: <Actually, playing a number of theme games as Black in the Morra would probably be an excellent exercise in defence and prophylaxis.> is very sensible and makes for a balanced approach, as one will be subject to wild and vigorous attacks, probably not sound- and needs to be skilled and unfazed, mentally, to excercise some intelligent defense for a period of time, to then emerge well on top and finish things off... ALL aspects of the game need to be practised in a balanced, fit for-specific-person, way. |
|
| Feb-18-08 | | achieve: PS. Two corrections re. my post:
<...in addition to your advise:>"your" = Boomie <for a period of time> should be: "over an extended period of time" |
|
Feb-18-08
 | | Domdaniel: Um, I got a question, Doc. If a period of time *isn't* extended, how long is it exactly? I don't need to know this anytime soonish. |
|
 |
 |
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 351 OF 801 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
|
|
|