ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 433 OF 801 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Sep-27-08 | | Eyal: <Jess> Nice finish... I think that Black must have blundered somehow before reaching the diagram position, because it should be practically winning for White after your 20.Nf5!. If he retreats with the queen (say, 20...Qc7) instead of playing 20...Bxf5, there's the winning tactic of 21.Nxd6 Qxd6 22.e5! Nxe5 23.Rad1 Nd5 24.f4; or 23...Qc7 24.Bxe5 Rxe5 25.Rxe5 Qxe5 26.Rd8+ Ne8 27.Qe4! But even if you overlook that, Black is in big trouble in this line after the natural 22.f4 - an e5-f5 advance should be quite crushing. This advancement of the e- and f- pawns, which was your original plan, indeed seems to be stronger than giving up your DSB with Bxf6 (even in exchange for doubling Black's K-side pawns), especially once you can get rid of Black's DSB with Nxd6. |
|
| Sep-27-08 | | Woody Wood Pusher: <JFQ> 21.Nf5 is a great move, definitely seems to be winning. Your plan of advancing f-and-e pawns also seems to be winning as well though so I guess its just a case of taking your pick! Black was in a lot of trouble either way! |
|
| Sep-27-08 | | Woody Wood Pusher: <JFQ> OK, just read your message and I understand completely. I know a couple of people just like you who take every game 'personally' as it were and almost never play friends. It seems the more I learn about you, the more I understand why Fischer is your favourite player! I recognize a 'killer instinct' when I see it and I respect that. In a way I wish I had been more serious like you when I was still improving, I suspect it would have made me a better player. (as it was I was far too frequently the one having my ego crushed, as opposed to doing the crushing LOL) Fischer has one hell of a lot to answer for I tell you! |
|
| Sep-27-08 | | achieve: <Jess> I was just about to write the Muled BUM, while reading up on some Nickel & Jess, when I read you say: <Mrs. Likes to Kill People on the Chessboard>, well along those lines, and started laughing hysterically... Here I was, all prepared and buttoned up for a classy BLUMMMEDY BLAM, and now I've cracked up laughing... Couldn't help it!
Monsieur going to start all over again.
<Nf5> Very strong and enterprising--- I considered the positional squeeze with the K-side pawn advance... Black's basically helpless. The Black Q-sac against the 2 rooks is also very interesting to play out against the strong engine. |
|
| Sep-27-08 | | Eyal: <Jess> PS I had another look at the position from your game, and the line with the trade of Queen for two Rooks, despite the apparent material balance, should also be completely won for White. After the forced sequence [20.Nf5 Bxf5 21.exf5] Qxe1+ 22.Rxe1 Rxe1+ 23.Bf1: click for larger viewBlack has too many problems related to the safety of his king and the uncoordinated placement of his pieces. For example: 23...Ne7 24.Qd2.
23...Ne5 24.Nxb7 (not 24.Qd2?? Nf3+) followed by Bc3 after the bishop retreats. 23...Bxc5 fxg6 Bf8 (or 24...Be7 25.gxf7+ Kxf7 26.Bc3 Re6 27.Bc4 Nd5 28.Qxh7) 25.Bxf6 gxf6 26.gxh7+. Btw, is that the only game you played today?
|
|
Sep-27-08
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <Cabin>-- Thanks for taking the time and the effort to analzye further... It looks a little ghostly to see your FEN.
Before I played <20.Nf5>, I calculated the Queen sac line exactly to the FEN position you just posted. It's like looking at a picture from my brain, seeing it on the page there. After I reached your FEN position in my brain, this is how "sophisticated" my conclusion was while playing. <Well I figure I can beat him from here>. I didn't spend even a second trying to calculate the line further before moving on to other thoughts in my "pre-move calculation." I spent around 15 minutes thinking before making my move here. If he had in fact gone for the line, then I hope I would have found all your refutations of his potential moves. But who knows what he might have played... it's the "game that never happened"... My brain is fried right now, so I will "wake myself up" playing out your posted lines on my board before I play tomorrow's game. Yes, I only played one game today and I did it under "optimal conditions..." Clean house, clean mind, well rested, well fed, relaxed, excited to play-- and I really took a lot of time on my clock with the Opening and transition into Middle Game. I went in to the game thinking to myself-- OK-- I'm going to give this my very best effort-- I want to win this game. This one game. Of course I was tempted to play another-- but I'm glad I didn't. Instead I ran my Shredder over it, posted the critical position, and then I studied chess for maybe six more hours after. That included viewing some <chess vids>, playing through some <English games> using my computer, Playing through <English lines> with the <OE>, reading a bit of chess history, and making moves in three of my current correspondence games at <letsplaychess.com>. A long time ago <branko> advised me to play only one game a day if I was playing seriously at a long time control. It takes some restraint, but same drill tomorrow...
