ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 566 OF 801 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Apr-13-09 | | Travis Bickle: Jess I didnt get your 2nd letter? |
|
Apr-13-09
 | | SwitchingQuylthulg: One more famous <Fawn Pawn> game: Chigorin vs Steinitz, 1889 |
|
Apr-13-09
 | | chancho: If anyone deserves all the credit for stopping the 61 hemmorrhage in the Fischer page it's definitely you <Jess>. Fortunately Eddie the Fibber is banned from that page, but he may yet appear as <hackmate>, and then there's <Joshka> aka Tattoo as Labate calls him. (De book! De book!) |
|
Apr-13-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <chancho>
Maybe- but I'm beginning to get a glimmer of hope.
You noticed that <CG.com> is "officially happy" with the current forum split? And they used the term "flare up" to describe <My 61 etc.> posts on the <Fischer page>? THE PLAN-
Step one-
When <hackmate> or <joshka> or anyone resumes posting propaganda about the book, I will re-post their posts in Mrs. Alekhine house. Then I will re-post the <CG.com> post on the Fischer page, explaining to them what I have done. BACK UP PLAN-
If they persist, I will email <Daniel Freeman> directly and request that the <Fischer page> be monitored for <61 game posts> and request that they be deleted, after I re-post them, on the grounds of being "off topic." Let's keep our fingers crossed, OK?
And again- this could not have happened without your leadership. Since you were the most dedicated "detective" in the task of disproving the book's authenticity. I think it is important for a hundred reasons to keep the discussion going in <Mrs. Alekhine> forum=- And I will be an <active host>. I know that the most important technique to keep a thread going is for one person to function as "active host." |
|
| Apr-13-09 | | hms123: <jess> congratulatory emu at your house. |
|
Apr-13-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Hi <Howard>!
Yes thanks!
I read your kind message.
I'm praying that the congratulations are not premature. I've been busy at work all morning.
Unfortunately, I have ZERO DUTIES today, same as yesterday. Plus my school offered me a $4,400 dollar raise to come back and "teach" another year here. I think that's probably an offer I can't refuse.
I like my job here because I like the kids. Plus, these days, a "job in the hand.." Anyhoo I've spent all morning with SPRING CLEANING in my forum. I've given it a Cleaner, Leaner, more Pro-Bobby look. I hope.
Mrs. Tidying up |
|
| Apr-13-09 | | madlydeeply: Convoy
By Bill Fries & Chip Davis
---
Uh, Breaker One-Nine, this here's the Rubber Duck
You got a copy on me Pig-Pen? C'mon
Uh, yeah 10-4 Pig Pen, fer sure, fer sure
By golly it's clean clear to Flag-Town, C'mon
Uh, yeah, that's a big 10-4 Pig-Pen,
Yeah, we definitely got us the front door good buddy,
Mercy sakes alive, looks like we got us a convoy
Was the dark of the moon, on the sixth of June
In a Kenworth, pullin' logs
Cabover Pete with a reefer on
And a Jimmy haulin' hogs
We 'as headin' fer bear on I-One-Oh
'Bout a mile outta Shaky-Town
I sez Pig-Pen, this here's the Rubber Duck
An' I'm about to put the hammer on down
Cause we gotta little ol' convoy, rockin' through the night
Yeah we gotta little ol' convoy, ain't she a beautiful sight?
Come on an' join our convoy, ain't nothin' gonna git in our way
We're gonna roll this truckin' convoy, cross the USA
Convoy... Convoy...
Uh, breaker Pig-Pen, this here's The Duck
Uh, you wanna back off them hogs
10-4, 'bout five mile or so, 10-roger
Them hogs is gittin' in-tense up here
By the time we got into Tulsa-Town
We had eighty-five trucks in all
But they's a road block up on the clover leaf
An' them bears 'as wall to wall
Yeah them smokies 'as thick as bugs on a bumper
They even had a bear-in-the-air
I sez callin' all trucks, this here's The Duck
We about to go a huntin' bear
Cause we gotta great big convoy, rockin' through the night
Yeah we gotta great big convoy, ain't she a beautiful sight?
Come on an' join our convoy, ain't nothin' gonna git in our way
We're gonna roll this truckin' convoy, cross the USA
Convoy... Convoy...
Uh, you wanna give me a 10-9 on that Pig-Pen?
