ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 562 OF 801 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Apr-10-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: they should also fly an <I Hate Whitey> flag HAHhHhhHAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAH
GHOD |
|
| Apr-10-09 | | blacksburg: and also, in what other country on earth does any government engage in civil war against a rebel faction that tries to secede, and then after defeating the rebel faction, decide to fly the rebels' flag on government buildings? how does that make any sense? this country is crazy. |
|
Apr-10-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <Howard>
Thanks! OK I'm most interested in the part of analysis that deals specifically with the effects- if any- of the <fawn pawn>. To tell you the truth I'd like to do that on my own first. Luckily, all such things can be edited.
<Blacksburger> What about President's Day? Lots of them had slaves too.
(it's rumored that <Dick Cheney> has a few slaves, but he was only VP so maybe it's not so bad) |
|
| Apr-10-09 | | blacksburg: i just noticed the whole <FAWN PAWN> thing...heehee...are you talking about <kingscrusher>'s videos? i never knew what the heck he was saying, i had to ask him in a comment on his youtube page, apparently he's saying <THORN PAWN>, but i always liked <FAWN PAWN> better, to be honest. :) |
|
| Apr-10-09 | | hms123: The problem is that the people who are offended by a given symbol always seem to take the moral high ground. As one who is occasionally offended by certain symbols, I am not sure how much of that being offended is an emotional reaction based on life events and how much of it is simply taking the moral high ground as a political ploy rather than as a deep felt moral position. I suspect that it is more of the latter than the former. Now perhaps I am morally bankrupt and thus not capable (nor worthy) of taking a morally-principled position. Perhaps most others are more capable (and worthy) of taking such positions. No doubt a few (Gandhi, Mandela) are. Back to the issue. In the US at least, we value the protection of the minority from the "tyranny of the majority". Fine. I am all for it. However, it seems to me that there should be some limits on the "tyranny of the minority". If one person is offended is that enough? This way lies madness. Yours,
Mr. Slippery Slope |
|
| Apr-10-09 | | Boomie: <Jessiediah, defender of truthiness> My attempt to define PC in terms of correctness was perhaps another of my cute tricks. These discussions fare better when not tethered to terms like PC as you pointed out in your learned treatise. History is always suspect given the depravity of the historians. The Old Testament slam on the Egyptians comes to mind. I guess those writers were spooked by a culture so superior that it must have appeared as magic. So they had to tear it down with lies to make any sense of their destiny. And since the Egyptians had been so kind to give them land and meaningful work, the lies had to be real whoppers. Slavery indeed. They didn't have slaves in Egypt. Historians who count the dead left behind by the conqueror are useful. Now we know how long it takes to kill 70,000 men in hand to hand combat. About 6 hours according to Hannibal at Cannae. But few historians record the feelings of the great unwashed. When the Nazis try to march in Skokie, these unnamed citizens rise up to shout their objections. That's politics in action. We can't wait for the courts or legislators to work their magic. For then the moment will be lost and drained of all significance. We must oppose Nazism in every form as it is a plague upon the body of freedom. Of course few issues rise to that level. The European conquest of the Americas is appalling but much good came out of it, too. The Natives benefitted in many ways from the new technology. And the newcomers learned much from the wise ways of the tribes. Franklin and Jefferson had close contact with the Iroquois Confederacy and may have been influenced by their form of democracy. This supports Gandhiji's gray theory. |
|
| Apr-10-09 | | blacksburg: <<Blacksburger> What about President's Day? Lots of them had slaves too.>
another bad analogy, and certainly we should not celebrate some individuals based solely on their being presidents. it's totally fair to criticize and condemn washington and jefferson for being slave owners. my point is that having a national holiday named after an individual is basically a form of worship. and though Columbus may have had some major and significant achievements in his life, we should not worship him as some kind of saint. to be fair, that's a very high standard, and certainly some <Veterans> have done reprehensible things, and <MLK Jr.> was no saint either...for example... <One incident that caught the FBI's attention was the recording of a sexual encounter that took place at a 1964 party King was attending at the Willard Hotel in Washington D.C.[147] FBI technicians testified that they heard the sound of people engaged in a sexual encounter and King's voice exclaiming <<<"I'm f*****g for God!">>>> hehehehehehhehehhehehhe