I may play the Black pieces.. but who know, I might be tempted to try another <!.c4>. Mrs. enjoying the New Opening- early days yet. |
|
| Sep-28-08 | | achieve: Hola, <Jess> == Sent you an emu already, but some thoughts on 'future plans' and EG practising BLIND, will follow later today... Well, about he Blind thing: I think it works miracles for me... I started to use my keyboard more, instead of my mouse, and playing through games from my engine with the arrow keys, and got the luminous idea to disable the board (no squares + pieces visible), but WITH the notation visible, and typing in the moves, practising basic pawn mates--gradually adding a piece or two-- and thus play them out BLIND, all the way to mate... Even the B+N mate with over 25 moves involved in the procedure, I'm managing now... Although I'm very familiar with that one. I'm becoming less <visually dependent> (or impaired, for that matter) The big challenge is of course to practise that in more complex and 'unfamiliar' positions... I like the training! |
|
Sep-28-08
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <Niels> heh
Just read parts 2 and 3 of your EMU--
I think I'll leave the post I just made, as I think it "gets the job done" and it certainly doesn't break any posting guidelines. Nor does it break my new resolution to refrain from insulting ANY <CG.com member> ever again in the future. On a much happier note, I look forward indeed to your treatise on <BLIND> training? I'm not even sure what you mean...
Mrs. No- Eyes.
Whacka I stayed up all night watching Horror movies and today I made an "executive decision" not to play chess. I am not afraid to play-- but chess is sacred to me. Even though there are only two days out of each week I can play, I'm not playing when I'm overtired. So I've been spending my day cleaning my house, and doing "light chess enjoyment." 1. Spent a few hours with the GMAN game
2. Analyzed a few <Kingscrusher> videos. 3. Played through a few the <Great GM Smyslov>'s games he won with <1.c4> using my computer to help me understand. Funny, sometimes "it" didn't understand either!! HAHAHAAHAHAHAAH
4.. Read a GREAT, GREAT article by the <Great GM Hans Ree> at <chesscafe.com>... Where he gives a link to this
SIMPLY OUTSTANDING CHESS VIDEO RESOURCE FEATURING THE <incredibly interesting> comments of the <Great GM Viktor Kortchnoi> on computers, styles, openings, experience, humanity, Cheparaniov, suicide, winning, losing, and so much more- Here is the link--
http://www.nhchess.com/index.html
I wonder why the best chess writers are always <Dutch>? <Donner, Krabbe, Ree...> Jessica Rotterdam Werken |
|
| Sep-28-08 | | achieve: Heh - Ironic indeed... Well, it shows how hard it is to keep an 'empty' iggy list; it consumes valuable energy... But the blind practise is cool, eh? I started it because I HAD to use the arrow keys, in order to eleviate the muscle= and nervous strain from over-using my mouse, in my right arm. -- The Grammar King |
|
Sep-28-08
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <nIELS>
whopPA!
heh I still don't understand what you mean by the Blind training, or how to do it... Waiting further instructions via EMU or posted here... Mrs. Loves Smyslov |
|
| Sep-28-08 | | achieve: <Jess> Cafeine, eh? Gosh, you produced that great post at a lightning pace... heh
I'll be checking the Ree article now... |
|
Sep-28-08
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <caffeine>?
No idea to what you might be referring to...
I start every morning with a <pint of aviation fuel>, whether I need it or not... Mrs. Loves Chess so much I think I'd Die if I didn't have an Internet connection-- Seriously, if I didn't have one I'd immediately move to Eastern Europe just to play chess in the streets YOU THINK I'M KIDDING??? |
|
| Sep-28-08 | | achieve: <Jess> I'll post the blind thing here... OK - well, it's just that when using the shredder interface to analyse or play, in order to move the pieces, you HAVE to drag the Piece from one square to the next... BUT IF THE BOARD IS INVISIBLE YOU CAN'T DRAG A PIECE heh - so I then can just type like: h2e5 and the engine sees the move as Bh2-e5, and then replies... So I just type in the moves, no on-screen board needed! In fact I want to use specifically, to fix a position in my head, vsualize, and play on BLIND by typing in move coordinates to move pieces, and yuse the arrow keys to take back a move if needed... That's what I accidentally stumbled upon... |
|
Sep-28-08
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Brilliant!!
However, I'll need step by step instructions on how to make the board invisible, and, perhaps more importantly, how to make it visible again after.... No need to hurry with the instructions.