Uh, negatory Pig-Pen, yer still too close
Yeah, them hogs is startin' close up my sinuses
Mercy sakes, you better back off another ten
Well we rolled up interstate fourty-four
Like a rocket sled on rails
We tore up all a our swindle sheets
An' left 'em settin' on the scales
By the time we hit that Chi-Town
Them bears was a gittin' smart
They'd brought up some reinforcements
From the Illinois National Guard
There 'as armored cars, and tanks, and Jeeps
An' rigs of every size
Yeah them chicken coops 'as full a bears
An' choppers filled the skies
Well we shot the line, an' we went for broke
With a thousand screamin' trucks
And eleven long-haired friends of Jesus
In a chartreusse microbus
Hey Sod Buster, listen
You wanna put that microbus in behind the suicide jockey?
Yeah, he's haulin dynamite
He needs all the help he can git
Well we laid a strip fer the Jersey Shore
An' prepared to cross the line
I could see the bridge 'as lined with bears
But I didn't have a doggone dime
I sez Pig-Pen, this here's the Rubber Duck
We just ain't a gonna pay no toll
So we crashed the gate doin' ninety-eight
I sez, let them truckers roll, 10-4
Cause we gotta mighty convoy, rockin' through the night
Yeah we gotta mighty convoy, ain't she a beautiful sight?
Come on an' join our convoy, ain't nothin' gonna git in our way
We're gonna roll this truckin' convoy, cross the USA
Convoy... Convoy...
Uh, 10-4 Pig-Pen, what's yer 20?
Omaha?!
Well they oughta know what to do with them hogs out there fer sure
Well mercy sakes alive good buddy
We gonna back on outta here
So keep the bugs off yer glass
An' the bears off yer... tail
We gonna catch ya on the flip-flop
This here's the Rubber Duck on the side
We gone
Bye, Bye... |
|
| Apr-13-09 | | madlydeeply: the Oil, stupid!
Noam Chomsky
Khaleej Times, July 8, 2008
The deal just taking shape between Iraq's Oil Ministry and four Western oil companies raises critical questions about the nature of the US invasion and occupation of Iraq — questions that should certainly be addressed by presidential candidates and seriously discussed in the United States, and of course in occupied Iraq, where it appears that the population has little if any role in determining the future of their country.
Negotiations are under way for Exxon Mobil, Shell, Total and BP — the original partners decades ago in the Iraq Petroleum Company, now joined by Chevron and other smaller oil companies — to renew the oil concession they lost to nationalisation during the years when the oil producers took over their own resources. The no-bid contracts, apparently written by the oil corporations with the help of U.S. officials, prevailed over offers from more than 40 other companies, including companies in China, India and Russia. "There was suspicion among many in the Arab world and among parts of the American public that the United States had gone to war in Iraq precisely to secure the oil wealth these contracts seek to extract," Andrew E. Kramer wrote in The New York Times. Kramer's reference to "suspicion" is an understatement. Furthermore, it is highly likely that the military occupation has taken the initiative in restoring the hated Iraq Petroleum Company, which, as Seamus Milne writes in the London Guardian, was imposed under British rule to "dine off Iraq's wealth in a famously exploitative deal." Later reports speak of delays in the bidding. Much is happening in secrecy, and it would be no surprise if new scandals emerge. The demand could hardly be more intense. Iraq contains perhaps the second largest oil reserves in the world, which are, furthermore, very cheap to extract: no permafrost or tar sands or deep sea drilling. For US planners, it is imperative that Iraq remain under U.S. control, to the extent possible, as an obedient client state that will also house major U.S. military bases, right at the heart of the world's major energy reserves. That these were the primary goals of the invasion was always clear enough through the haze of successive pretexts: weapons of mass destruction, Saddam's links with Al-Qaeda, democracy promotion and the war against terrorism, which, as predicted, sharply increased as a result of the invasion. Last November, the guiding concerns were made explicit when President Bush and Iraq's Prime Minister Nouri Al Maliki signed a "Declaration of Principles," ignoring the U.S. Congress and Iraqi parliament, and the populations of the two countries. The Declaration left open the possibility of an indefinite long-term U.S. military presence in Iraq that would presumably include the huge air bases now being built around the country, and the "embassy" in Baghdad, a city within a city, unlike any embassy in the world. These are not being constructed to be abandoned. The Declaration also had a remarkably brazen statement about exploiting the resources of Iraq. It said that the economy of Iraq, which means its oil resources, must be open to foreign investment, "especially American investments." That comes close to a pronouncement that we invaded you so that we can control your country and have privileged access to your resources. The seriousness of this commitment was underscored in January, when President Bush issued a "signing statement" declaring that he would reject any congressional legislation that restricted funding "to establish any military installation or base for the purpose of providing for the permanent stationing of United States Armed Forces in Iraq" or "to exercise United States control of the oil resources of Iraq." |
|
Apr-13-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Oh no.....