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mlk_jr... i guess my point is that i suck at analogies. |
|
| Apr-10-09 | | Boomie: I look down on <bad pubic policy> because, after all, that's where it is. |
|
| Apr-10-09 | | blacksburg: <However, it seems to me that there should be some limits on the "tyranny of the minority". If one person is offended is that enough? This way lies madness.> this is a fair argument. i'll return to the example of south carolina. if the "tyranny of the minority" were to result in <private citizens> flying the confederate flag over their <private residence> being arrested and forced to take down their flags, this would be <madness>. but the issue here was a <public> <taxpayer supported> seat of a <representative> state government. <The European conquest of the Americas is appalling but much good came out of it, too.> to be clear, my main point is that there is a big difference between <European Discovery of the Americas> Day and <Columbus was a Super Cool Dude> Day. <This supports Gandhiji's gray theory.>
<"There has never been a human action- no matter how trivial or grand- that has had either all good, or all bad consequences."> this is perhaps the most true statement ever uttered. but it is unlikely to ever be understood by the masses, as their opinion tends to be influenced mainly by the ones that shout the loudest and make the best promises - the idealogues and fundamentalists. and ghandi's insight is useless to any idealogue or fundamentalist. |
|
| Apr-10-09 | | hoodrobin: <blacksburg: and regarding <political correctness>> Hi blacksburg! IMHO if <that> were easy nobody would play chess anymore.
I always try to be <pol corr> but I never know if I really am... That's why I prefer sometimes to play a correct game (perhaps also because white <is> white and black <is> black). Sorry, my twocent. |
|
Apr-10-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: I think that <Osaka Rikki Tikki Tavi> guy at <Brown> is a fundamentalist PC idealogue. However, that opinion is not as important as this fact: The faculty members who regarded <Osaka's> crusade to be idiotic but held their tongues for fear of being branded "anti-Indian" and "pro-colonialists." The gutlessness of University Faculty is appalling- especially given that many of them have tenure-- and it's also a favorite topic among many, many Undergraduates. All "heros" are spotted.
So either let them be or get rid of all of them.
"Fall Weekend"???
excuse me?
They couldn't come up with a <more vapid> name than that? Why not just call it "Day"?
That would be more honest.
Actually, cancelling the holiday would be most honest, as <Howard> pointed out earlier. Let's face it-- Brown Undergrads would allow it to be <Hitler Day> if it came down to having the day off or not having the day off. And I was thinking of your example today, <Blacksburger>, believe it or not. I was thinking OK say the Germans had made <Hitler Day>, and then after the war realized that was no longer a good idea. Would they KEEP THE FREAKING HOLIDAY and re-name it "Fresh Breeze Day," or would they have the GUTS TO CANCEL the dam holiday??? That was one of <Howard's> objections earlier. Also, I'd just like to throw in my personal opinion that I'm not a fan of <Columbus>. Although that opinion may well be based solely on being disappointed by how crappy <Gerard Depardieu> looked since he gained about 200 pounds between <Manon Des Sources> and <Columbus>. |
|
| Apr-10-09 | | hms123: <blacksburg>
<but the issue here was a <public> <taxpayer supported> seat of a <representative> state government.> Does that mean that I no longer have to pay that portion of my tax bill that supports wars that I find unjust, or public policies that I disagree with on moral grounds? There is a difference between the ability/obligation to take political action on moral issues (including not paying taxes and civil disobedience) <without being willing to accept the consequences> and taking such action <AND> being willing to take the consequences. People like Mandela spent a lot of time in jail, but eventually won the moral battle because of the example that he set. I think I have hit on my basic objection: The <PC> crowd always thinks that it should win but never thinks that there are consequences. And I'm a liberal--what must the conservatives think? |
|
| Apr-10-09 | | Eyal: Btw, there's a great episode of the <Sopranos> in which the plot revolves around the Columbus Day Parade and the Native Indian protest (http://www.hbo.com/sopranos/episode...) <A.J.: It says, in this book, that Christopher Columbus was a slave trader.Tony: So, you finally read a book and it's @#$%*&!#!> |
|