Mrs. Can't work my Chess Engines very well |
|
| Sep-28-08 | | achieve: <YOU THINK I'M KIDDING???> Not for a MOMENT! |
|
| Sep-28-08 | | achieve: <Jess> Just click on 'window' in the menu above the board, and you'll see the 'board' in the drop down menu <checked> ---> then you just have to click it to <uncheck> it, et voila, the pieces and the squares are gone, but you can still play on by typing the coordinates! Any question sofar? |
|
| Sep-28-08 | | achieve: <Jess> Just found (doh) that you can just right-click within the space of the board, after which a menu appears with the command 'close', all the way at the bottom, and then click it... Right-click again, and on TOP in the menu there appears 'board', and after clicking that, the board and pieces re-appear! Regards,
A. Einstein |
|
| Sep-28-08 | | achieve: heh - I wrote eleviate, that's how elated I was, but I'm pretty sure it actually is <alleviate>... I saw how funny it looked as eleviate, and looked it up in the dictionary, and there it was... BTW I think the best thing is to remove that one post, to avoid a potential response- and chain reaction that will lead nowhere... But do as you see fit. I will just inform Daniel if it happens again. |
|
| Sep-28-08 | | Woody Wood Pusher: <JFQ> very interesting discussion you and <elephant> are having. I have never heard of the <elephant>'s technique of training 'blind' before, certainly original. Judging by your chess workload <JFQ> you are really serious about improving. I don't know if you have read this before, but one of the main differences between good chess players and poor ones is in the speed of their pattern recognition. Playing 'blind' is all well and good, but the reason chess-players can do it is not because they remember each move as a 'unit', like a computer, but because they have an incredible 'database' of patterns stored in their memories through experience. making connections between well know patterns (or spotting them outright) on the board reduces the amount of new information the players brain is having to deal with and so makes both blindfold play and incredibly deep play over the board possible. My advice would be to work on pattern-recognition as a whole separate area, because it really is worth it! I had an old book on it somewhere, but I can't seem to find it right now. However, I also have a newer book by <Polgar 'Chess 5334 Problems, Combinations and Games'> It is literally full of short-mates and while they are often easy to solve individually, the idea behind it is not to test your calculating ability, but to cement patterns in your memory so you no-longer have to re-calculate them OTB, but just recognise them. I can't praise this technique enough, it really works and this book saves you having to collect all these puzzles elsewhere, they are all there for practice in one volume. I watched a program in which they sent Judit Polgar to have an MRI scan and while they monitored her brain, she solved chess puzzles. The results showed that the areas of her brain most active were the same areas which store memories of peoples' faces, the pattern recognition areas. So the brain stores these patterns in the same way as remembering faces if you practice enough! Amazing stuff! |
|
| Sep-28-08 | | achieve: <Woody> Amazing indeed. Thanks for the quality advise... And <Jess> may well be interested in this Blog - http://majnublog.wordpress.com/ - maintained by <Majnu>, the man from the excellent YT vids... It is in Dutch, but you can put it through the Google page translation, and it may be readable, and have some interesting info. |
|
| Sep-28-08 | | mckmac: < Jess > Alrighty! Lets hook the engine up,make the Engineer a cup of java,and get this show on the road.Hope you don't mind if I post the rules here for everyone's reference.My Forum will of course be closed whilst the game is being played. |
|
| Sep-28-08 | | mckmac: < Folding Sentences Players > ***'FOLDING SENTENCES'***
This is how we played it.Let's say you start.On thick paper,you write a sentence, then you pass it to the next man.He responds with one of his own, and folds yours down so it can't be read by the next person.The process is repeated as the page is passed 'round the circle.Each player is only able to see the one sentence written before him.When everyone has had a turn, someone unrolls, and the whole page is read out.Hopefully, there's a little bit of sense, a couple of laughs, and a good time is had by all. I think this 'game' can be developed into an exercise of interest, nuance, and potential.And this place provides all the furniture that is needed to do that.We will need about a dozen players to start with. We set a date and then begin.Take the CG quote for that day as the first sentence.Everyone has a number drawn by lot (ie 1-12).Players are told each other's numbers.P1 responds to the quote in his own forum.He heads up his post so that the sentence is not visible on the Chessforum Activity Page. Now someone has to 'host' this -- it's my idea, so I'll do that, but I want to play next time. I think the game might work this way, but am very keen to hear any improving suggestions. I'll paste P1's post on to my page and then on to P2's page (suitably headed).When P2 posts his sentence I paste it after P1's ( players may well choose to delete, once their sentence has been acknowledged ).By the time P3 gets his sentence, there is already one 'hidden' and we're off.Players will be asked to post their sentences reasonably promptly, so as to 'keep the ball rolling'. Once the cycle is completed, we start again.On the second cycle each player gets to see two sentences behind him.On the third, three, and so on.If we do twelve cycles, that will give us 145 sentences.On the last cycle each player will see the eleven previous sentences. I'll just open and close my page for the pasting.This will give security to the players and discourage casual onlookers.As soon as the 'story' is finished, we can then 'open' it up for players to kibitz, fix the spelling mistakes, perhaps vote on a title, etc. |
|
Sep-28-08
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <Matt> who starts off with the first sentence? P1 posts the first sentence in your forum? |
|
Sep-28-08
 | | jessicafischerqueen: BTW by <P2> Matt means <player two>. He is not referring to the popular new slasher film <P2> which is set in a Parking Garage. Just trying to keep things clear here. |
|
| Sep-28-08 | | Woody Wood Pusher: I was just getting destroyed by someone on yahoo chess...he was rated 1976 and I swear he was cheating! Anyway, he dropped a whole rook from nowhere, and I mated him 6 moves after that! Then, I found $5 |
|
 |
 |
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 433 OF 801 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
|
|
|