<Convoy>...
GHOD |
|
| Apr-13-09 | | madlydeeply: CHomsky CONTINUED
Extensive resort to "signing statements" to expand executive power is yet another Bush innovation, condemned by the American Bar Association as "contrary to the rule of law and our constitutional separation of powers." To no avail. Not surprisingly, the Declaration aroused immediate objections in Iraq, among others from Iraqi unions, which survive even under the harsh anti-labour laws that Saddam instituted and the occupation preserves. In Washington propaganda, the spoiler to US domination in Iraq is Iran. U.S. problems in Iraq are blamed on Iran. US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice sees a simple solution: "foreign forces" and "foreign arms" should be withdrawn from Iraq — Iran's, not ours. The confrontation over Iran's nuclear programme heightens the tensions. The Bush administration's "regime change" policy toward Iran comes with ominous threats of force (there Bush is joined by both US presidential candidates). The policy also is reported to include terrorism within Iran — again legitimate, for the world rulers. A majority of the American people favours diplomacy and oppose the use of force. But public opinion is largely irrelevant to policy formation, not just in this case. An irony is that Iraq is turning into a US-Iranian condominium. The Maliki government is the sector of Iraqi society most supported by Iran. The so-called Iraqi army — just another militia — is largely based on the Badr brigade, which was trained in Iran, and fought on the Iranian side during the Iran-Iraq war. Nir Rosen, one of the most astute and knowledgeable correspondents in the region, observes that the main target of the US-Maliki military operations, Moktada Al Sadr, is disliked by Iran as well: He's independent and has popular support, therefore dangerous. Iran "clearly supported Prime Minister Maliki and the Iraqi government against what they described as 'illegal armed groups' (of Moktada's Mahdi army) in the recent conflict in Basra," Rosen writes, "which is not surprising given that their main proxy in Iraq, the Supreme Iraqi Islamic Council dominates the Iraqi state and is Maliki's main backer." "There is no proxy war in Iraq," Rosen concludes, "because the U.S. and Iran share the same proxy." Teheran is presumably pleased to see the United States institute and sustain a government in Iraq that's receptive to their influence. For the Iraqi people, however, that government continues to be a disaster, very likely with worse to come. In Foreign Affairs, Steven Simon points out that current US counterinsurgency strategy is "stoking the three forces that have traditionally threatened the stability of Middle Eastern states: tribalism, warlordism and sectarianism." The outcome might be "a strong, centralised state ruled by a military junta that would resemble" Saddam's regime. If Washington achieves its goals, then its actions are justified. Reactions are quite different when Vladimir Putin succeeds in pacifying Chechnya, to an extent well beyond what Gen. David Petraeus has achieved in Iraq. But that is THEM, and this is US. Criteria are therefore entirely different. In the US, the Democrats are silenced now because of the supposed success of the US military surge in Iraq. Their silence reflects the fact that there are no principled criticisms of the war. In this way of regarding the world, if you're achieving your goals, the war and occupation are justified. The sweetheart oil deals come with the territory. In fact, the whole invasion is a war crime — indeed the supreme international crime, differing from other war crimes in that it encompasses all the evil that follows, in the terms of the Nuremberg judgment. This is among the topics that can't be discussed, in the presidential campaign or elsewhere. Why are we in Iraq? What do we owe Iraqis for destroying their country? The majority of the American people favour US withdrawal from Iraq. Do their voices matter? |
|
Apr-13-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tk4... GHOD |
|
| Apr-13-09 | | madlydeeply: Modern History Sourcebook:
Winston Churchill:
"Blood, Toil, Tears and Sweat", May 13, 1940
---
The leadership of Neville Chamberlain proved insufficient during the war, and in May 1940, Winston S. Churchill was appointed Prime Minister of an all-party government. Churchill proved to be an inspiring leader in the fight with Germany. On May 13, 1940he gave his first speech to the House of Commons, a speech which displays the oratorical skills which were so effective in keeping up public morale. On Friday evening last I received from His Majesty the mission to form a new administration. It was the evident will of' Parliament and the nation that this should be conceived on the broadest possible basis and that it should include all parties. I have already completed the most important part of this task. A war cabinet has been formed of five members, representing, with the Labour, Opposition, and Liberals, the unity of the nation. It was necessary that this should be done in one single day on account of the extreme urgency and rigor of events. Other key positions were filled yesterday. I am submitting a further list to the king tonight. I hope to complete the appointment of principal ministers during tomorrow. The appointment of other ministers usually takes a little longer. I trust when Parliament meets again this part of my task will be completed and that the administration will be complete in all respects. I considered it in the public interest to suggest to the Speaker that the House should be summoned today. At the end of today's proceedings, the adjournment of the House will be proposed until May 21 with provision for earlier meeting if need be. Business for that will be notified to MPs at the earliest opportunity. I now invite the House by a resolution to record its approval of the steps taken and declare its confidence in the new government. The resolution:
"That this House welcomes the formation of a government representing the united and inflexible resolve of the nation to prosecute the war with Germany to a victorious conclusion."