| Apr-10-09 | | blacksburg: i can't disagree that the faculty seems to be rather <gutless>. if you want to make a statement, make a statement. don't change the name and then slink away like a rat. i think it's significant that Brown is a <private> university, so basically, they can do whatever the heck they want. their decisions should not be conflated with <pubic> policy. |
|
| Apr-10-09 | | hms123: <jess> A Columbus Day FEN click for larger viewI am to PC to post any other symbols. |
|
Apr-10-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <What must the conservatives think>? Well, like this:
On the issue of America becoming a dual language country- <If speaking American was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for my kids>. If the conservatives hadn't been so objectionable, then the PC pseudo-liberal fascists wouldn't have arisen in the first place. <Howard> yes you are a liberal- and thus must be opposed to the <PC Brigade>, because, as I pointed out at length, they tout the most illiberal set of "ideas" imaginable. <John Stuart Mill> would regard them, accurately, as a menace to truth, knowledge, and the pursuit of learning. He regarded this to be a dialectical process. You know, where you actually have to erect coherent arguments to critique other people's arguments. Not just brand them as <politically incorrect> Viz his treatise on Free Speech. |
|
| Apr-10-09 | | blacksburg: <Does that mean that I no longer have to pay that portion of my tax bill that supports wars that I find unjust, or public policies that I disagree with on moral grounds?> well, <have to> maybe isn't the best choice of words there...you are still <legally obligated> to pay your taxes, but you are always free to choose not to, if you are willing to suffer the consequences. if you don't feel like pulling a Thoreau, then your only recourse is to vote for someone who will choose a different policy. <The <PC> crowd always thinks that it should win but never thinks that there are consequences.> i would rephrase this - the <PC> crowd will only accept the consequences of disobedience if the consequences of the status quo are even more disagreeable. kids during Vietnam had no hesitance about burning their draft cards and accepting the consequences of that action, because they knew that the alternative - being shot to death in some jungle - was even worse than going to jail. but kids today that object to the Iraq war don't seem to be willing to accept the consequences of disobedience, i.e. choosing not to pay taxes, do they? it's not a coincidence that Iraq is being fought by a volunteer force. if the US started drafting kids to go to Iraq, i suspect that the anti-war movement would become a bit more...vocal, to say the least. the question is - how much do you ACTUALLY care? and the answer tends to be - i care as much as the policy affects me personally. |
|
| Apr-10-09 | | PinnedPiece: How many of these links does your page have? You must be aware of... http://www.bobby-fischer.net/bobby_... Kind of an odd collection, not as good as yours! |
|
Apr-10-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Hi <PP> thanks for the heads up. Yes I know the site- It's got a few security issues. I have my new PC loaded with security software and My computer practially had a fit when I just clicked on the site. heh...
Also, the site is not updated regularly.
IMO it's a good place to read the "classic" articles about Bobby's Chess career up to 1972. |
|
| Apr-10-09 | | blacksburg: i don't even remember what i was arguing about anymore...oh yeah, Brown, how the heck did i get to burning draft cards? on second thought, disregard all of my above posts. i haven't slept in a long time, and there's no way i'm making any sense. |
|
| Apr-10-09 | | madlydeeply: oh if only I had time to read this awesome catfight!! usa IS a dual language country spanish and english when the black slaves were freed mexican slavery was expanded and our "economy" has been resting on the back of migrant/illegal labor ever since. EVERY vegetable picked is by mexican hands for pennies. Except for black/mexican prison labor for fractions of pennies. Burn them draft cards.
I WILL RETURN!! |
|
Apr-10-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <there's no way i'm making any sense.> That's crazy talk! You always make sense.
Plus, you solved the <Fawn Pawn> mystery. |
|
Apr-10-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <Carmen>
Home stretch- 7 pages to go
GHOD I can't wait for it to be over.
Mrs. Manuel Labor |
|
Apr-10-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3NJ...
Freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Nelson Mandela
whoopa |
|
| Apr-10-09 | | hms123: <jess> It doesn't get any sillier than this: <PETA has asked the Pet Shop Boys to change the band's name to Rescue Shelter Boys.The band has turned down a request from an animal rights group to rename itself the Rescue Shelter Boys.> http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/Mus... |
|
 |
 |
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 562 OF 801 ·
Later Kibitzing> |