To form an administration of this scale and complexity is a serious undertaking in itself. But we are in the preliminary phase of one of the greatest battles in history. We are in action at many other points-in Norway and in Holland-and we have to be prepared in the Mediterranean. The air battle is continuing, and many preparations have to be made here at home. In this crisis I think I may be pardoned if I do not address the House at any length today, and I hope that any of my friends and colleagues or former colleagues who are affected by the political reconstruction will make all allowances for any lack of ceremony with which it has been necessary to act. I say to the House as I said to ministers who have joined this government, I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears, and sweat. We have before us an ordeal of the most grievous kind. We have before us many, many months of struggle and suffering. You ask, what is our policy? I say it is to wage war by land, sea, and air. War with all our might and with all the strength God has given us, and to wage war against a monstrous tyranny never surpassed in the dark and lamentable catalogue of human crime. That is our policy. You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word. It is victory. Victory at all costs - Victory in spite of all terrors - Victory, however long and hard the road may be, for without victory there is no survival. Let that be realized. No survival for the British Empire, no survival for all that the British Empire has stood for, no survival for the urge, the impulse of the ages, that mankind shall move forward toward his goal. I take up my task in buoyancy and hope. I feel sure that our cause will not be suffered to fail among men. I feel entitled at this juncture, at this time, to claim the aid of all and to say, "Come then, let us go forward together with our united strength." |
|
| Apr-13-09 | | achieve: Three more pages to go?
That'd be a "pittance!!"
Brilliant word, ainnit?
Middle of the night here and it just "came" to me... Pittance, that is. Funny how the human brain works.
<Jess> Glad you found the tips useful the other day at my place. Basically it is just a reliable vessel, which needs to be filled with relatively constant, permanent types of "cargo" - and some cargo that gets renewed/replaced from time to time. Hey, much too long a post, this!
Three pages is 75 posts, you're prolly down to 70 by the time I post this... ????
heh |
|
| Apr-13-09 | | madlydeeply: this is my new hero I can't get enough of him
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MM40... |
|
| Apr-13-09 | | achieve: Make that sixty...uhh...one thanks to <madly> then... HAH |
|
| Apr-13-09 | | madlydeeply: really the length of the posts doesn't matter?
Boy do I feel stupid |
|
| Apr-13-09 | | achieve: <m> Yep - length - does not matter in case of posts and filling a page, that's why some pages are such a long "scroll" |
|
| Apr-13-09 | | madlydeeply: oh my |
|
| Apr-13-09 | | madlydeeply: cognito |
|
| Apr-13-09 | | madlydeeply: ergo sum |
|
| Apr-13-09 | | madlydeeply: now for some Heraclitus quotes |
|
Apr-13-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: SPAM WAR
alert!
STAY CLEAR FOR GHOD'S SAKE
SPAM WAR! |
|
| Apr-13-09 | | madlydeeply: Abundance of knowledge does not teach men to be wise. |
|
| Apr-13-09 | | achieve: I remember the day I first opened my forum, and <Jess> and <Chessmoron> and <mojo> and me had a great time; 3 pages and change was the result.
And friendship, which was the thing, really. |
|
| Apr-13-09 | | madlydeeply: If it were not for injustice, men would not know justice. |
|
 |
 |
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 566 OF 801 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
|
|
|